<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lepidus_26</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.lepidus_26</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="lepidus-bio-26" n="lepidus_26"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Le'pidus</surname></persName></head><p>25. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">M'.</forename><surname full="yes">Aemilius</surname><addName full="yes">Lepidus</addName></persName>, Q. F., the son apparently of No. 21, was consul with
      T. Statilius Taurus in <date when-custom="11">A. D. 11</date>. (<bibl n="D. C. 56.25">D. C.
       56.25</bibl>.) He must be carefully distinguished from his contemporary M. Aemilius Lepidus,
      with whom he is frequently confounded. [See No. 23.] Though we cannot trace the descent of
      this M'. Lepidus [see No. 21], yet among his ancestors on the female side were L. Sulla and
      Cn. Pompey. (<bibl n="Tac. Ann. 3.22">Tac. Ann. 3.22</bibl>.) It is perhaps this M'. Lepidus
      who defended Piso in <date when-custom="20">A. D. 20</date>; and it was undoubtedly this Lepidus who
      defended his sister later in the same year. [<hi rend="smallcaps">LEPIDA</hi>, No. 2.] In
       <date when-custom="21">A. D. 21</date> he obtained the province of Asia, but Sex. Pompey declared
      in the senate that Lepidus ought to be deprived of it, because he was indolent, poor, and a
      disgrace to his ancestors, but the senate would not listen to Pompey, maintaining that Lepidus
      was of an easy rather than a slothful character, and that the manner in which he had lived on
      his small patrimony was to his honour rather than his disgrace. (<bibl n="Tac. Ann. 3.11">Tac.
       Ann. 3.11</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Ann. 3.22">22</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Ann. 3.32">32</bibl>.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>