<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mucianus_licinius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mucianus_licinius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="mucianus-licinius-bio-1" n="mucianus_licinius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Mucia'nus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Lici'nius</surname></persName></label></head><p>three times consul in <date when-custom="52">A. D. 52</date>, 70, and 75 respectively, must have
      passed by adoption from the Mucian to the Licinian gens. His character is drawn in a few
      strokes by the masterly hand of Tacitus. (<hi rend="ital">Hist.</hi> 1.10.) He was alike
      distinguished for good and for evil, for luxurious indulgence and energetic work, for
      affability and haughtiness; when he had nothing to attend to, he revelled in excessive
      pleasures; but when business required his attention, he displayed great abilities. Thus his
      public conduct deserved praise, his private condemnation. As a youth, he courted with
      assiduity the favour of the powerful, and succeeded in obtaining the consulship in the reign
      of Claudius, <date when-custom="52">A. D. 52</date>; but having squandered his property, and
      becoming likewise an object of suspicion to Claudius, he went into retirement in Asia, and
      there lived, says Tacitus, as near to the condition of an exile as afterwards to that of an
      emperor. We gather from Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 12.1.5">Plin. Nat. 12.1. s. 5</bibl>) that
      the place of his retirement was Lycia, into which he was sent as legatus by Claudius, as a
      kind of honourable banishment. Under Nero he was again received into the favour of the
      imperial court; and at the death of that emperor, <date when-custom="68">A. D. 68</date>, he had the
      command of the province of Syria, with four legions, while Vespasian was in the neighbouring
      country of Judaea, at the head of three. Up to Nero's death Mucianus and Vespasian had not
      been on good terms; but after that event they were induced, by the interposition of friends,
      to become reconciled to one another, and to act together for their mutual advantage; and their
      reconciliation was rendered real and lasting by the mediation of Titus, to whom Mucianus
      became much attached. Mucianus and Vespasian both took the oath of allegiance to Otho; but
      when the civil war broke out between him and Vitellius, Vespasian resolved to seize the
      imperial throne. In this resolution he was warmly encouraged by Mucianus, who hoped to have a
      great share in the exercise of the imperial power while Vespasian bore the name. When
      Vespasian at length, after great hesitation, assumed the imperial title, Mucianus immediately
      administered to his own soldiers the oath of allegiance to the new emperor; and it was
      resolved that he should march into Europe against Vitellius, while Vespasian and Titus
      remained behind in Asia. Mucianus used great efforts to provide his army with everything that
      was necessary; he liberally contributed from his own purse, and unmercifully plundered the
      provincials to obtain a sufficient supply of money. However, there was little occasion for his
      services, for the Vitellians were entirely defeated by Antonius Primus [<hi rend="smallcaps">PRIMUS</hi>], of whom, in consequence, Mucianus became very jealous. Mucianus marched
      through Phrygia and Cappadocia, and arrived in Europe just in time to repress a rising of the
      Dacians, who had seized both banks of the Danube. Primus had entered Rome before Mucianus; but
      on the arrival of the latter he had to surrender all the power into his hands. Domitian, the
      son of Vespasian, was nominally at the head of affairs; but Mucianus was the real sovereign,
      and lived in almost regal splendour. Still, although he boasted haughtily of the services he
      had rendered to Vespasian, his fidelity never seems to have wavered; and all his various
      measures were calculated to support and strengthen the new dynasty. When Vespasian was on his
      way to Italy, Mucianus went to Brundisium to meet him, accompanied by the principal Roman
      nobles. The services of Mucianus had been so great, that Vespasian continued to show him his
      favour, although his patience was not a little tried by the arrogance of his subject. The last
      circumstance recorded of Mucianus is that he persuaded Vespasian to banish the philosophers
      from Rome. He seems to have died in the reign of Vespasian, as his name does not occur either
      under Titus or Domitian.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Mucianus was not only a general and a statesman, but an orator and an historian. His powers
       of oratory are greatly praised by Tacitus, who tells us that Mucianus could address an
       auditory even in Greek with great effect.</p><div><head>Collection of speeches from the republican period</head><p>He made a collection of the speeches of the republican period, which he arranged and
        published in eleven books of <hi rend="ital">Acta</hi> and three of <hi rend="ital">Epistolae.</hi></p></div><div><head>History</head><p>The subject of his history is not mentioned; but, judging from the references which Pliny
        makes to it, it appears to have treated chiefly of the East, and to have contained
        considerable information on all geographical subjects.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><bibl n="Tac. Hist. 1.10">Tac. Hist. 1.10</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 1.76">76</bibl>,
        <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.4">2.4</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.5">5</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.76">76</bibl>_<bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.84">84</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 3.8">3.8</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 3.46">46</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 3.53">53</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 3.78">78</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 4.4">4.4</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 4.11">11</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 4.39">39</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 4.80">80</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 4.85">85</bibl>; Suet. <hi rend="ital">Vesp.</hi> 6, 13; <bibl n="D. C. 65.8">D. C. 65.8</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 65.9">9</bibl>,
        <bibl n="D. C. 65.22">22</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 66.2">66.2</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 66.9">9</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 66.13">13</bibl>; Joseph. <hi rend="ital">B. J.</hi> 4.10, 11;
        <bibl n="Plin. Nat. 12.1.5">Plin. Nat. 12.1. s. 5</bibl>, 28.2. s. 5, 34.7. s. 17, et
       passim; Vossius, <hi rend="ital">De Hist. Lat.</hi> 1.27, p. 140, Lug. Bat. 1651; Westermann,
        <hi rend="ital">Gesch. d. Römischen Beredtsamkeit,</hi> § 82, n. 19.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>