<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lucifer_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lucifer_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="lucifer-bio-2" n="lucifer_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Lu'cifer</surname></persName></head><p>bishop of Cagliari, hence surnamed <hi rend="ital">Calaritanus,</hi> first appears in
      ecclesiastical history as joint legate with Eusebius of Vercelli [<hi rend="smallcaps">EUSEBIUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">VERCELLENSIS</hi>] from pope Liberius to the council of Milan (<date when-custom="354">A. D. 354</date>), where, along with his colleague, he displayed such determined
      firmness in withstanding the demands of the Arian emperor, that he was first cast into prison,
      and then transported from place to place as an exile. every where enduring hardships and
      cruelty.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Ad Constantium Augustum pro Sancto Athanasio Libri
        II.</title></head><p>While residing at Eleutheropolis in Syria Lucifer composed in vigorous but coarse and
        unpolished style his chief work, entitled <title xml:lang="la">Ad Constanetium Augustum pro
         Sancto Athanasio Libri II.,</title> which, although containing forcible arguments in favour
        of the truth, is characterised by such outrageous intemperance of expression, that many
        passages bear more resemblance to the ravings of a furious madman than to the calm reasoning
        which would become a Christian minister. Constantius, either in anger or contempt, inquired
        of Lucifer, through Florentius, the magister officiorum, whether he was really the author of
        this invective, but no immediate punishment appears to have followed the bold
        acknowledgment, and any scheme of vengeance which might have been meditated was frustrated
        by the death of the tyrant. The violent and ungovernable temper of the Sardinian prelate,
        who was now restored to freedom, along with other victims of religious persecution, soon
        began to introduce confusion and discord among his own friends. He increased the disorders
        which agitated the church at Antioch by interfering in their disputes, and ordaining
        Paulinus bishop, in opposition to Meletius; and when his proceedings were censured by
        Eusebius, who had been despatched to Antioch by the Alexandrian synod to quell these
        tumults, he did not hesitate to anathematise his old tried friend, so long the companion of
        his dangers and misfortunes. Finding that his extreme opinions received no sanction from the
        ecclesiastical authorities either in the East or West, and that he was disclaimed even by
        Athanasius, who at one time had spoken of his writings in terms of the warmest admiration,
        he retired to his native island, and there founded the small sect of the
         <title>Luciferiani.</title> The distinguishing tenet of these schismatics was, that no
        Arian bishop, and no bishop who had in any measure yielded to the Arians, even although he
        repented and confessed his errors, could enter the bosom of the church without forfeiting
        his ecclesiastical rank, and that all bishops and others who admitted the claims of such
        persons to a full restoration of their privileges became themselves tainted and outcasts --
        a doctrine which, had it been acknowledged at this period in its full extent, would have had
        the effect of excommunicating nearly the whole Christian world. Lucifer died during the
        reign of Valentinian, pro-bably about <date when-custom="370">A. D. 370</date>.</p></div><div><head>Other Works</head><p>The works of this fierce polemic, which, although all alike deformed by the same unseemly
        harshness and passion, are extremely valuable, on account of the numerous quotations from
        Scripture every where introduced, may be arranged in the following order: <listBibl><bibl>I. <hi rend="ital">Epistola ad Eusebium,</hi> written in the month of March or April,
          355.</bibl><bibl>II. <hi rend="ital">De non conveniendo cum Haereticis,</hi> written between 356 and
          358, at Germanica, while suffering under the persecution of Eudoxius, the Arian. bishop of
          that place.</bibl><bibl>III. <hi rend="ital">De Regibus Apostolicis,</hi> written at Eleutheropolis in
          358.</bibl><bibl>IV. <hi rend="ital">Ad Constantium Augustuum pro Sanclo Athanasio, Libri II.,</hi>
          written at the same place, about 360.</bibl><bibl>V. <hi rend="ital">De non parcendo in Deum delinquentibus,</hi> written about the
          same time with the preceding.</bibl><bibl>VI. <hi rend="ital">Moriendum pro Filio Dei,</hi> written about the beginning of 361,
          on being interrogated respecting the authorship of the tract <hi rend="ital">Ad
           Conestantium.</hi></bibl><bibl>VII. <hi rend="ital">Epistola ad Florentium Magistirum Officiorum,</hi> written at
          the same time with the preceding.</bibl><bibl>An <hi rend="ital">Epistola ad Catholicos,</hi> written while imprisoned at Milan, is
          lost.</bibl></listBibl></p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The Editio Princeps of the works of Lucifer appeared at Paris, 8vo. 1568,
        superintended by Joannes Tillius, bishop of Meaux (<hi rend="ital">Meldensis</hi>), and
        dedicated to pope Pius the Fifth. Although in many respects very imperfect</bibl>, <bibl>it
        was reprinted without alteration in the <title>Magna Bibliotheca Patrum,</title> fol. Colon.
        1618, vol. iv. p. 121</bibl>, and <bibl>also in the Paris collection</bibl>. But even these
       are superior to the text exhibited in the <bibl><title>Biblioth. Patrum Max.</title> fol.
        Lugdun. 1687, vol. iv. p. 181</bibl>, since here we find not only many changes introduced
       without MS. authority, but all the scriptural quotations accommodated to the vulgate version.
        <bibl>Much better than any of the preceding is the edition contained in the
         <title>Bibliotheca Patrum</title> of Galland, vol. vi. p. 115 (fol. Venet. 1770)</bibl>,
       but by far the best is that published by <bibl>the brothers Coleti (fol. Venet. 1778)</bibl>,
       whose labours presented this father for the first time in a satisfactory form.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Hieronym. <hi rend="ital">de Viris</hi> 3.95, <hi rend="ital">Advers. Luciferian.
        Dial.;</hi> Rufin. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 1.30; Sulp. Sever. <hi rend="ital">H. S.</hi>
       2.48; Socrat. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 3.5; Sozomen. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 5.12;
       Theodoret. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 3.4; Schönemann, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patr.
        Lat.</hi> 1.8, where very full information concerning the different editions will be
       found.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>