<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.learchus_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.learchus_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="learchus-bio-2" n="learchus_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Learchus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Λέαρχος</surname></persName>).</p><p>1. Of Rhegium, is one of those Daedalian artists who stand on the confines of the mythical
      and historical periods, and about whom we have extremely uncertain information.</p><p>One account made him a pupil of Daedalus, another of Dipoenus and Scyllis. (<bibl n="Paus. 3.17.6">Paus. 3.17.6</bibl>.) Pausanias saw, in the Brazen House at Sparta, a statue
      of Zeus by him, which was made of separate pieces of hammered bronze, fastened together with
      nails. Pausanias adds, that this was the most ancient of all existing statues in bronze. It
      evidently belonged to a period when the art of <term>casting</term> in bronze was not yet
      known. But this is inconsistent with the account which made Learchus the pupil of Dipoenus and
      Scyllis, for these artists are said to have been the inventors of sculpture in marble, an art
      which is generally admitted to have had a later origin than that of casting in bronze.
      Moreover, Rhoecus and Theodorus, the inventors of casting in bronze, are placed about the
      beginning of the Olympiads. Learchus must, therefore, have flourished still earlier; but the
      date of Dipoenus and Scyllis is, according to the only account we have of it, about 200 years
      later. [<hi rend="smallcaps">DIPOENUS.</hi>]</p><p>The difficulty is rather increased than diminished if we substitute for <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λέαρχον</foreign>, in the passage of Pausanias, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κλέαρχον</foreign>, which is probably the true reading. (See the editions of Schubart and
      Walz, and Bekker.) In another passage, Pausanias mentions (6.4.2) Clearchus of Rhegium as the
      instructor of Pythagoras of Rhegium, and the pupil of Eucheirus of Corinth. This Clearchus
      must therefore have lived about <date when-custom="-500">B. C. 500</date>, eighty years later than
      Dipoenus and Scyllis.</p><div><head>Confusion of two figures named Clearchus of Rhegium</head><p>We must therefore either assume the existence of two Clearchi of Rhegium, one near the
       beginning, and the other at the end of the Daedalian period, or else we must account for the
       statement of Pausanias by supposing that, as often happens, a vague tradition affixed the
       name of a well-known ancient artist to a work whose true origin was lost in remote
       antiquity.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>