<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.iollas_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.iollas_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="I"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="iollas-bio-1" n="iollas_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Iollas</surname></persName></head><p>or IOLAUS (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰόλας</foreign> or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰόλλας</foreign>), son of Antipater, and brother of Cassander, king of Macedonia. He was
      one of the royal youths who, according to the Macedonian custom, held offices about the king's
      person, and was cup-bearer to <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> at the
      period of his last illness. Those writers who adopt the idea of the king having been poisoned,
      represent Iollas as the person who actually administered the fatal draught, at the banquet
      given to <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> by Medius, who, according to
      this story, was an intimate friend of Iollas, and had been induced by him to take part in the
      plot. (Arrian, <bibl n="Arr. An. 7.27">Arr. Anab. 7.27</bibl>; <bibl n="Plut. Alex. 77">Plut.
       Alex. 77</bibl>; <bibl n="Curt. 10.10.14">Curt. 10.10.14</bibl>; <bibl n="Just. 12.14">Just.
       12.14</bibl>; <bibl n="Vitr. 8.3.16">Vitr. 8.3.16</bibl>.) It is unnecessary to point out the
      absurdity and inconsistency of this tale. (See Stahr's <hi rend="ital">Aristotelia</hi> vol.
      i. p. 136, &amp;c.; and Blakesley's <hi rend="ital">Life of Aristotle,</hi> p. 85, &amp;c.)
      Plutarch himself tells us expressly that it was never heard of until six years afterwards,
      when Olympias availed herself of this pretext as an excuse for the cruelties she exercised
      upon the friends and adherents of Antipater. Iollas was then dead, but she caused his grave to
      be opened, and desecrated with every mark of indignity. (<hi rend="ital">Plut. Alex.</hi> 77;
       <bibl n="Diod. 19.11">Diod. 19.11</bibl>.) The period or occasion of his death is nowhere
      mentioned : the last we hear of him is in <date when-custom="-322">B. C. 322</date>, when he
      accompanied his sister Nicaea to Asia, where she was married to Perdiccas. (Arrian, apud <hi rend="ital">Phot.</hi> p. 70a, ed. Bekk.) The story of Hyperides having proposed the voting a
      reward to Iollas as the murderer of <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> (
       <hi rend="ital">Vit. X. (Oratt.</hi> p. 849), which is in direct contradiction to the
      statement of Plutarch already cited, is unquestionably a mere invention of later times. (See
      Droysen, <hi rend="ital">Hellenism.</hi> vol. i. p. 705.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.H.B">E.H.B</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>