, (occasionally Ἴναρος), son of Psammitichus, a chief of some of the Libyan tribes to the west
of Egypt, commenced hostilities against the Persians at the western extremity of the Delta,
and gradually succeeded in extending them to a general revolt, under his direction, of Egypt.
This, according to Diodorus (11.71), would be in B. C. 461. In 460 Inaros called in the Athenians, who, with a fleet of
200 gallies, were then off Cyprus : the ships sailed up to Memphis, and, occupying two parts
of the town, besieged the third. (Thuc. 1.104.) This was probably
preceded by a great battle, recorded by Ctesias and Diodorus (Diod.
11.74; Ctesias, 32), in which an immense host of Persians was defeated, and
Achacmenes, the brother of the king Artaxerxes, slain by the hand of Inaros. But a new army,
under a new commander, Megabyzus, was more successful. The Egyptians and their allies were
defeated; and Inaros, says Thucydides (1.110), was taken by
treachery, and crucified, B. C. 455. According to Ctesias he
retreated, when all Egypt fell from him, into the town of Byblus, and here capitulated with
the Greeks, on the promise that his life should be spared. Megabyzus thus carried him prisoner
to the court; and here the urgency of Amytis, the mother of the king, and Achaemenes, drove
Artaxerxes, after five years' interval, to break the engagement which he had confirmed to his
general. Inaros was put to a barbarous death, a combination, it sees, of impaling and flaying
alive (ἐπὶ τρισὶ σταυροῖς, Ctesias; comp. Plut. Art. 100.17). Megabyzus, in indignation, revolted.
Herodotus records the death of Achaemenes by the hand of Inaros, and speaks of having seen the
bones of those that fell with him in battle at Papremis. (Hdt. 7.7,
3.12.) He also tells us that though Inaros had done the Persians
more hurt than any man before him, his son Thamyras was allowed to succeed him in his
government, that is, we must suppose, of the Libyan tribes. (Hdt.
3.15.)