<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.innocentius_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.innocentius_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="I"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="innocentius-bio-2" n="innocentius_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Innoce'ntius</surname></persName></head><p>a Roman jurist, who lived in the reign of Constantine the Great, and under his sons
      Constantius and Constans. Although jurisprudence as a science was now upon the wane, jurists
      were privileged by the emperors as late as the reign of Constantius; and, by virtue of such
      privilege, their writings and opinions were invested with a kind of legislative force. The <hi rend="ital">jurist-made</hi> law of the Romans came into existence under the form of
      authoritative exposition or interpretation, and was more directly binding than what Bentham
      calls English <hi rend="ital">judge-made</hi> law. It was nearly analogous to a parliamentary
      declaration of the existing law, inasmuch as the jurist, in the exercise of his vocation, was
      made the representative of the emperor, the supreme power. Eunapius (<hi rend="ital">in Vit.
       Chrysanthii,</hi> p. 186, ed. Commelin) says that Innocentius was privileged as a jurist by
      the emperors under whom he lived. He is not mentioned in the Digest, which contains extracts
      from no jurist of later date than his.</p><p>In the collection of <hi rend="ital">Agrimensores,</hi> there is a treatsise, headed " Ex
      libro xii. Innocentii de literis et notis juris exponendis," or " Innocentius, V. P. auctor."
      The treatise does not profess to be the original work of a jurist, and is manifestly a
      compilation of much more recent date than the reign of Constantine : nor does it at all
      resemble the remains of legal stenography that we possess under the name of Valerius Probus
      and other writers of the same class. It relates to the <hi rend="ital">casae</hi> which were
      named after the letters of the alphabet, and the <hi rend="ital">case</hi> appears to have
      been <hi rend="ital">fundi,</hi> or portions of land; but the mode in which letters were
      connected with the fundi, so as to designate their qualities and peculiarities of position,
      has not been satisfactorily explained; and the treatise <hi rend="ital">De Casis
       Literarum</hi> is still perhaps the most enigmatical part of the writings on ancient
      land-surveying.</p><p>Rigaltius, in his first note on the treatise, " De Casis Literarum," says that an
      Innocentius, agrimensor, is mentioned in the 19th book of Ammianus Marcellinus, and quotes a
      passage, whence it would seem that, on some occasion, Innocentius gave instructions which
      enabled a party of troops sailing up a river to steer by observing certain <pb n="575"/> marks
      upon the banks. The reference is incorrect, and the passage cited by Rigaltius has not been
      found by subsequent inquirers. (<hi rend="ital">Auctores Rei Agrariae,</hi> ed. Goes. p. 167,
      n. p. 220-232.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.J.T.G">J.T.G</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>