<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.himilco_6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.himilco_6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="H"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="himilco-bio-6" n="himilco_6"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Himilco</surname></persName></head><p>5. Commander of the Carthaginian forces at Lilybaeum during the first Punic war. At what
      time he was sent to Sicily does not appear, but we find him in command of Lilybaeum when the
      Romans, after the great victory of Metellus over Hasdrubal (<date when-custom="-250">B. C.
       250</date>), determined to form the siege of that important fortress. Himilco appears to have
      done all that an energetic and able officer could do: the forces under his command amounted to
      only 10,000 regular troops, while the Romans are said to have brought not less than 110,000
      men to the siege; but this must, of course, include all who took part in the works, not merely
      the fighting men. Both consuls (C. Atilius and L. Manlius) were with the Roman army, and they
      carried on their operations with the utmost vigour, endeavouring to block up the port by a
      great mole, <pb n="475"/> at the same time that they attacked the walls on the land side with
      battering rams and other engines. Himilco, on his side, though he had to contend with
      disaffection among the mercenaries under his own command, as well as with the enemy without
      the walls, was not less active; but he was unable to prevent the progress of the Roman works
      on the land: a great storm, however, swept away the mole that the Romans were constructing;
      and Hannibal, the son of Hamilcar, succeeded in running into the port with 50 ships and a
      force of 10,000 men, in the very teeth of the Roman fleet. Thus reinforced, Himilco renewed
      his attacks upon the works of the besiegers; and though repulsed in a first sally, he
      ultimately succeeded in burning all the battering engines and other works of the Romans. This
      decisive blow compelled the consuls to turn the siege into a blockade: nor were they able to
      make even this effectual, as they could not succeed in cutting off the besieged altogether
      from their communications by sea. The next year (<date when-custom="-249">B. C. 249</date>) the
      great victory of Adherbal at Drepanum rendered the Carthaginians once more masters of the sea;
      and Himilco is again mentioned as co-operating with Carthalo after that event, in the attempt
      to destroy the Roman squadron, which still kept guard before Lilybaeum. The enterprise was
      only partially successful; but from this time the communications of the city by sea appear to
      have been perfectly open. The name of Himilco occurs once more in the following year as
      opposing the operations of the consuls Caecilius and Fabius, but this is the last we hear of
      him; and we have no means of judging how long he continued to hold the command of Lilybaeum,
      or when he was succeeded by Gisco, whom we find in that situation at the conclusion of the
      war. (<bibl n="Plb. 1.41">Plb. 1.41</bibl>_<bibl n="Plb. 1.48">48</bibl>, <bibl n="Plb. 1.53">53</bibl>; Diod. <hi rend="ital">Exc. Hoeschel.</hi> 24.1; <bibl n="Zonar. 8.15">Zonar.
       8.15</bibl>, <bibl n="Zonar. 8.16">16</bibl>.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>