<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.ischomachus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.ischomachus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="I"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="ischomachus-bio-1" n="ischomachus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Ischo'machus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἰσχόμαχος</surname></persName>), an Athenian, whose
      fortune, according to Lysias, was supposed during his life to amount to more than seventy
      talents (above 17,000<hi rend="ital">l.</hi>), but on his death he was found to have left less
      than twenty, i. e. under 5,000<hi rend="ital">l.</hi> (Lys. <hi rend="ital">pro Arist.
       Bon.</hi> p. 156.) It appears, however, that he squandered his money on flatterers and
      parasites. (Heracl. Pont. apud <hi rend="ital">Athen.</hi> xii. p. 537c.) The union of
      meanness and prodigality is so common as to furnish no reason against supposing this
      Ischomachus to have been the same person whose stingy and grasping character we find attacked
      by Cratinus (apud <hi rend="ital">Athen.</hi> i. p. 8a.). We can, however, hardly identify him
      with the Ischomachus whom Xenophon introduces (<hi rend="ital">Oecon.</hi> 6, &amp;c.) as
      holding a most edifying conversation with his newly-married wife on the subject of domestic
      economy, of which he is represented as a bright example. Whether either of these was the
      Ischomachus whose daughter was married to the notorious <hi rend="smallcaps">CALLIAS</hi>, is
      again a doubtful point. (Andoc. <hi rend="ital">De Myst.</hi> p. 16.) The Ischomachus
      mentioned in the <title>Hymenaeus</title> of Araros (apud <hi rend="ital">Athen.</hi> p.
      237a.) was perhaps, says Meineke (<hi rend="ital">Fragm. Com. Graec.</hi> vol. ii. p. 176), a
      grandson of the man who is satirised by Cratinus. But the name was possibly used by Araros as
      the representative of a class, and in that case is no other than the mean feeder of parasites
      in the older poet. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.E">E.E</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>