<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.magnus_9</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:M.magnus_9</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="M"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="magnus-bio-9" n="magnus_9"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Magnus</surname></persName></head><p>6. The Magnus who lived after Themison, about the same time as Archigenes, or a littie
      earlier, and who belonged to the medical sect of the Pneumatici (Galen, <hi rend="ital">De
       Differ. Puls.</hi> 3.2, vol. viii. p. 646), was also probably a different person from any of
      the preceding, and lived in the latter half of the second century after Christ. He wrote a
      work, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῶν Ἐφευρημένων μετὰ τοὺς Θεμίσωνος
       Χρόνους</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">De Inventis post Themisonis Tempora,</hi> consisting of
      at least three books (Gal. <hi rend="ital">ibid.</hi> p. 641), from which several passages are
      quoted by Galen relating to the pulse (<hi rend="ital">ibid.</hi> pp. 640, 641,756). On this
      subject Magnus differed in several points from Archigenes, by whom some of his opinions were
      controverted. (Gal. <hi rend="ital">De Caus. Puls.</hi> 1.4, vol. ix. pp. 8,18, 21, Id. <hi rend="ital">De Differ. Puls.</hi> vol. viii. pp. 638, 640, &amp;c.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>