<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.methodius_6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.methodius_6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="methodius-bio-6" n="methodius_6"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Metho'dius</surname></persName></head><p>6. Surnamed <hi rend="smallcaps">PATARENSIS</hi>, and sometimes, <hi rend="smallcaps">EUBULUS</hi> or <hi rend="smallcaps">EUBULIUS</hi>, lived in the third, and died in the
      beginning of the fourth century of our era. He held successively the sees of Olympus and
      Patara in Lycia (whence Patarensis) and Tyrus in Phoenicia. He was a Christian; and Suidas
      says that he died the death of a martyr, at Chalcis <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀνατολῆς</foreign> (one of the two Chalcis in <pb n="1067"/> Syria), during the reign of
      Decius (<date when-custom="249">A. D. 249</date>-<date when-custom="251">251</date>) and Valerianus. The
      addition of the latter name seems to be spurious, since Valerian did not reign with, but after
      Decius. However the original text of Suidas may be, he was wrong with regard to the time
      assigned by him to the death of Methodius; for there seems to be no doubt that this divine was
      a contemporary of Porphyry, and perhaps outlived him; and if he therefore died during one of
      the later persecutions of the Christians, as is asserted, it might have been in 303, as Cave
      thinks, or in 311, according to Fabricius. Methodius was a man of great learning and exemplary
      piety, who enjoyed the general esteem of his contemporaries.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>He wrote several works, the principal of which are:--</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Ἀναστάσεωος</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De
         Resurrectione</title></head><p>against Origen, which was divided into two or perhaps three parts.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Fragments of it are given by Epiphanius in his <title xml:lang="la">Panarium;</title> in Photius, <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca</title></bibl>; <bibl>a
          few are contained in the works of Damascenus.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῶν γενετῶν</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De
         Creatis</title></head><p>in Photius.</p></div><div><head>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Αὐτεξουσίον καὶ πόθεν τὰ κακὰ</foreign>,
         <title xml:lang="la">De Libro Arbitrio.</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Leo Allatius had the complete text with a Latin version but the work, as contained
          in the edition of Methodius by Combéfis, is not quite complete.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>4. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῆς ἀγγελομιμήτου παρθενείας καὶ
         ἁγνείας</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De Angelica Virginitate et
        Castitate,</title></head><p>written in the form of a dialogue.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Leo Allatius published this work, Gr. et Lat., in his <title xml:lang="la">Diatriba
           de Methodiis,</title> at Rome, 1656, 8vo. and dedicated it to Pope Alexander
         VII.</bibl></p><p><bibl>At the same time Petrus Possinus obtained the Greek text of this work from Lucas
          Holsten, at Rome; and having prepared a copy for the press, sent it, together with a Latin
          version, to Paris, where it was published in the following year, 1657, fol.</bibl>
         Possinus, strangely enough, dedicated his edition to the same pope, not knowing that Leo
         Allatius was doing, or had just done, the same thing; nor was Allatius at all aware of
         Possinus being engaged in the same work at the same time as he was. <bibl>It is also
          contained in Combéfis, <hi rend="ital">Auctuar. Biblioth. Patr.</hi> Paris,
          1672.</bibl> Photius, quoted below, says that the work had been adulterated, and contained
         especially several passages tending to Arianism, of which no trace is to be found in the
         later editions, so that his MS. was decidedly different from those perused by Allatius and
         Possinus.</p></div></div><div><head>5. <title xml:lang="la">Oratio de Simeone et Anna,</title> seu <title xml:lang="la">In
         Festum Occursus et Purificationis B. Mariae</title></head><p>This work is said to be the production of a later Methodius, but Allatius vindicates the
        authorship of Methodius Patarensis</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>ed. Petrus Plantinus, Antwerp, 1598.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>6. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λόγος περὶ Μαρτύρων</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Sermo de Martyribus.</title></head><p/></div><div><head>7. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὰ</foreign> Bai+/a, <title xml:lang="la">In Ramos
         Palmarum</title></head><p>An oration, of which Photius has extracts. The authorship of Methodius is doubtful.</p></div><div><head>8. <title xml:lang="la">Libri adversus Porphyrium</title></head><p>of which there are fragments in Damascenus.</p></div><div><head>9. <title xml:lang="la">De Pythonissa contra Origenem</title></head><p>lost.</p></div><div><head>10. <title xml:lang="la">Commentarii in Cantica Canticorum,</title> fragments.</head><p/></div><div><head>11. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ξένων</foreign>.</head><p>lost, &amp;c.</p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">De Revelatione</title></head><p>This Methodius is said to have written a work, <title xml:lang="la">De
         Revelatione,</title> which, however, is more justly attributed to a later Methodius. [No.
        3.]</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>The principal works of Methodius, viz., <title xml:lang="la">De Libro Arbitro, De
        Resurrectione, De Angelica Virginitate et Castitate,</title> two homilies, and the extracts
       given by Photius were published by Combefis, Graece et Latine, cum notis, Paris, 1644, fol.,
       together with the works of Amphilochus and Andreas Cretensis. <bibl n="Phot. Bibl. 234">Phot.
        Bibl. 234</bibl>. 235, 236, 237; Cave, <title xml:lang="la">Hist. Lit,</title> p. 96, sc.
       ed. Geneva; Fabric. <title xml:lang="la">Bibl. Graec.</title> vol. vii. p. 260, &amp;c.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>This Methodius stands in the index to Fabricius as Methodius Patarensis, which is correct;
       but the passage where the reader finds most information on him (vol. vii. p. 260, &amp;c.) is
       omitted. (Hankius, <title xml:lang="la">Script. Byzant.</title>)</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.P">W.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>