<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.judex_t_vettius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.judex_t_vettius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="I"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="judex-t-vettius-bio-1" n="judex_t_vettius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Judex</addName>, <forename full="yes">T.</forename><surname full="yes">Ve'ttius</surname></persName></label></head><p>a name occurring on coins, a specimen of which is given below, but it is impossible to
      determine who this person is. Some modern writers have maintained that, in all those passages
      in which mention is made of the L. Vettius who gave information respecting the conspiracy of
      Catiline, with the surname <hi rend="ital">Index,</hi> that we ought to read <hi rend="ital">Judex :</hi> but this opinion hardly needs refutation, <pb n="638"/> as it is clear that he
      was called <hi rend="ital">Index</hi> from giving information (<hi rend="ital">indicium</hi>)
      respecting the conspiracy. (Comp. <bibl n="Cic. Att. 2.24">Cic. Att. 2.24</bibl>,-<hi rend="ital">Vettius ille, ille noster index.</hi>) It would appear, from the obverse of the
      coin, that this T. Vettius Judex had an agnomen Sabinus. (Eckhel, v. p. 336.)</p><p><figure/></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>