<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mauricius_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.mauricius_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="mauricius-bio-2" n="mauricius_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-3075"><surname full="yes">Mauri'cius</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Μαυρίκιος</surname></persName>), FLA'VIUS TIBE'RIUS,
      one of the greatest emperors of Constantinople (<date when-custom="582">A. D. 582</date>--(620), was
      descended from an ancient Roman family which settled in Asia Minor, perhaps some centuries
      previous to his birth, which took place about <date when-custom="539">A. D. 539</date>, in the town
      of Arabissus. in Cappadocia. We give the genealogy of his family so far as it is known:--</p><p><figure/></p><p>Maurice spent his youth at the court of the emperor Justin II.; and although he undoubtedly
      served also in the army, his name does not become conspicuous in history previous to 578. At
      that period he was comes cubiculorum; and Tiberius had no sooner succeeded Justin (<bibl n="Just. 578">578</bibl>) than he appointed Maurice magister militum, and gave him the
      command in Mesopotamia against the Persians, in place of the general Justinian, with whose
      military conduct the emperor was not satisfied. As Tiberius was considered to be the greatest
      captain of his time, he would not have entrusted so important a command to an inexperienced
      courtier, and consequently one cannot but infer that he was perfectly acquainted with the
      great capabilities of Maurice. The event fully justified the emperor's choice. A truce of
      three years had been made between Persia and the empire, extending to the whole of the
      frontier except Armenia, where war was carried on as before. But Chosroes violated the truce,
      and invaded Mesopotamia before the Romans were at all aware of his hostile intentions. At this
      critical moment Maurice arrived in Mesopotamia, and forthwith began by restoring the relaxed
      discipline of the troops: one of his first measures was the re-establishment of the ancient
      custom of the legions never going to rest at night before fortifying their camp. This custom
      had long since been neglected; and the favourite manoeuvre of the Persians of surprising the
      Romans in the night was thus rendered abortive. At the opening of the campaign, however, the
      Persian general, Tamchosroes, made himself master of the important fortress of Thomane, and
      pushed as far as Amida. Maurice soon drove him back, and in his turn invaded the province of
      Arzanene, sending some detachments beyond the Tigris. The first campaign ended without any
      decisive battle. In the second campaign, 579, Maurice and his excellent lieutenant Narses-who
      must not be confounded with Narses, the general of Justinianmade a successful invasion of
      Media, and took up their winter-quarters in Mesopotamia. In 580 he crossed the Euphrates at
      Circesium (Circessus or Cercusium), a town situated in the angle made by the Chaboras joining
      the Euphrates, with a view of marching across the desert upon Ctesiphon. His plan was
      frustrated through the treachery of some Arab allies, and he found himself unexpectedly
      compelled to make head against the main army of the Persians. The contest was sharp, and ended
      with a total overthrow of the Persians, who evacuated whatever places they held in
      Mesopotamia, and fled in confusion beyond the Euphrates. Now Chosroes offered peace, but
      Maurice peremptorily demanded the restoration of the great fortress of Dara, the bulwark of
      the empire, declining to accept any indemnity in money, and the war was renewed with more fury
      than before (581). A pitched battle, in which the Persian army was almost annihilated, and
      their commander, Tamchosroes, died the death of a hero, concluded the war, to the advantage of
      the Romans, and Maurice hastened to Constantinople to surprise the emperor and the nation with
      the welcome news that the most dangerous enemy of Greece was humbled, and peace restored to
      the East. This was more than what even Tiberius expected; and Maurice having gained universal
      popularity by his brilliant victories, the emperor invited him to enter Constantinople in
      triumph (582). <pb n="976"/></p><p>Soon afterwards the brave Tiberius fell dangerously ill; and feeling his end approach,
      assembled the senate, and proposed Maurice as his successor. His touching speech met with no
      opposition; Constantinople was in rapture; and the dying emperor increased the joy of his
      subjects by giving his eldest daughter Constantina in marriage to Maurice. A few days
      afterwards Tiberius died (13th of August, 582); and the fortunate Maurice now ascended the
      throne.</p><p>His mature age (43) was a guarantee to the nation that the rapid fortune of their new master
      was not likely to turn his head; and indeed he did not deceive their expectation, although his
      reign was an uninterrupted series of wars. We shall first speak of the Persian war.</p><p>Maurice had scarcely ascended the throne, and given proof of his forbearance, by pardoning
      instead of punishing various persons who had been guilty of treason, when news came from the
      Persian frontier that Hormisdas, the son of Chosroes, had broken the peace, and attacked the
      empire. Before the end of the year (582) John Mystacon, the commander-in-chief in those
      quarters, engaged in a pitched battle with the Persians near the of the Nymphius and the
      Tigris; but although the Romans fought with great valour, the day was lost, through the
      jealousy of one of their generals, Curs, and their army was dispersed. They suffered another
      defeat at Acbas, and Mystacon was compelled, through misfortune and illness, to spend the
      whole season of 583 on the defensive. Maurice, dissatisfied with his conduct, recalled him,
      and sent Philippus or Philippicus in his stead, having previously given him his sister Gordia
      in marriage. This general would have ventured some decisive blow in 584, but his army was
      decimated famine, diseases, and fatigues; he took the offensive in 585, but performed nothing
      particular. In 586 Philippicus at last brought the enemy to a stand at Solacon, not far from
      Dara, and obtained a decisive victory, which he owed especially to his infantry, which, until
      the time of Maurice, was made little use of in the later wars in the East. The Persian army
      was nearly destroyed. A strong body of their veterans, however, reached safely a hill at some
      distance from the field of battle, where they entrenched themselves, but were routed, with
      great slaughter, by the Roman, Stephanus. Now Philippicus invaded Arzanene. He was in sight of
      another Persian army, and ready to fight them, when some trifling circumstance caused such a
      panic among his troops, that they gave way to the impulse, and fled in the utmost confusion.
      The Persians followed them without loss of time, took and plundered the baggage, and pursued
      them as far as Amida. Philippicus fell ill through grief, for the fruit of his great victory
      at Solacon seemed to be entirely lost; and being unable to appear in the field, he gave the
      command to Heraclius, Andreas and Theodore of Addea. Heraclius, who afterwards became emperor,
      retrieved the fortune of the Romans, and gave such splendid proofs of his military skill,
      that, Philippicus having been recalled in 588, he was entrusted with the temporary
      command-in-chief till the arrival of Priscus, whom the emperor had despatched to supersede
      Philippicus. The latter was so extremely jealous of his successor, that lie employed treason
      in order to avenge himself for the insult, and kindled a rebellion among the troops which
      threatened to ruin the emperor's affairs in the East. They refused to acknowledge Priscus,
      forced Germanus to take the supreme command, and deposed all officers with whom they were
      displeased, choosing others in their stead. In this emergency Aristobulus arrived, whom
      Maurice had sent into Mesopotamia, immediately upon being informed of the mutiny; and this
      able man having gained some ascendancy over the rioters, availed himself of his advantage, and
      together with Heraclius led the army, who were then encamped under the walls of Martyropolis
      (on the Nymphius, in Sophene) against the main body of the Persians, who approached to besiege
      that great fortress. The Romans carried the day; but in the pride of victory the soldiers once
      more raised the standard of rebellion. At his critical time, Gregory, bishop of Antioch,
      arrived, as the emperor's plenipotentiary, and he at last succeeded in soothing the turbulent
      spirit of the legions, and prevailed upon them to obey Philippicus as their
      commander-in-chief. This was ex actly what this ambitious man wished for; but as he was unable
      to do honour to his important funetion, when he had obtained it in a fair way, he junction was
      found to be still less competent now his mind was inflated by unfair success (589). His first
      act of incompetency was the loss of Martyropolis, of which the Persians made themselves master
      by a stratagem and the recapture of the fortress became next to impossible, when, through his
      carelessness, a strong body of Persians was allowed to relieve the garrison. Maurice was
      extremely vexed at these proceedings, and full of rancour against all those who had promoted
      the mutiny; he showed no further indulgence to his brother-in-law, but deprived him of his
      post, and appointed Comentiolus in his place. by This was the very man who commanded those
      legions which first mutinied in 588. This faithless and incompetent general would have made a
      sorry figure but for the aid of the gallant Heraclius: at the battle of Sisarbene he was among
      the first who took to flight; and the Romans seemed to be lost when Heraclius restored order,
      and gained one of the most glorious victories ever obtained over the Persians: the camp of the
      enemy was taken, and an immense booty sent to Constantinople, creating the most unlimited
      satisfaction and joy in the court as well as in the town. Soon afterwards Acbas was re-taken
      by Heraclius; and affairs speedily took a turn in favour of the Romans, by a commotion in
      Persia, which, on account of its important consequences for the empire, deserves a short
      explanation. While the Roman arms became more and more dangerous, Hormisdas concluded an
      alliance with the Turks in Bactriana (Turkistan), whose khan consequently came to his apparent
      relief with a host of some hundred thousand marauders on horseback. They behaved like allies
      till they had quartered themselves on the frontier of Media, when they altered their conduct,
      and it became manifest that they had made a secret alliance with Maurice; and being now in the
      heart of Persia, were ready to fall upon the rear of the royal armies engaged in Mesopotamia.
      In this extremity Persia was saved by Baram, a general highly distinguished for his former
      campaigns against the Romans, who attacked the Turks in the passes of the Hyrcanian mountain,
      and gave them such a bloody lesson, that they desisted from further hostile attempts. Baram
      was rewarded with ingratitude for he was deprived of his command, and <pb n="977"/> insulted
      in a most poignant manner. Compelled to rebel or to lose his head, he took up arms against the
      king, and a general defection ensued, during which Hormisdas was seized and blinded by
      Bindoes, a prince of royal blood, who had been ill-treated by his master. Chosroes, the son of
      Hormisdas, now ascended the throne, with the consent of Bindoes, and prepared for marching
      against Baram. The royal troops were defeated, Chosroes fled into the Roman territory, and
      during the ensuing troubles in Persia the blinded king, Hormisdas, was murdered by Bindoes,
      or, as Theophylact states, beaten to death by order of his own son, Chosroes. Gibbon rejects
      the latter account. When Chosroes, with a few attendants, suddenly arrived at the gates of
      Circesium, the Roman commander would scarcely trust his own eyes, and immediately requested
      him to remove to the more stately city of Hierapolis, whence the king sent a touching letter
      to Maurice, imploring his generous aid for the recovery of his throne. When our pride is
      flattered, our honour satisfied, and our heart moved at one and the same time, human nature
      seldom withstands the dictates of its better feelings ; Maurice shed tears when he read the
      letter, and granted his protection to the royal fugitive. A powerful army, under the command
      of Narses, was assembled on the frontier; loyal Persians flocked to the Roman camp to serve
      their legitimate sovereign ; Narses and Chosroes entered Persia; and in a decisive battle at
      Balarath they routed the rebel Baram, whose troops were dispersed, while he himself fled into
      Turkistan, where he met with an untimely death, either by poison or grief. Chosroes now
      re-ascended the throne of his ancestors (591), and peace and friendship reigned henceforth
      between Persia and the empire as long as Maurice sat on the throne. Dara and Martyropolis, the
      bulwarks of Mesopotamia, and the objects of so many a bloody contest, were given to Maurice as
      a reward or on condition of his assistance.</p><p>We now turn to the war with the Avars, of which our account must be brief. The first war
      against the chagan or khan of these barbarians, who ruled over an extent of country nearly
      equal to that which once obeyed Attila, broke out in 587. Comentiolus, who commanded against
      them, being unfortunate, Mystacon was sent to supersede him, although he could not boast of
      much success in Persia. But his lieutenant Droctulf, a German, who had long served in the
      imperial armies, watched over the blunders of his chief, and in a pitched battle so utterly
      discomfited the Avars, that the khan refrained from any incursion during the following five
      years. The next war broke out some time after the peace with Persia, and Maurice had leisure
      to withdraw a great portion of from Asia, and employ them against the Avars. He intended to
      put himself at their head, but it was already customary at the court of Constantinople that
      the emperor should not command in the field, and he consequently gave way to the remonstrances
      of the senate, and sent Priscus in his stead, who, however, was soon superseded by the
      emperor's brother Peter. The choice was a bad one, and as early as 598 Priscus resumed the
      supreme command. He was less successful than was expected, though he was an excellent general,
      and in 600 the army received a new commander in the person of Comentiolus, that faithless and
      cowardly intriguer, whose conduct had been so very suspicious in Asia. In appointing him,
      Maurice committed either a great blunder or secretly wished to ruin him. Comentiolus had no
      sooner taken the field, when he suffered a severe defeat from the chagan: 12,000 Romans
      remained prisoners of war with the Avars. We shall speak hereafter of their fate, an evert
      intimately connected with that of the emperor. The honour of the Roman arms was restored in
      five successful battles by the gallant Priscus, but Comentiolus thwarted his plans by
      intrigues and treacherous manoeuvres, and at last Priscus was again put at the head of the
      army. In the autumn of 602 he intended to winter along the southern bank of the Danube, when
      Maurice ordered him to take up his quarters on the northern side, where they would have been
      exposed to the attacks of the Avars. Some pretend that Maurice gave this order for the purpose
      of paring the magazines within the empire; but it would seem as if he rather intended to
      punish those troops for previous acts of disobedience and mutiny, by assigning them
      winter-quarters in an inhospitable country. However this may be, the measure was imprudent,
      and proved the ruin of the emperor.</p><p>Gibbon observes with great justness, that, while in the camp alone the emperors ought to
      have exercised a despotic command, it was only in the camps that his authority was disobeyed
      and insuited. The spirit of mutiny and arrogance in the army, that hereditary cancer of Roman
      administration, reigned unabated when Maurice took the reins of government, and he who met
      with blind obedience when a mere magister militum, had to encounter that dangerous mutiny of
      his Persian army immediately upon exchanging the baton for the sceptre. Nor was this the only
      outbreak, though the others were of less magnitude. It has been told above that 12,000 Romans
      were made prisoners of war by the Avars. The trifling sum of 6000 pieces of gold was demanded
      for their ransom. Maurice, moved by avarice, as some say, refused to pay it, and now 12,000
      veterans were put to death by their captors. The army and the nation were deeply indignant at
      this atrocious deed, and cursed Maurice for his abominable conduct. However, in acting as he
      did, the emperor had a powerful though secret motive: those 12,000 were the soldiers of
      Comentiolus, it was they who had chiefly caused the great mutiny during the Persian war; and
      in abandoning them to the fury of barbarians, he at once assuaged his resentment and got rid
      of a band of dangerous mercenaries. But his conscience continually reproached him with this
      barbarous act. He wrote to the most eminent divines of his realm, to receive consolation from
      their censure or their indulgence; he tried to forget his forces his pangs by redoubled
      activity in the cabinet. It was all in vain: he neither recovered the peace of his soul nor
      the love of his subjects; and the army bore such hatred against him, that they only seemed to
      wait for a suitable pretext to break out in open rebellion. His own imprudence furnished them
      with an opportunity, by ordering them, in the autumn of 602, to take up their winter-quarters
      on the Avarian side of the Danube. They complained that the emperor desired to sacrifice them,
      like their 12,000 brethren. They held tumultuous meetings, which the emperor's brother Peter
      tried in vain to counteract; and Phocas having been chosen by them for the command-in-chief,
      Peter had no alternative left but escaping secretly, and <pb n="978"/> carrying the news of
      the revolt to the emperor in Constantinople. There the green faction assumed a threatening
      attitude, and information having reached them that Phocas was marching upon Constantinople,
      such a commotion arose in the capital, that Maurice thought it best to fly into the provinces,
      and there to prepare for resistance. He effected his escape by sea, together with his wife and
      children. A storm compelled him to land near the church of St. Autonomus, not far from
      Chalcedon. Thence he despatched his eldest son Theodosius to the court of Chosroes, to implore
      him to confer the same favour upon the emperor which the emperor had once conferred upon the
      king. Maurice with his family took sanctuary in the church of St. Autonomus: he was tortured
      by sufferings of body and despair of mind. During this time Phocas arrived in Constantinople,
      and was proclaimed emperor on the 23d of November, 602. He immediately sent executioners in
      search of Maurice, who was dragged with his family from the sanctuary to the scaffold. Five of
      his sons, Tiberius, Petrus, Paulus, Justin, and Justinian, had their heads cut off while their
      father stood by praying, but not trembling, awaiting the fatal stroke in his turn. He was
      murdered on the 27th of November, 602; his eldest son Theodosius, who had not proceeded far on
      his way to Persia, was arrested, and shared his fate soon afterwards. The empress and three of
      her daughters were thrown into prison, but in 605, or perhaps 607, they were likewise put to
      death, and their bodies thrown into the sea. The heads of Maurice and his sons were carried on
      pikes to Phocas, who, after having enjoyed the sight for some time, gave orders for the
      execution of Petrus, the brother of Maurice, Comentiolus, Constantine Lardys, and a great
      number of other persons of distinction. [<hi rend="smallcaps">PHOCAS.</hi>]</p><p>Among the papers of the murdered emperor was found his will, which he had made in the
      fifteenth year of his reign (597), and by which he left Constantinople and the East to
      Theodosius; Rome, Italy and the Islands, to his second son Tiberius. Maurice was indeed
      preparing for wresting Italy from the Lombards, and might have carried his plan into
      execution, but for the great wars against the Persians and the Avars. Although greater as a
      general than as a king, Maurice was yet one of the best emperors of the East. Constantly
      active, he knew no other pleasure than that which arises from doing one's duty; he was firm
      without being obstinate, bold yet prudent, and both severe or forbearing according to
      circumstances. He was completely master of his passions and appetites, sober to the extreme, a
      loving and virtuous husband and father, and full of filial piety. No sooner was he informed of
      the intentions of the emperor Tiberius towards him, than he entreated his father Paulus and
      his mother Joanna to come to Constantinople, and they were both present at his marriage with
      the princess Constantina. They continued to live at his court, and his father became one of
      his most influential ministers: the fame of Paulus as a wise and well-disposed man spread
      abroad, and the views of Maurice upon Italy being likely to lead to either an alliance or a
      war with the Franks in Gaul, their king Childebert wrote a letter to Paulus on that subject,
      which is given in <hi rend="ital">Hist. Francor.</hi> vol. i. p. 869, A natural and timely
      death in 593 saved Paulus from being involved in the wholesale murder of the imperial family.
      Maurice is said to have loved money too much; but he was so far from oppressing his subjects
      from taxes, that, on the contrary, he lowered them considerably; on one occasion he took off
      one-third of the land-tax. Arts and sciences were protected by this great emperor, who
      possessed considerable learning.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Maurice wrote twelve books on the military art, which have fortunately come down to
       posterity and are entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Στρατηγικά</title>.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>The <foreign xml:lang="grc">Στρατηγικά</foreign> were published with a Latin version,
        together with Arrian's " Tactica," by <bibl>John Scheffer, Upsala, 1664, 8vo.</bibl> The
        text contains 382 half pages, and the version as much; the editor added 157 pages of notes,
        and a few pages with very curious representations of the different battle arrays spoken of
        in the work.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Theophylact. Simocatta, <hi rend="ital">Vita Mauricii</hi> ; Evagr. lib. v. vi.; Theoph. p.
       213, &amp;c.; Cedren. p. 394, &amp;c.; Zonar. vol. ii. p. 70, &amp;c. ; Menander, p. 124,
       &amp;c.; Niceph. Call. 18.5, &amp;c.</p><p><figure/></p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.P">W.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>