<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.joannes_31</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.joannes_31</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="I"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="joannes-bio-31" n="joannes_31"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Joannes</surname><addName full="yes">CAPPADOX</addName></persName></head><p>28. <hi rend="smallcaps">CAPPADOX</hi>, or the <hi rend="smallcaps">CAPPADOCIAN</hi> (2),
      patriarch of Constantinople, known by the surname <hi rend="smallcaps">NESTEUJTA</hi>
       (<foreign xml:lang="grc">νηστεύτης</foreign>), or <hi rend="smallcaps">JEJUNATOR</hi>, the
       <hi rend="smallcaps">FASTER.</hi> He is Joannes IV. in the list of the patriarchs of
      Constantinople. He was a deacon of the great church at Constantinople, and succeeded Eutychius
       [<hi rend="smallcaps">EUTYCHIUS</hi>] in the patriarchate A. D. 582, in the reign of the
      emperor Tiberius II. In a council held at Constantinople <date when-custom="589">A. D. 589</date>,
      for the examination of certain charges against Gregory, patriarch of Antioch [<hi rend="smallcaps">GREGORIUS</hi>, ecclesiastical and literary, No. 5; <hi rend="smallcaps">EVAGRIUS</hi>, No. 3], John assumed the title of universal patriarch (<foreign xml:lang="grc">οἰκουμενικὸς πατριάρχης</foreign>), or perhaps resumed it after it had
      fallen into disuse. [See above, No. 27.] Upon the intelligence of this reaching the pope,
      Pelagius II., he protested against it most loudly, and annulled the acts of the council as
      informal. A letter written in the most vehement manner by Pelagius to the Eastern bishops who
      had been present in the council, appears among his <title xml:lang="la">Epistolae</title> in
      the <title>Concilia</title> (Ep. viii. vol. v. col. 948, ed. Labbe, vol. ix. col. 900, ed.
      Mansi); but some doubt has been cast on its genuineness. Gregory I., or the Great, who (in
       <date when-custom="590">A. D. 590</date>) succeeded Pelagius, was equally earnest in his
      opposition, and wrote to the emperor Maurice and to the patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch,
      and to John himself, to protest against it. (Gregorius Papa, <hi rend="ital">Epistolae,</hi>
      lib. iv. ep. 32, 36, 38, 39, apud <hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. v. col. 1181, &amp;c.,
      ed. Labbe, vol. x. col. 1206, &amp;c., ed. Mansi.) John, however, retained the title probably
      till his death (about <date when-custom="596">A. D. 596</date>); and far from being odious to the
      Greek Christians, was and is reverenced by them as a saint.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>John of Cappadocia wrote:</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀκολουθία καὶ τάζις ἐπὶ ἐζομολογουμένων
         συνταγεῖσα</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Conse-quentia et Ordo erga eos qui peccata
         confitentur observanda</title></head><p>called by Cave <title xml:lang="la">Libellus Poenitentialis,</title> and by Allatius,
         <title xml:lang="la">Praxis Graecis praescripta in confessione peragenda.</title> This
        work, there is every reason to conclude, has been much interpolated: and Oudin (<hi rend="ital">De Scriptor. Eccles.</hi> vol. i. col. 1473, seq.) affirms is altogether the
        production of a later age.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>It is given by Morinus in the <title>Appendix</title> (pp. 77-90) to his work, <title xml:lang="la">Commentarius Historicus de Disciplina in Administratione Sacramenti
          Poenitentiae,</title> fol. Paris, 1651.<pb n="593"/></p></div></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λόγος πρὸς τὸν μέλλοντα ἐξαγορεῦσαι τὺν ἑαυτοῦ
         πνευματικὸν πατέρα</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Ad eos qui Peccatorum Confessionem
         Patri suo Spirituali edituri sunt Sermo</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>also given by Morinus (pp. 91-97)</bibl>. But Morinus himself doubts the
         genuineness of this work, and Oudin (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) denies it altogether.</p></div></div><div><head>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ μετανοίας καὶ ἐγκρατείας καὶ παρθενίας
         λόγος</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Sermo de Poenitentia, Continentia, et
         Virginitate.</title></head><p>This discourse is in some MSS. ascribed to Chrysostom.</p><div><head>Edition</head><p><bibl>It is printed in the editions of his works by Morell, vol. i. p. 809, and Savil,
          vol. vii. p. 641.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>4. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λόγος περὶ ψευδοποφητῶν καὶ ψευδοδιδασκάλων καὶ
         ἀθέων αἱρετικῶν, καὶ περὶ σημείων τῆς συντελείας τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου</foreign>,
         <title xml:lang="la">Sermo de Pseudoprophetis et falsis Doctoribus et impiis Haereticis, et
         de Signis Consummationis hujus Saeculi.</title></head><p>This discourse is ascribed in some MSS. to Chrysostom but is by Vossius, Petavius, Cave,
        and Assemani ascribed to John of Cappadocia.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It has been printed in some editions of his works (vol. vii. p. 221, ed. Savil,
          who, however, regards it as spurious</bibl>, <bibl>vol. viii. ed. Montfaucon, <hi rend="ital">in Spuriis,</hi> p. 72</bibl>, or <bibl>p. 701 in the reprint of Montfaucon's
          edition, Paris, 1836)</bibl>.</p></div></div><div><head>5. <title xml:lang="la">De Sacramento Baptismatis ad Leandrum
        Hispalensem.</title></head><p>This work, mentioned by Isidore of Seville (<title xml:lang="la">De Scriptoril.
         Eccles.</title> 100.26), is lost: it contained only a collection of passages from older
        writers on the subject of trine immersion.</p></div><div><head>6. <title xml:lang="la">Epistolarum ad diversos Liber.</title></head><p>This work, which is mentioned by Trithemius (<title xml:lang="la">De Ecclesiasticis
         Scriptoribus,</title> 100.224), is also lost.</p></div><div><head>7. <title xml:lang="la">Praecepta ad Monachum quendam</title></head><p>Extant in MS. in the Vatican Library at Rome, and in the King's Library at Paris.</p></div><div><head>8. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Παργγελίαι διάφοροι τοῖς Πιστοῖς</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Admonitiones Diversae ad Fideles.</title></head><p/></div><div><head>Other possible works</head><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Κανονάριον</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Canonarium</title></head><p>Beside the above writings, there is reason to think that John of Cappadocia is the author
         of a <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κανονάριον</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Canonarium,</title> describing the various depraved affections of the mind and the
         penance suitable to each, given by Morinus (ibid. pp. 101-117). The work is in some MSS.
         entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Ἰωάννου μοναχοῦ καὶ διακόνου</title>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">μαθήτου τοῦ μεγάλου Βασιλείου, οὗτινος ἡ ἐπωνυμία Τέκνον
          Ὑπακοῆς Κανονάριον</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Joannis Monachi et diaconi,
          discipuli magni Basilii, cui cognomentum est Obedieientiae Filius, Canonarium :</title>
         and some writers, as Morinus, Allatius, and Fabricius, distinguish this " Joannes,
         Discipulus Magni Basilii et Obedientiae Filius," from our John, but Assemani has shown that
         there is every reason to identify them.</p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Epistola ad Caesarium Monachum</title></head><p>Natalis Alexander (Saec. x. and xi. pars iii. p. 571, apud Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
          Gr.</hi> vol. i. p. 699, not. xx.) ascribes to John of Cappadocia the <title>Epistola ad
          Caesarium Monachum,</title> ascribed by others to Chrysostom, and celebrated for the
         testimony against transubstantiation contained in it : but his opinion appears to have been
         approved by few.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> vol. i. p. 541; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
        Gr.</hi> vol. xi. p. 108,&amp;c.; Morinus, <hi rend="ital">ll. cc. ;</hi> Assemani, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Juris Orientalis,</hi> vol. iii. pp. 479-542.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>