<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.michael_vii_ducas_parapinaces_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.michael_vii_ducas_parapinaces_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="michael-vii-ducas-parapinaces-bio-1" n="michael_vii_ducas_parapinaces_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Michael</surname><genName full="yes">Vii.</genName></persName> or <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Michael</surname><addName full="yes">Ducas</addName><addName full="yes">Parapina'ces</addName></persName></label></head><p><label xml:lang="grc">Μιχαὴν ὁ Δοῦκας</label>, (<label xml:lang="grc">ὁ
       Παραπινάκης</label>), emperor of Constantinople from <date when-custom="1071">A. D. 1071</date>
      to 1071, was the <pb n="1078"/> son of the emperor Constantine XI., Ducas, who created died in
      1059, shortly after appointing his three sons, Michael, Andronicus, and Constantine, to
      succeed him in joint possession of the crown. On account of their tender age, their mother,
      Eudoxia, reigned for them; and having married Romanus Diogenes, this distinguished general
      enjoyed the imperial title and power till he was made a prisoner by Alp Arslan, the sultan of
      the Seljuks, in August, 1071. When hiscaptivitybecame known at Constantinople, Joannes Caesar
      caused his nephew, Michael, to be proclaimed emperor, with a view of reigning under his name.
      Soon afterwards Romanus returned from his captivity, but he came too late to retrieve his
      fate: he was seized and blinded, and died from the operation in October, 1071. Eudoxia was
      confined in a prison; and these atrocities were committed without Michael taking the least
      step to prevent them.</p><p>John, archbishop of Sida, in Pamphylia, John the Caesar, Nicephorizus, and other ministers,
      now governed the empire for Michael. Enraged that the ransom for which he had restored the
      late Romanus to liberty was not paid by Michael, sultan Alp Arslan invaded the empire in 1072.
      Isaac and Alexis Comnenus commanded the Greek army against him. Owing to the want of
      discipline of his troops, Isaac lost a battle and his liberty, but was soon ransomed by
      Alexis. The two brothers prepared for taking revenge, when affairs received a different turn,
      through the daring ambition of one Ursel, a kinsman of the kings of Scotland, and the
      commander of a body of European auxiliaries in the Greek service. Having made himself master
      of most of the strongholds and mountain passes in the anti-Taurus and portions of Armenia and
      Lazica, he ceased at once to fight against the Turks and to help the Greeks, intending to make
      himself independent in those parts. For this purpose he intrigued with John the Caesar, who
      joined him, and was proclaimed emperor of the Greeks by the Frankish auxiliaries. Both the
      Greeks and Turks looked at these proceedings with wonder, when the latter, impatient to come
      to blows, fell upon John and Ursel, defeated them, and made them both prisoners. Ursel soon
      redeemed himself, and retired into Pontus, whither he was followed by Nicephorus Palaeologus,
      who gained a decisive battle over him. On his flight, Ursel was again taken by the Turks.
      Alexis Comnenus, wishing to obtain possession of this dangerous adventurer, offered a large
      bribe to the Turks for his person; and having attained his ends, sent him to Constantinople
      (1073), where he was kept in prison.</p><p>In 1074 the Bulgarians, exasperated by the insatiable avarice of the minister Nicephorizus,
      attempted to throw off the Greek yoke, and offered the crown to Bodinus, the grandson of
      Michael, king of Servia, who accepted it, and came to their assistance with a body of his
      countrymen. Bulgaria was then governed by Nicephorus Carentenus, a very competent man, who had
      taken proper measures for quelling the revolt, when he was prevented from carrying them out by
      the arrival of Damianus Dalassenus, who was sent to supersede him as governor. Dalassenus owed
      his promotion to some court intrigue. and six weeks after his appointment had the satisfaction
      of seeing himself a prisoner of the Bulgarians. and his army flying through the country.
      Bryennius, who had been Caesar after the captivity of John, retrieved the fortune of the
      Greeks. Bodinus lost several battles, and fell into the hands of Bryennius, who, on the order
      of Michael, sent him as a state prisoner to some fortress in Syria, whence, however, the young
      prince escaped and returned to Servia, over which he became king after the death of his
      father. Bryennius likewise compelled the Servians to sue for peace; purged the Adriatic and
      the Ionian sea of the Norman pirates; and quelled a dangerous mutiny of some of his barbarian
      auxiliaries, who were headed by Nestor, the commander-in-chief of the army of observation on
      the Danube. His success deserved reward, but earning disgrace instead, he listened to the
      persuasive wishes of his numerous friends, raised the standard of rebellion, and was
      proclaimed emperor under the walls of Adrianople. He despatched his brother John to lay siege
      to Constantinople, while he continued to consolidate his authority in Thrace and Macedonia.
      The capital was gallantly defended by Constantine Ducas, Alexis Comnenus, and Ursel, who was
      restored to liberty on condition of employing his great military talents for the defence of
      the emperor. Meanwhile, another rebellion broke out in the East. Only ten days after Bryennius
      had assumed the imperial title his example was followed by Nicephorus Botaniates in Asia
      Minor, who advanced with an army mostly composed of Turks, and soon penetrated as far as
      Nicaea. At that time Constantinople had ceased to be besieged by John Bryennius, whose men
      were too licentious to hold out long against well-disciplined troops, commanded by the best
      generals of Greece, and he consequently withdrew to the head-quarters of his brother. The
      conduct of the emperor during this crisis was so contemptible that the approach of Botaniates
      created joy among the people, and caused great satisfaction to a crowd of disaffected generals
      and ambitious priests: they sent a deputatiom to him, inviting him formally to occupy the
      imperial throne; and he of course complied with their wishes. Michael, forsaken by all his
      adherents except Alexis and Isaac Comnenus, who stood with him to the last moment, abandoned
      all hopes of resisting so formidable an enemy, and without regret resigned the crown to
      Botaniates, on the 25th of March, 1078. The ensuing struggle between Botaniates and Bryennius
      belongs to the history of the former. Michael was allowed to retire into a convent, and
      Botaniates had so little fear of his harmless character that he made him Archbishop of
      Ephesus, a post for which the ex-emperor was decidedly more fit than for the throne of
      Constantinople. As weak-minded as his father, Michael had the misfortune to be put under the
      tutorship of the wellknown Michael Psellus, a learned pedant, who, instead of making the young
      prince fit to rule over man, by teaching him law and history, and enlarging his mind, which
      was already narrow enough, instructed him chiefly in grammar and rhetoric, thus creating in
      the young man an artificial taste for such studies, which never left him in after life, and
      made his mind quite unfit for the severe Ibusiness of government and legislation. While
      Michael was a boy Psellus was proud of him, because his pupil was more learned than other boys
      of his age, but when he became a man and a king, Psellus felt ashamed of him and himself, and
      to this feeling we must needs ascribe the circumstance that he did not extend his history to
      the reign <pb n="1079"/> of Michael, but left off with his accession (Zonar. vol. ii. p. 286,
      &amp;c.; Bryen. lib. ii. iii. &amp;c.; Scylitz. p. 850, &amp;c.; Glyc. p. 329, &amp;c.;
      Manass. p. 134, 135; Joel, p. 185.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.P">W.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>