<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lucius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lucius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="lucius-bio-1" n="lucius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Lu'cius</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Λεύκιος</surname></persName>).</p><p>1. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">ADRIANOPLE</hi> or <hi rend="smallcaps">HADRIANOPLE</hi>, was
      bishop of that city in the fourth century, succeeding, though Tillemont doubts if immediately,
      St. Eutropius. He was expelled from his see by the Arian party, then predominant in the East,
      under the emperor Constantius II., the son of Constantine the Great; and went to Rome to lay
      his cause before the pope, Julius I., apparently in the year 340 or 341. Several other bishops
      were at Rome on a similar errand, about the same time; and the pope, having satisfied himself
      or their innocence and of their orthodoxy, sent them back to their respective churches, with
      letters requiring their restoration, and other letters rebuking their persecutors. The
      Oriental bishops appear to have rejected the pope's authority, and sent him back a
      remonstrance against his rebukes. Lucius, however, recovered his see by the authority of the
      emperor Constantius, who was constrained to restore him by the threats of his brother
      Constans, then emperor of the West. This restoration is placed Tillemont before the council of
      Sardica, A. D. 347. When the death of Constans (<date when-custom="350">A. D. 350</date>) was known
      in the East, the Arian party, whom Lucius had provoked by the boldness and severity of his
      attacks, deposed him, bound him neck and hands with irons (as they had done at least once
      before), and in that condition banished him. He died in exile. The Romish church commemorates
      him as a martyr on the eleventh of February. (Athanas. <hi rend="ital">Apolog. de Fuga
       sua,</hi> 100.3, and <hi rend="ital">Hist. Arianor. ad Monach.</hi> 100.19; Socrat. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 2.15, 23, 26; Sozomen. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 3.8, 24, 4.2;
      Theodoret, <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 2.15; Tillemont, <hi rend="ital">Mémoires,</hi>
      vols. vi. and vii.; Bolland, <hi rend="ital">Acta Sanctorum Februarii,</hi> vol. ii. p. 519,
       <hi rend="ital">Epistolae Julii Papae et Orient. Episc.</hi> apud <hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. ii. col. 475, &amp;c. ed. Labbe.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>