<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.licinia_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.licinia_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="licinia-bio-2" n="licinia_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Lici'nia</surname></persName></head><p>2. A vestal virgin, and the daughter of C. Licinius Crassus, tribune of the plebs, <date when-custom="-145">B. C. 145</date> [<hi rend="smallcaps">CRASSUS</hi>, No. 3]. She dedicated in
       <date when-custom="-123">B. C. 123</date> a chapel in a public place; but the college of pontiffs
      declared, when the matter was laid before them by order of the senate, that the dedication was
      invalid, as it had been made in a public place, without the command of the people: the chapel
      was therefore removed. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">pro Dom.</hi> 53.) The preceding Licinia appears
      to be the same vestal virgin who was accused of incest, together with two of her companions,
      in <date when-custom="-114">B. C. 114</date>. It appears that a Roman knight of the name of L.
      Veturius had seduced Aemilia, one of the vestals, and that, anxious to have companions in her
      guilt, she had <pb n="782"/> induced Marcia and Licinia to submit to the embraces of the
      friends of her seducer. Marcia confined her favours to her original lover; but Licinia and
      Aemilia had intercourse with numerous other persons; their guilt notwithstanding remained a
      secret for some time, till at length a slave, called Manius, who had assisted them in all
      their intrigues, disappointed in receiving neither his freedom nor the rewards which had been
      promised him, informed against them. All three were brought to trial; but as the college of
      pontiffs, of which the president at the time was L. Metellus, condemned (in December, see
      Macrob. <hi rend="ital">Saturn.</hi> 1.10) only Aemilia, but acquitted Licinia and Marcia, the
      subject was brought before the people by Sex. Peducaeus, the tribune of the plebs. The people
      adopted the unusual course of taking the matter out of the hands of the pontiffs, by
      appointing L. Cassius Longinus [<hi rend="smallcaps">LONGINUS</hi>, No. 4] to investigate the
      matter; and he condemned not only Licinia, who was defended by L. Crassus, the orator, and
      Marcia, but also many others. The severity with which he acted on this occasion was generally
      reprobated by public opinion. The orator M. Antonius was accused of being one of the paramours
      of these virgins, but was acquitted. [<hi rend="smallcaps">ANTONIUS</hi>, No. 8.]</p><p>Various measures were adopted to purify the state from the pollution which had been brought
      upon it by these crimes. A temple was built to the honour of Venus Verticordia, and four men
      were buried alive in the forum boarium, two Greeks and two Gauls, in accordance with the
      commands of the Sibylline books. This history of Licinia's crimes is of some importance, since
      it shows us that, even as early as this time, the Roman ladies of the higher orders had
      already begun to be infected with that licentious profligacy which was afterwards exhibited
      with such shamelessness by the Messallinas and Faustinas of the empire. (Dio Cass. <hi rend="ital">Fr.</hi> 92; <bibl n="Oros. 5.15">Oros. 5.15</bibl>; Plut. <hi rend="ital">Quaest. Rom.</hi> p. 284b.; Ascon. <hi rend="ital">ad Cic. Mil.</hi> 12, p. 46, ed. Orelli;
      Cic. <hi rend="ital">de Nat. Deor.</hi> 3.30, <hi rend="ital">Brut.</hi> 43; Obsequ. 97; <bibl n="Liv. Epit. 63">Liv. Epit. 63</bibl>.)</p><p>The vestal virgin Licinia, with whom the triumvir M. Crassus was accused of having had
      intercourse (<bibl n="Plut. Crass. 1">Plut. Crass. 1</bibl>), must have been a different
      person from the preceding, as M. Crassus was not born before <date when-custom="-114">B. C.
       114</date>. She may perhaps have been the same as the vestal virgin Licinia, the relation of
      L. Murena, who was of assistance to the latter in his canvass for the consulship, in <date when-custom="-63">B. C. 63</date>. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">pro Mur.</hi> 35.73.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>