<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.megasthenes_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.megasthenes_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="megasthenes-bio-1" n="megasthenes_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1489"><surname full="yes">Mega'sthenes</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Μεγασθένης</label>).</p><p>1. A Greek writer, to whom the subsequent Greek writers were chiefly indebted for their
      accounts of India. Megasthenes was a friend and companion of Seleucus Nicator (Clem. Alex. <hi rend="ital">Strom.</hi> i. p. 305d), and was sent by that monarch as ambassador to
      Sandracottus, king of the Prasii, whose capital was Palibothra, a town, probably, near the
      confluence of the Ganges and Sone in the neighbourhood of the modern Patna. <note anchored="true" place="margin">* Sandracottus is called Chandragupta in the Sanscrit writers and his capital
       Pâtaliptra.</note> (<bibl n="Strabo ii.p.70">Strab. ii. p.70</bibl>, xv. p. 702;
      Arrian, <bibl n="Arr. An. 5.6">Arr. Anab. 5.6</bibl>, <hi rend="ital">Ind.</hi> 5; <bibl n="Plin. Nat. 6.17">Plin. Nat. 6.17</bibl>. s.21.) We know nothing more respecting the
      personal history of Megasthenes, except the statement of Arrian (<hi rend="ital">Anab.
       l.c.</hi>), that he lived with Sibyrtius, the satrap of Arachosia, who obtained the satrapies
      of Arachosia and Gedrosia, in <date when-custom="-323">B. C. 323</date>. (<bibl n="Diod. 18.3">Diod.
       18.3</bibl>.) Whether Megasthenes accompanied <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> or not in his invasion of India, is uncertain. The time at which he was sent
      to Sandracottus, and the reason for which he was sent, are also equally uncertain. Clinton
       (<hi rend="ital">Fasti Hell.</hi> vol. iii. p. 482, note z) places the embassy a little
      before <date when-custom="-302">B. C. 302</date>, since it was about this time that Seleucus
      concluded an alliance with Sandracottus ; but it is no where stated that it was through the
      means of Megasthenes that the alliance was concluded ; and as the latter resided some time at
      the court of Sandracottus, he may have been sent into India at a subsequent period. Since,
      however, Sandracottus died in <date when-custom="-288">B. C. 288</date>, the mission of Megasthenes
      must be placed previous to that year. We have more certain information respecting the parts of
      India which Megasthenes visited. He entered the country through the district of the
      Pentapotamia, of the rivers of which he gave a full account (Arrian, <hi rend="ital">Ind.</hi>
      cc. 4, 8, &amp;c.), and proceeded thence by the royal road to Palibothra, but appears not to
      have visited any other parts of India. (Comp. <bibl n="Strabo xv.p.689">Strab. xv.
       p.689</bibl>.) Most modern writers, from the time of Robertson, have supposed, from a passage
      of Arrian (<foreign xml:lang="grc">πολλάκις δὲ λέγει</foreign> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Μεγασθένης</foreign>) <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀφικέσθαι παρὰ Σανδράκοττον τὸν
       Ἰνδῶν Βασιλέα</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Anab.</hi> 5.6), that Megasthenes paid several
      visits to India, but since neither Megasthenes himself, nor any other writer, alludes to more
      than one visit, these words may simply mean that he had several interviews with Sandracottus
      during his residence in the country.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ Ἰνδικά</foreign></head><p>The work of Megasthenes was entitled <title xml:lang="grc">τὰ Ἰνδικά</title>, and
        was probably divided into four books (<bibl n="Ath. 4.153">Athen. 4.153</bibl>e.; <bibl n="Clem. Al. Strom. i. p. 305">Clem. Al. Strom. i. p. 305</bibl>; <bibl n="Strabo xv.p.687">Strab. xv. p.687</bibl>; Joseph. <hi rend="ital">c. Apion.</hi> 1.20, <hi rend="ital">Ant.</hi> 10.11.1). It appears to have been written in the Attic dialect, and not in the
        Ionic, as some modern writers have asserted; for in the passage of Eusebius (<bibl n="Euseb. Praep. Ev. 9.41">Euseb. Praep. Ev. 9.41</bibl>), which has been quoted to prove
        that Megasthenes employed the Ionic dialect, the quotation from Megasthenes concludes with
        the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">κατοικίσαι</foreign> and the remaining words are an
        extract from Abydenus (comp. Clinton, <hi rend="ital">Fast. Hell.</hi> vol. iii. p. 483,
        note b.). Megasthenes is repeatedly referred to by Arrian, Strabo, Diodorus, and Pliny. Of
        these writers Arrian, on whose judgment most reliance is to be placed, speaks most highly of
        Megasthenes (Arrian, <bibl n="Arr. An. 5.5">Arr. Anab. 5.5</bibl>, <hi rend="ital">Ind.</hi>
        7), but Strabo (<bibl n="Strabo ii.p.70">ii. p.70</bibl>) and Pliny (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) treat him with less respect. Although his work contained many fabulous stories,
        similar to those which we find in the Indica of Ctesias, yet these tales appear not to have
        been fabrications of Megasthenes, but accounts which he received from the natives,
        frequently containing, as modern writers have shown, real truth, though disguised by popular
        legends and fancy. There is every reason for believing that Megasthenes gave a faithful
        account of every thing that fell under his own observation; and the picture which he
        presents of Indian manners and institutions is upon the whole more correct than might have
        been expected.</p></div></div><div><head>Edition</head><p><bibl>Every thing that is known respecting Megasthenes and his work, is collected with
        great diligence by Schwanbeck, in a treatise entitled "Megasthenis Indica. Fragmenta
        collegit, commentationem et indices addidit E. A. Schwanbeck, Bonnae, 1846."</bibl></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>