<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:N.nicomachus_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:N.nicomachus_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="N"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="nicomachus-bio-4" n="nicomachus_4"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Nico'machus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Νικόμαχος</surname></persName>), a son of Aristotle
      by the slave Herpyllis. We are destitute of any particulars of his life. The following points
      are merely indicated by their several authorities. From the will of Aristotle, as given by
      Laertiu;, we infer that Nicomachus was a mere boy when the will was made, and that he was
      entrusted first to the care of tutors therein named, and then to the discretion of Nicanor,
      Aristotle's adopted son. We are told by the same authority that Theophrastus was his teacher.
      Eusebius (<hi rend="ital">Praep.</hi> 15.2) states that, while still young, he died in war.
       (<bibl n="D. L. 5.1">D. L. 5.1</bibl>, <bibl n="D. L. 5.12">12</bibl>, <bibl n="D. L. 5.35">35</bibl>; Euseb. <hi rend="ital">1. c.;</hi> Suid. <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Νικόμαχζς</foreign>.) He must have lived about <date when-custom="-320">B. C. 320</date>.</p><p>His name, as an author, has become mixed tip with that of his illustrious father. Cicero
       (<hi rend="ital">de Fin.</hi> 5.5) and Laertius (8.88) seem to attribute to him certain
      ethical writings that are generally ascribed to Aristotle. Some modern writers have assented
      to this, but on slender grounds. (Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iii. p. 262.)
      It is not difficult to see how the mistake may have arisen. A portion of the moral writings of
      Aristotle bears the name of <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἠθικὰ Νικομαχεία</foreign>, why we
      cannot tell; whether the father so named them, as a memorial of his affection to his young
      son, or whether they derived their title from being afterwards edited and commented on by
      Nicomachus. [See Vol. I. of this work, p. 331a. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἠθικὰ
       Ἐυδήμεια</foreign>.] This last reason is rendered not improbable from the circumstance
      mentioned by Suidas (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), that Nicomachus wrote six books (probably a
      comment) on ethics, and a comment on his father's work <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶτῆζ
       θυσικῆς Ἀκροάσεως</foreign>. Hence the confusion between the editor and commentator, and
      the original author. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.M.G">W.M.G</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>