<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.maximus_confessor_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.maximus_confessor_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="maximus-confessor-bio-1" n="maximus_confessor_1"><head><label xml:id="tlg-2025"><persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Ma'ximus</forename><surname full="yes">Confessor</surname></persName></label></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">ὁ ὁμολουητής</label>), known also as the <hi rend="smallcaps">MONK</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ μοναχός</foreign>), an eminent Greek ecclesiastic
      of the sixth and seventh centuries. He was born at Constantinople about <date when-custom="580">A.
       D. 580</date>. His parents were eminent for their lineage and station, and still more for
      their piety. Maximus was educated with great strictness; and his careful education, diligence,
      and natural abilities enabled him to attain the highest excellence in grammar, rhetoric, and
      philosophy. He gave his especial attention to the last, cherishing the love of truth and
      seeking its attainment, and rejecting all sophistical reasonings.</p><p>His own inclination would have led him to a life of privacy and study, but his merit had
      attracted regard; and Heraclius, who had obtained the Byzantine sceptre in <date when-custom="610">A. D. 610</date>, made him his chief secretary, and treated him with the greatest regard and
      confidence. How long Maximus held his important office is not clear; but long before the death
      of Heraclius (who died A. D. 641), probably about the middle of that emperor's reign, he
      resigned his post; and leaving the palace, embraced a monastic life at Chrysopolis, on the
      Asiatic side of the Bosporus, opposite Constantinople. Here he was distinguished by the
      severity of his ascetic practices, and was soon appointed hegumenus or abbot of his
      monastery.</p><p>Maximus did not spend his life at Chrysopolis: he withdrew into Africa (i. e. the Roman
      province so called, of which Carthage was the capital); but at what time and on what account
      is not clear. Whether Maximus returned to Chrysopolis is not known: he was still in Africa in
       <date when-custom="645">A. D. 645</date>, when he had his disputation with Pyrrhus, the deposed
      patriarch of Constantinople, in the presence of the patrician, Gregorius [<hi rend="smallcaps">GREGORIUS</hi>, historical, No. 4] and the bishops of the province. He had already
      distinguished himself by his zealous exertions to impede the spread of the Monothelite heresy,
      which he had induced the African bishops to anathematise in a provincial council. In this
      disputation, so cogent were the arguments of Maximus, that pyrrhus owned himself vanquished,
      and recanted his heresy, to which, however, he subsequently returned, and ultimately (<date when-custom="654">A. D. 654</date> or 655) recovered his see. Maximus, apparently on the accession
      of Martin I. to the papal throne (<date when-custom="649">A. D. 649</date>), went to Rome, and so
      successfully stimulated the zeal of the new pope against the Monothelites, that he convoked
      the council of Lateran, in which the heresy and all its abettors were anathematized. This step
      so irritated the emperor, Constans II., who had endeavoured to extinguish the controversy by a
      "Typus " (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Τύρος</foreign>) or edict, forbidding all discussion of
      the subject [<hi rend="smallcaps">CONSTANS</hi> II.], that on various pretexts he ordered
       (<date when-custom="653">A. D. 653</date>) the pope and Maximus, with two disciples of the latter,
      Anastasius Apocrisiarius and another Anastasins, and several of the Western (probably Italian)
      bishops to be sent as prisoners to Constantinople. The pope arrived at Constantinople <date when-custom="654">A. D. 654</date>, and was treated with great severity; and after some time was
      exiled to Chersonae, in the Chersonesus Taurica or Crimea, where he died <date when-custom="655">A.
       D. 655</date>. Maximus, the time of whose arrival is not stated, was repeatedly examined, and
      afterwards sentenced to banishment at Bizya, in Thrace. The two Anastasii were also banished,
      but to different places; Maximus was not suffered to remain at peace in his place of exile.
      Theodosius, bishop of the Bithynian Caesareia, and two nobles, Paulus and another Theodosius,
      and <pb n="989"/> some others, were sent to him apparently to get him to renounce his
      opposition to the Monothelites. Blows, kicks, and spitting, were resorted to by the messengers
      and their servants, but in vain; nothing could shake his firmness. He was brought back after
      some time to Constantinople, and subjected to still greater severities. He was severely
      scourged; and the two Anastasii, who had been also brought back to the city, were similarly
      treated, apparently in his presence. They were then all remanded to prison, but were brought
      out again in a few days, when their tongues were cut out, their right hands cut off, and they
      were again sent into exile. Maximus, from age and the effects of his tortures, was scarcely
      able to bear the journey. They were confined in separate places in the Caucasus, where Maximus
      and one of the Anastasii soon died from the effects of their sufferings, <date when-custom="662">A.
       D. 662</date>. Anastasius Apocrisiarius survived, and his recital of their sufferings is one
      of the authorities employed for this article. Various miraculous circumstances were reported
      to have attended the sufferings of these unhappy men. (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὸν
       Βίον, κ.τ.λ.</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">In Vitam ac Certamen S. Patris nostri ac
       Confessoris Maximi</hi>, published by Combéfis in his edition of the works of Maximus.
      This biography is not by Anastasius Apocrisiarius, as Fabricius has erroneously stated (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graee.</hi> vol. ix. p. 635, and vol. x. p. 291); but Combéfis has
      subjoined some other ancient documents, including the narrative of Anastasius Apocrisiarius,
      already noticed, and has added some valuable notes. Theophan. <hi rend="ital">Chronog.</hi>
      pp. 275, 276, 288, ed. Paris, pp. 219, 229, ed. Venice, vol. i. p. 509, 510, 530, 531, ed.
      Bonn; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> ad ann. 645, vol. i. p. 585; Fahric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. ix. p. 635; Bolland. <hi rend="ital">Acta Santor.
       August.</hi> vol. iii. p. 97, &amp;c.)</p><p>Maximus is reverenced as a saint both by the Greek and Latin churches; by the former his
      memory is celebrated on the 21st of January, and the 12th and 13th August; by the latter on
      the 13th August.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Major Works</head><p>The writings of this father were in the middle ages held in the highest esteem, and
        possessed considerable authority. The more discriminating judgment of Photius has severely
        criticised the style of his <title xml:lang="grc">Ἀποήματα γραφικά</title>, <hi rend="ital">Dubia S. Scrip turae,</hi> or rather <foreign xml:lang="grc">Γραφικῶν
         ἀπορημάτων λύσεις</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Dubiorum S. Scripturae Solationes.</hi> He
        notices his long, spun-out sentences, his frequent transpositions and circumlocutions, and
        his metaphors, so carelessly and awkwardly employed as to render his meaning often very
        obscure, and making his works very wearisome to read. He charges him with wandering from his
        subject, and indulging in irrelevant and abstract speculations. Photius, however, is less
        severe in criticising his other works, and observes that all his writings in every part
        manifest the purity and earnestness of his piety. (Phot. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.</hi> Cod.
        192-195.) His orthodoxy on some points is questionable.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>Various of his pieces were published in the course of the sixteenth and seventeenth
         centuries, either separately or in the different collections of the writings of the
         fathers, sometimes in the original, sometimes in a Latin version. The only considerable
         collection of his works is that of <bibl>Combefis, <hi rend="ital">S. Maximi Confessoris,
           Graecorum Theologi, eximiique philosophi Opera,</hi> 2 vols. fol. Paris, 1675.</bibl> An
         introduction contains the ancient biography of Maximus, and some other ancient pieces
         relating to his history; and the works are in some cases accompanied by ancient anonymous
         Greek scholia, as well as by the notes of the learned editor. This edition is not complete:
         a third volume was in preparation by Combéfis at the time of his death, <date when-custom="1679">A. D. 1679</date>; but no successor undertook to complete the unfinished
         labour.</p></div></div><div><head>Miscellaneous Works</head><p>The works are too numerous, and many of them too unimportant for distinct notice. The
        following are the most important:--</p><p>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πρὸς Θαλάσσιον τὸν ὁσιώτατον πρεσβύτερον καὶ
         ἡγούμενον περὶ διαφόρων ἀπόρων τῆς Δείας γραφῆς</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Ad
         Sanctissimum Presbyterum ac Praepositum Thalassium, de variis Scripturae Sacrae
         Quaestionibus ac Dubiis.</hi> This is the work already noticed as severely criticised in
        respect of style by Photius: it contains the solution of sixty-five scriptural difficulties,
        and is accompanied by the <title>Scholia</title> of an anonymous commentator, apparently of
        the close of the eleventh or beginning of the twelfth century.</p><p>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὴν προσευχὴν τοῦ Πάτερ ἡμῶν πρός τινα
         φιλόχριστον ἑρμενεία σύντομος</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Orationis Dominicae brevis
         Expositio, ad quendam Christo devotum.</hi></p><p>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λόγος ἀσκητικὸς κατὰ πεῦσιν καὶ ἀπόκρισιν</foreign>,
         <hi rend="ital">Liber ad Pietatem exercens per Interrogationem et Responsionem.</hi> This
        piece had been published by Fl. Nobilius, with some small pieces of Chrysostom and Basil,
        Rome, 1578.</p><p>4. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κεφάλαια περὶ ἀγάπης</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Capita
         de Charitate.</hi> This work, to which an ancient Greek writer has added <hi rend="ital">Scholia,</hi> was published by Vicentius Opsopoeus (who ascribed the work to Maximus of
        Turin), with a Latin version, 8vo. Haguenau, 1531, and was repeatedly reprinted in the
        course of the same century; and a Latin version was given in most of the editions of the
         <title>Bibliotheca Patrum.</title></p><p>5. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Θεολοψίας καὶ τῆς ἐνσάρκου οἰκονομίας τοῦ
         υἱοῦ Θεοῦ σ́</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Ad Theologiam Deique Filii in Carne
         Dispensationem spectantia Capita Ducenta.</hi></p><p>6. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κεφάλαια διάφορα Δεολοψικά τε καὶ
        ὀκονομικὰ</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ περὶ ἀρετῆς καὶ κακίας</foreign>,
         <hi rend="ital">Diversa Capita ad Thelogiam et Oeconomiam spectantia, deque Virtute ac
         Vitio,</hi> first published by Joannes Picus. 8vo. Paris, 1560.</p><p>7. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῆς ἁψίας Τριάδος διάλοψοι έ</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Dialoyi quinque de Sancta Trinitate.</hi> These are ascribed to Maximus in
        several MSS., and by various ancient Greek writers who have cited them. Other writers have,
        however, ascribed them to Athanasius, in some editions of whose works they consequently
        appear. The opinion of Garnier, that they are the production of Theodoret, has been
        generally rejected; and the preponderance of evidence seems to be decidedly in favour of the
        authorship of Maximus.</p><p>8. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Μυσταψωψια περὶ τοῦ τίνων σύμβολα τὰ κατὰ τὴν ἁψίαν
         ἐκκλησιαν ἐπὶ τῆς συνάεεως τελούμενα καφέστηκε</foreign>. <hi rend="ital">Mystagogia
         qua explicantur quorum Signa sint quae in Sacra Ecclesia peraguntur in Divina Synaxi s.
         Collecta.</hi> This was published by David Hoeschelius, Augsburg, 1599; and afterwards in
        the <title>Auctarium</title> of Ducaeus, vol. ii. fol. Paris, 1624.</p><p>9. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κεφάλαια Δεολοψικά, ἤτοι ἐκλοψαὶ ἐκ διαφόρων
         Βιβλίων τῶν τε καθ̓ ἡμᾶς καὶ τῶν γύραφεν</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Capita
         Thelogica, id est scite dicta atque electa ex Diversis tum Christianorum turn Gentilium ac
         Profanorum Libris;</hi> or more briefly, <hi rend="ital">Sermones per Excerpta,</hi> or
        Loci <hi rend="ital">Communes.</hi> This selection of sentences is arranged in seventy-one
         <foreign xml:lang="grc">λόψοι</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Sermones,</hi> and has been
        repeatedly published. It first appeared, with the similar compilation of Antonins Mlissa
         [<hi rend="smallcaps">ANTONIUS</hi> No. 2], under the care of <pb n="990"/> Conrad Gesner,
        fol Zurich, 1546; and a Latin version was given in the first edition of De la Bigne's <hi rend="ital">Bibliotheca Patrum,</hi> fol. Paris, 1579.</p><p>10. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Παρασημείωσις τῆς γενομένης ζητήσεως, κ. τ.
        λ</foreign>., <hi rend="ital">Acta Disputationis,</hi> &amp;c.; a record of the discussion
        between Pyrrhus and Maximus in the presence of the patrician Gregory in Africa, already
        referred to. It was published by Baronius, with a Latin version by Turrianus, as an appendix
        to the 8th vol. of his <title xml:lang="la">Annales Ecclesiastici;</title> and reprinted
        from thence in the <title>Concilia.</title></p><p>11. <hi rend="ital">Epistolae, partim communes, partim dogmaticae et polemicae.</hi> The
        other works given in the edition of Combéfis are shorter and of little value, except
        as materials for a history of the Monothelite controversy, to which several of them
        refer.</p></div><div><head>Works not in Combéfis but published elsewhere</head><p>The following works of Maximus, not included in the collection of Combéfis, have
        been published elsewhere:--</p><p>12. <hi rend="ital">Fragments,</hi> incorporated in the <hi rend="ital">Catenae</hi> of
        the Fathers on the Sacred Books, and especially on the expository paraphrase of Solomon's
        Song (<hi rend="ital">Expositio Cantici Canticorum per Paraphrasin collecta ex Gregorii
         Nysseni, Nili, et Maximi Commentariis),</hi> contained in the <title>Auctarium</title> of
        Ducaeus, vol. ii. fol. Paris, 1624.</p><p>13. <hi rend="ital">Scholia</hi> on the works of the pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, first
        published with the works of Dionysius, 8vo. Paris, 1562, and repeatedly reprinted. Maximus
        earnestly contends that these are the genuine works of the Areopagite converted by St.
        Paul.</p><p>14. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐξήγησια κεφαλαιώδης περὶ τοῦ κατὰ Χρεστὸν τὸν
         Θεὸν ἡμῶν σωτηρίου πάσχα, τὸ διαψραφὲν κανόνιον ἑρμηνεύουσα</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Brenis Enarration Christiani Paschatis, qua descripti Laterculi ratio
         declaratur,</hi> or <hi rend="ital">Computus Ecclesiasticus.</hi> This calculation of
        Easter was drawn up by Maximus, according to his own declaration (pars iii. cap. 9), in the
        fourteenth indiction, in the thirty-first year of Heraclius (i. e. <date when-custom="640">A. D.
         640</date>). Scaliger, in his <title xml:lang="la">Emendatio Temporum,</title> lib. vii. p.
        736, gave considerable extracts from the work, and it was first published entire in the
         <title>Uranologion</title> of Petavius, p. 313, fol. Paris, 1630.</p><p>15. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἄπορα</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Ambigua sive Difficilia
         Loca in Orationibus quibusdam Gregorii Nazianzeni explanata, ad Joannem Cyzici
         Episcopum.</hi> These <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἄπορα</foreign> were translated into
        Latin by Joannes Scotus Erigena about the middle of the ninth century; and the work itself,
        with the version, or perhaps only a part of them, was edited by Thomas Gale, with some of
        the works of Erigena, folio, Oxford, 1681. It is preceded by a letter of Maximus to Joannes
        of Cyzicus. Gale also added the following work of Maximus,</p><p>16. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ διαφόρων ἀπόρων τῶν ἁψίων Διονυσίου καὶ
         Γρηγορίου</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">De variis Difficilibus Locis Dionysii Areopagitae et
         Gregorii Nazianzeni,</hi> with a Latin version by the editor himself.</p><p>17. A <hi rend="ital">Fragment,</hi> thought to be from the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἄπορα</foreign> just mentioned (No. 15), is given in the <title>Appendix</title> to the
        fourteenth volume of Galland's <hi rend="ital">Bibliotheca Patrum,</hi> fol. Venice, 1781.
        The fragment is entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Θεωρία σύντομος πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας
         προϋπάρχειν καὶ μεφυπάρχειν τῶν σωμάτων τὰς ψυχάς</title>, <hi rend="ital">Animaduersio breuis ad eos qui dicunt Animas ante vel post Corpora existere.</hi></p></div><div><head>Other Lost or Unpublished Works</head><p>There are some other works of Maximus either lost, or at least unpublished, which are
        enumerated by Fabricius.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Combefis, <hi rend="ital">S. Maximi Opera;</hi> Phot. <hi rend="ital">l.c.;</hi> Cave, <hi rend="ital">l.c.;</hi> Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. viii. p. 430, vol. ix.
       pp. 599, &amp;c., 635, &amp;c., vol. x. pp. 238, 736, vol. xii. p. 707; <hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. v. ed. Labbe, vol. iii. ed. Hardouin, vol. x. ed. Mansi; Oudin, <hi rend="ital">De Scriptor. et Script. Eccles.</hi> vol. i. col. 1635, &amp;c.; Ceillier, <hi rend="ital">Auteurs Sacrés,</hi> vol. xvii. p. 689, &amp;c.; Galland, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum. Proleg. ad Append. Vol. XIV. c.</hi> 10.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.J.C.M">J.C.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>