<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mercurius_monachus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mercurius_monachus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="mercurius-monachus-bio-1" n="mercurius_monachus_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Mercu'rius</surname><addName full="yes">Mo'nachus</addName></persName></label></head><div><head>Works</head><div><head>On the Pulse</head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Μερκούριος Μόναχος</label>), the reputed author of a short
        treatise (or fragment) on the Pulse, published at Naples, in Greek and Latin, with notes and
        a long intro. duction, by Salvator Cyrillus, 8vo. 1812. It does not seem to be derived from
        Greek sources, and nothing is known respecting the writer. Some suppose him to have been a
        monk, who lived in the south of Italy, about the tenth century; but Sprengel, in the last
        edition of his <title xml:lang="la">Gesch. der Arzneikunde</title> (ii. p. 560, quoted by
        Choulant in his <title xml:lang="la">Handb. der Bücherkunde für die Aeltere
         Medicin</title>) conjectures that he lived in the thirteenth century, and derived his
        opinions from some one who had travelled in the East,--perhaps Carpini. Cardinal Mai,
        however, in the preface to the fourth volume of his collection <hi rend="ital">Classicor.
         Auctor. e Vatican. Codicib. Editor.</hi> (p. xii. &amp;c.) affirms, apparently from actual
        inspection of some manuscripts containing the work, that it does not belong to Mercurius at
        all, but to a person called <hi rend="ital">Abitianus.</hi> The writer has no means of
        deciding whether this assertion is correct, but it agrees well enough with the proof arising
        from internal evidence that the work is derived from Oriental sources, for this Abitianus
        must be no other than the celebrated Arabic physician Abúi )Alí Ibn
        Síná, commonly called <hi rend="ital">Avicenna.</hi> [<hi rend="smallcaps">ABITIANUS.</hi>] [<ref target="author.W.A.G">W.A.G</ref>]</p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>