<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mercator_marius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mercator_marius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="mercator-marius-bio-1" n="mercator_marius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Merca'tor</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Ma'rius</surname></persName></label></head><p>distinguished among ecclesiastical writers as a most zealous antagonist of the Pelagians and
      the Nestorians, appears to have commenced his literary career during the pontificate of
      Zosimus, <date when-custom="218">A. D. 218</date>, at Rome.</p><p>There he drew up a discourse against the opinions of Coelestius, which he transmitted to
      Africa and received in reply an epistle from St. Augustin, still extant (<hi rend="ital">Ep.</hi> cxciii. ed. Bened.). Having repaired to Constantinople about ten years afterwards,
      for the purpose of counteracting the designs of the banished Julianus [<hi rend="smallcaps">JULIANIUS DIDIUS</hi>], he presented his <title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium</title> to
      Theodosius. He then became deeply involved in the controversy regarding the Incarnation, and
      in this found active occupation for the remainder of his life, which must have extended beyond
      the middle of the fifth century, since we find mention made in his writings of the Eutychians,
      whose name does not appear among the catalogue of heretics, until after the council of
      Chalcedon, held in 451. Mercator seems undoubtedly to have been a layman, but we are
      absolutely ignorant of every circumstance connected with his origin and personal history.
      Hence, in the absence of all ascertained facts, an ample field is thrown open for that
      unprofitable species of labour which seeks to create substance out of shadow; and here the
      exertions of Garnier and Gabriel Gerberon are especially conspicuous, but it would be a mere
      waste of time and space to recount their visions.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The works of Mercator refer exclusively to the Pelagian and Nestorian heresies, and consist
       for the most part, in so far as the latter is concerned, of passages extracted and translated
       from the chief Greek authorities upon both sides, and arranged in such a manner as to enable
       the orthodox to comprehend the doctrines advanced by their opponents, and the arguments by
       which they were confuted.</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">Comnmonitorium super nomine Coelestii</title></head><p>composed originally in Greek, presented in 429 to the emperor Theodosius, and translated
        into Latin some years afterwards. The object of this piece was to procure the expulsion of
        Julianus and Coelestius from Constantinople, by giving a history of the rise and progress of
        their errors, and by exposing the fatal tendency of their doctrines. We <pb n="1046"/> learn
        fRom the full title that this end was accomplished, and that the two hierarchs, with their
        followers, were banished by an imperial edict, and subsequently condemned in the Council of
        Ephesus (231) by the judgment of 275 bishops.</p></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium adversus Haeresin Pelagii et Coelestii vel etiam
         Scripta Juliani</title></head><p>Made up of excerpts from the writings of Julianus, with answers (<hi rend="ital">subnotationes</hi>) annexed by Mercator. Garnier gives to this production the title
         <title>Liber Subnotationum ad Pieritium Presbyteruzn,</title> and considers it as
        consisting of two parts, the first, or <title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium,</title> being a
        preface or introduction; the second, or Subnotationes ad Verba Juliani, forming the main
        body of the work.</p></div><div><head>3. <title xml:lang="la">Refutatio Symmboli Theodori Mopsuestani</title></head><p>An examination of the false doctrine with regard to the Nature of Christ, contained in a
        creed attributed to Theodorus of Mopsuestia, the friend and supporter of Julianus.</p></div><div><head>Other Works</head><p>Of the following it will be enough to give the names :-- <listBibl><bibl>4. <title xml:lang="la">Comparatio Dogmatum Pauli Samosateni et
          Nestorii.</title></bibl><bibl>5. <title xml:lang="la">Sermones V. Nestorii adversus Dei Genitricem
          Mariam.</title></bibl><bibl>6. <title xml:lang="la">Nestorii Epistola ad Cyrillum Alexandrinum.</title></bibl><bibl>7. <title xml:lang="la">Cyrilli Alexandrini Epistola ad Nestorium.</title></bibl><bibl>8. <title xml:lang="la">Cyrilli Alexandrini Epistola secunda ad
          Nestorium.</title></bibl><bibl>9. <title xml:lang="la">Cyrilli Alexandrini Epistola ad Clericos suos.</title></bibl><bibl>10. <title xml:lang="la">Excerpta ex Codicibus Nestorii.</title></bibl><bibl>11. <title xml:lang="la">Nestorii Sermones IV. adversus Haeresim
          Pelagianam.</title></bibl><bibl>12. <title xml:lang="la">Nestorii Epistola ad Coelestium.</title></bibl><bibl>13. <title xml:lang="la">Nestorii Blasphemiarum Capitula,</title> containing the
          replies of Nestorius to the letters of Pope Coelestinus and Cyril of Alexandria.</bibl><bibl>14. <title xml:lang="la"><title xml:lang="la">Synodus Ephesiana adversus
            Nestorium,</title> extracts from those proceedings of this council which were most
           hostile to the views of Nestorius.</title></bibl><bibl>15. <title xml:lang="la">Cyrilli Alexandrini Apologeticus adversus
           Orientales.</title></bibl><bibl>16. <title xml:lang="la">Cyrilli Alexandrini Apologeticus adversus
           Theodoretum.</title></bibl><bibl>17. <title xml:lang="la">Fragmenta Theodoreti, Diodori et Ibae.</title></bibl><bibl>18. <title xml:lang="la">Eutherii Tyanensis Fragmentum.</title></bibl><bibl>19. <title xml:lang="la">Nestorii Epistola ad Papam Coelestinum.</title></bibl><bibl>20. <title xml:lang="la">Epistola Synodica Cyrilli ad Nestorium..</title></bibl><bibl>21. <title xml:lang="la">Cyrilli Scholia de Incarnatione Unigeniti.</title></bibl></listBibl></p></div><div><head>Lost Works</head><p>Among the lost works of this author we may reckon the <title>Libri contra
         Pelagianos,</title> of which we hear in the epistle of St. Augustin (cxciii.). Dupin
        hazards a conjecture that the <title>Hypognosticon,</title> commonly attributed to the
        bishop of Hippo, may be in reality the treatise in question.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>It is remarkable that no ancient writer, if we except St. Augustine in the letter named
       above, takes any notice of Mercator, who remained altogether unknown until the seventeenth
       century, when Holstein discovered a MS. of his works in the Vatican, and soon after a second
       was found by Labbe, in the library of the Chapter of Beauvais. <bibl>Labbe printed the
         <title>Coemmonitorium super Nomine Coelestii,</title> in his collection of councils, fol.
        Paris, 1671, vol. ii. pp. 1512-1517</bibl>; <bibl>a selection from the Vatican MS. was
        published by Gabriel Gerberon, a Benedictine, under the assumed name of Righerius, 12mo.
        Brux. 1673</bibl>, and <bibl>in the same year the first complete edition appeared at Paris
        in folio, under the editorial inspection of the learned Garnier, the text being formed upon
        a comparison of the only two existing MSS.</bibl>
       <bibl>The most esteemed edition is that of Baluze, 8vo. Par. 1684, reprinted with additions
        and corrections, by Galland, in his <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca Patrum,</title> vol.
        viii. pp. 615-737, fol. Venet. 1772.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>A very full account of the labours of Garnier and Balllze will be found in Schönemann,
        <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Patrum Lat.</hi> vol. 2.16. See also Dupin, <hi rend="ital">Ecclesiastical History of the Fifth Century;</hi> the preface of Garnier; and the
       Prolegomena of Galland. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>