<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lucianus_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lucianus_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="lucianus-bio-2" n="lucianus_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Lucianus</surname></persName></head><p>2. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">BYZA</hi>, apparently the <hi rend="smallcaps">BIZYA</hi> of the
      classical writers, an episcopal city of Thrace, lived in the fifth century.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Letter to Leo I.</head><p>A Latin version of a letter of his to the emperor Leo I. Thrax (who reigned from <date when-custom="457">A. D. 457</date> to 474), is given in the various editions of the
         <title>Concilia.</title> It recognises the authority of the three councils of Nice, <date when-custom="325">A. D. 325</date>, Ephesus <date when-custom="431">A. D. 431</date>, and Chalcedon
         <date when-custom="451">A. D. 451</date>, and declares Timotheus (Aelurus) patriarch of
        Alexandria, to be deserving of deposition. From the reference to this last matter, on which
        Leo seems to have required the judgment of various prelates, the letter appears to have been
        written in or soon after <date when-custom="457">A. D. 457</date>. In the superscription to the
        letter he is called " Byzae Metropolitanus ;" but if we are correct in identifying Byza with
        Bizya, this title must not be understood as implying archiepiscopal rank, for Bizya does not
        appear to have been an archiepiscopal see, but a simple <pb n="812"/> bishoprick, under the
        metropolitan of Heracleia, of whom Lucian appeared as the representative in the council of
        Chalcedon. Lucian's name is subscribed to a decretal of Gennadius I., patriarch of
        Constantinople (<date when-custom="459">A. D. 459</date> to 471), as Lucian, " bishop of the
        Metropolitan see of Byza," <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπίοκοπος μητροπόλεως
         Βύζης</foreign>.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. iv. col. 908, ed. Labbe; vol. ii. col. 707, ed.
       Hardouin; vol. vii. col. 541, ed. Mansi; Le Quien, <hi rend="ital">Oriens Christianus,</hi>
       vol. i. col. 1146; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> ad ann. 457.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>