<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.leontius_5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.leontius_5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="leontius-bio-5" n="leontius_5"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Leo'ntius</surname></persName></head><p>5. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">BYZANTIUM</hi> or <hi rend="smallcaps">CONSTANTINOPLE</hi>, an
      ecclesiastical writer of the latter part of the sixth and the commencement of the seventh
      century, sometimes designated, from his original profession, <hi rend="smallcaps">SCHOLASTICUS</hi>, i. e. the pleader. Several works of about the same period bear the name
      of Leontius, distinguished by the surnames of <hi rend="smallcaps">BYZANTINUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">PRESBYTER</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">CONSTANTINOPOLITANUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">CYPRIUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">HIEROSOLYMITANUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">MONACHUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">NEAPOLITANUS</hi>, and <hi rend="smallcaps">PRESBYTER</hi> et <hi rend="smallcaps">ABBAS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">ST.</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">SABAE</hi>; and as there is difficulty in determining how many
      individuals are designated by these various epithets, and which of the various works ascribed
      to them should be assigned to each, it will be desirable to compare the present article, which
      refers to the author of the work <hi rend="ital">De Sectis,</hi> with Nos. 20 and 26.</p><p>According to Cave, Leontius, having given up the exercise of his profession as a
      scholasticus, retired to the monastery which had been founded by St. Saba near Jerusalem, but
      was rejected by that saint for his adherence to the obnoxious tenets of Origen. But Cave is
      manifestly in error, and has confounded two different persons of the same name and place. The
      Leontius of Byzantium, who was excluded by St. Saba for Origenism, died in the reign of the
      emperor Justinian I. (Cyril. Scythopolit. <hi rend="ital">Vita S. Sabae,</hi> c. 86, apud
      Coteler. <hi rend="ital">Eccles. Graec. Monum.</hi> vol. iii. p. 366), but the work De <hi rend="ital">Sectis</hi> appears from internal evidence to have been written at least half a
      century after Justinian's death, and must therefore be the work of a later Leontius. Photius
      (cod. 231) and Nicephors Callisti (<hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 18.48) call the author of the
       <title>De Sectis</title> a monk, and do not notice his earlier profession. Galland (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Patrum,</hi> vol. xii. <hi rend="ital">Prolegom.</hi> c. 20) says that
      Leontius retired from the bar, and embraced a monastic life in Palestine; but we apprehend
      this is only a supposition, intended to account for the designation <hi rend="smallcaps">HIEROSOLYMITANUS</hi> in the title of some of the works, which he ascribes to this Leontius.
      Oudin, who is disposed to identify several of the Leontii, supposes that the exscholasticus
      became a monk and abbot of St. Saba (comp. No. 26), near Jerusalem. (<hi rend="ital">De
       Scriptorib. Eccles.</hi> vol. i. col. 1462, &amp;c.)</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The works which appear to be by this Leontius are as follows:--</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σχόλια</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Scholia</title></head><p>" taken down from the lips of Theodorus, the most godly abbot and wisest philosopher,
        accomplished alike in sacred and profane learning." This work, which is more commonly cited
        by the title <title>De Sectis,</title> consists of ten divisions called <foreign xml:lang="grc">πράχεις</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Actiones.</title></p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It was first published with a Latin version by Leunclavius, in a volume containing
          several other pieces, 8vo. Basel, 1578, and was reprinted in the <title>Auctarium
           Bibliothecae Patrum</title> of Ducaeus, vol. i. fol. Paris, 1624</bibl>; <bibl>in the
           <title>Bibliotheca Patrum,</title> vol. xi. fol. Paris, 1644</bibl>; <bibl>and in the
           <title>Bibliotheca Patrum</title> of Galland, vol. xii. p. 625, &amp;c., fol. Venice,
          1778.</bibl><bibl>The Latin version alone is given in several other editions of the <title>Bibliotheca
           Patrum.</title></bibl></p></div></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">Contra Eutychianos et Nestorianos Libri Tres.</title> s. <title xml:lang="la">Confutatio utriusque Fietionis inter se contrariae</title></head><p>Some speak of the three books into which this treatise is divided as distinct works.</p></div><div><head>3. <title xml:lang="la">Liber adversus eos qui proferunt nobis quaedam Apollinarii,
         falso inscripta nomine Sanctorum Patrum</title> s. <title xml:lang="la">Adversus Fraudes
         Apollinaristarum.</title></head><p/></div><div><head>4. <title xml:lang="la">Solutiones Argumentationum Severi.</title></head><p/></div><div><head>5. <title xml:lang="la">Dubitationes hypotheticae et definientes contra eos qui negant
         in Christo post Unionem duas veras Naturas.</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p>These pieces have not been printed in the original, but <bibl>Latin versions from the
          papers of Franciscus Turrianus were published by Canisius in his <title xml:lang="la">Lectiones Antiquae,</title> vol. iv. (or vol. i. p. 525, &amp;c. ed. Basnage), and were
          reprinted in the <title>Bibliotheca Patrum,</title> vol. ix. fol. Lyon, 1677, and in the
          above mentioned volume of the <title>Bibliotheca</title> of Galland.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>6. <title xml:lang="la">Apologia Concilii Chalcedonensis.</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>This was printed with a Latin version and notes, by Antonio Bongiovanni, in the
           <title>Concilia,</title> vol. vii. p. 799, ed. Mansi, fol. Florence, 1762, and was
          reprinted by Galland, <title xml:lang="la">l.c.</title></bibl> In the title Leontius is
         called Monachus Hierosolymitanus, but the word Hierosolymitanus is possibly an error of the
         transcriber. At any rate Galland identifies the writer with our Leontius; and the subject
         of the work makes it probable that he is right.</p></div></div><div><head>7. <title xml:lang="la">Adversus Eutychianos</title> (s. <title xml:lang="la">Severianos</title>) <title xml:lang="la">et Nestorianos, in octo libros
         distinctum.</title></head><p>This work is described by Canisius as being extant in MS. at Munich, and by Fabricius as
        occurring in the catalogue of the Palatine library.</p></div><div><head>8. <title xml:lang="la">Liber de Duplici Natura in Christo contra Haeresin
         Monophysitarum.</title></head><p>Labbe and Cave speak of this as extant in MS. at Vienna; and they add to it <title xml:lang="la">Disputatio contra Philosophum Arianum,</title> but this last piece seems to
        be an extract from Gelasius of Cyzicus [<hi rend="smallcaps">GELASIUS</hi>, No. 3], and is
        probably one of the discussions between <pb n="757"/> the " holy bishops " of the orthodox
        party and the" philosophers "who embraced the opposite side. If so, the Leontius who took
        part in it was not our Leontius, but a much older person, bishop of the Cappadocian
        Caesareia, contemporary of Athanasius, by whom he is mentioned, and author of several works
        not now extant.</p></div><div><head>9. Against the Tritheistic Heresy</head><p>According to Nicephorus Callisti (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), our Leontius wrote also " an
        admirable work" in thirty books, in which he entirely overthrew the tritheistic heresy of
        Joannes Philoponus, and firmly established the orthodox doctrine; but this work, if
        Nicephorus has correctly described it, is lost</p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Oratio in medium Pentecostem et in Caecum a Nativitate, necnon in
         illud: Nolite iudicare secundum faciem</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p>A homily, entitled <title xml:lang="la">Oratio in medium Pentecostem et in Caecum a
          Nativitate, necnon in illud: Nolite iudicare secundum faciem,</title> by " Leontius
         presbyter Constantinopolitanus," was published by Combéfis, with a Latin version, in
         his <title xml:lang="la">Auctarium Novum,</title> vol. i. fol. Paris, 1648. The editors of
         the <title>Bibliotheca Patrum</title> (vol. ix. fol. Lyon, 1677), by placing this piece
         among the works of our Leontius, appear to identify the writer with him; and Cave, though
         with hesitation, ascribes the homily to him. But it is not given by Galland; and Fabricius
          (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. viii. p. 321) ascribes the homily to Leontius of
         Neapolis. [No. 20.] </p></div></div><div><head>Other possible homlies</head><p>A homily on the parable of the good Samaritan, printed among the supposititious works of
        Chrysostom (<title xml:lang="la">Opera,</title> vol. vii. p. 506, ed. Savill), is ascribed
        by Allatius and Fabricius (<hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Graec.</hi> vol. viii. p. 326, vol. x.
        p. 304) to " Leontius of Jerusalem," who is perhaps the same as our Leontius. There are
        various homilies extant in MS. by "Leontius presbyter Constantinopolitanus."</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Photius and Niceph. Callisti, <hi rend="ital">ll. cc.;</hi> Canisius, <hi rend="ital">Vita
        Leontii,</hi> apud <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum,</hi> vol. ix. fol. Lyon, 1677, and <hi rend="ital">Lectiones Antiquae,</hi> vol. i. pp. 527, &amp;c., ed. Basnage; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> vol. i. p. 543; Vossius, <hi rend="ital">De Historicis
        Graecis,</hi> lib. 4. c. 18; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. viii. p. 309,
       &amp;c., 318, vol. xii. p. 648; Oudin, <hi rend="ital">de Scriptorib. et Scriptis
        Eccles.</hi> vol i. col. 1462; Mansi, <hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. vii. col. 797,
       &amp;c.; Galland. <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum,</hi> vol. xii. <hi rend="ital">Prolegom.</hi> c.20.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>