<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hilarius_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hilarius_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="H"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="hilarius-bio-4" n="hilarius_4"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Hila'rius</surname></persName> or <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Hila'rius</surname><addName full="yes">Arelatensis</addName></persName></head><p>surnamed <hi rend="smallcaps">ARELATENSIS</hi>, was born at the commencement of the fifth
      century, in Gallia Belgica, of a noble family, and distinguished himself in boyhood by the
      zeal and success with which he followed out the various branches of a liberal education. At an
      early age he became the disciple of Honoratus, first abbot of Lerins, by whom he was persuaded
      to abandon the world, and to devote himself to a monastic life. To this he attached himself so
      warmly, that when the bishopric of Arles became vacant in <date when-custom="429">A. D. 429</date>,
      by the death of his preceptor, he was with the utmost difficulty induced to yield to the
      wishes of the clergy and people, and to accept the episcopal chair. The circumstance that a
      monk of twentynine should have been chosen unanimously to till such an important station is in
      itself a strong proof of the reputation which he must have enjoyed as a man of learning,
      eloquence, and piety. His name, however, has acquired importance in ecclesiastical history
      chiefly from the controversy in which he became involved with Pope Leo the Great. A certain
      Chelidonius, bishop either of Vesoul or Besancon, had been deposed, in consequence of certain
      irregularities, by a council at which Hilarius presided, assisted by Eucherius of Lyons and
      Germanus of Auxerre. Chelidonius repaired to Rome for the purpose of lodging an appeal against
      this sentence, and thither he was followed by Hilarius, who expressed a wish to confer with
      the pontiff, but refused to acknowledge his jurisdiction in the case. Leo, incensed by what he
      considered as a direct attack upon his supremacy, forthwith reinstated Chelidonius, while
      Hilarius, entertaining apprehensions for his own personal freedom, was fain to quit the city
      by stealth, and make his way back to his diocese, on foot, crossing the Alps at the most
      inclement season of the year. He subsequently endeavoured, but in vain, to negotiate a
      reconciliation with Leo, who refused to listen to any ternis short of absolute submission, and
      eventually succeeded in depriving him of all the privileges which he enjoyed as metropolitan
      of Gaul. This proceeding was confirmed by the celebrated rescript of Valentinian III., issued
      in 445, in which, among other matters, it was ordained, <quote xml:lang="la">Ut Episcopis
       Gallicanis omnibusque pro lege esset, quidquid apostolicae sedis auctoritas sanxisset: ita ut
       quisquis Episcoporum ad judicium Romani antistitis evocatus venire neglexisset per
       moderatorem ejusdem provinciae adesse cogeretur,</quote> a decree which, while it
      unequivocally established the authority of the bishop of Rome over the church beyond the Alps,
      at the same time, when taken in connection with the circumstances by which it was called
      forth, seems to prove that up to this period such authority had never been fully and formally
      recognised. The merits of this dispute have, as might be expected, become a party question
      among ecclesiastical historians, who characterise the conduct of the chief personages
      concerned in the most opposite terms, according to the views which they entertain with regard
      to the rights of the papal chair. Hilarius died in 449, about five years after the deposition
      of Chelidonius.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The only works of this Hilarius now extant whose authenticity is unquestionable are--</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">Vita Sancti Honorati Arelatensis Episcopi,</title></head><p><title xml:lang="la">Vita Sancti Honorati Arelatensis Episcopi,</title> a sort of funeral
        panegyric upon his predecessor, which has been much admired, on account of the graceful and
        winning character of the style.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl><title xml:lang="la">Vita Sancti Honorati Arelatensis Episcopi</title> was first
          published at Paris by Genebrardus, in 1578</bibl>, <bibl>and a few years afterwards, from
          MSS. preserved at Lerins, by Vincentius Barralis, in his <title xml:lang="la">Chronologia
           sanct. insul. Lerin.</title> Lugd. 4to. 1613</bibl>; <bibl>the text of the former edition
          was followed by Surius ad xvi. Jan., and of the latter by the Bollandists, vol. ii. p.
          11.</bibl><bibl>It is also given in the <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Patr. Max.</hi> Lugd. 1677, vol. viii.
          p. 1228, in the <title>Opera Leonis I.,</title> edited by Quesnell, Paris, 4to.
          1675</bibl>, and <bibl>in the <title>Opera Vincentii Lirinensis et Hilarii
           Arelatensis,</title> by J. Salinas, Rom. 8vo. 1731.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">Epistola ad Eucherium Episcopum Lugdunensem</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>First published in the <title>Chronologia Lirinensis</title> of Barralis</bibl>,
         and <bibl>subsequently in the <title>Bibl. Max. Patr.</title> Lugd. vol. viii., in Quesnell
          and in Salinas. See above.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Other works</head><p>The author of his life, which we notice below, mentions also <hi rend="ital">Homiliae in
         totius anni Festivitates ; Symboli Expositio ;</hi> a great number of <hi rend="ital">Epistolae,</hi> and likewise <hi rend="ital">Versus,</hi> but all of these are lost,
        unless we agree with those who upon very slender evidence assign to this Hilarius three
        poems in dactylic hexamleters, of which two are ascribed in <pb n="470"/> different MSS. to
        different authors, and the third uniformly to Hilarius Pictaviensis. These are,</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">Poema de septem fratribus Maccabaeis ab Antiocho Epiphane
          interfectis</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Published under the name of Victorinus Afer, by Sicard, in his <title xml:lang="la">Antidot. cont. omn. Haeres.</title> 1528, inserted in most of the large
           collections of fathers</bibl>, and <bibl>in the <title>Sylloge Poetarum
            Christianorum,</title> Lugd. 1605.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">Carmen de Dei Providentia</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p>Frequently printed along with the works of Prosper Aquitanus.</p></div></div><div><head>3. <title xml:lang="la">Carmen in Genesim ad Leonem Papam</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>First printed by Miraeus in his edition of Hilarius Pictaviensis, Paris, fol.
           1544</bibl>; <bibl>published separately by Morellus, Paris, 4to. 1559</bibl>; <bibl>with
           a commentary by Weitzius, Franc. 8vo. 1625</bibl>; and included in all the larger
          collections of the fathers.</p></div></div></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Narratio de Miraculo</title></head><p>There is also a <title xml:lang="la">Narratio de Miraculo</title>, performed by a certain
        martyr named <hi rend="ital">Genesius,</hi> which is given to Hilarius in some MSS., but
        generally rejected as spurious.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>It will be found in Surius and the Bollandists under 25th August.</p></div></div></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Vita Hilarii</title></head><p>We have already alluded to an ancient <title xml:lang="la">Vita Hilarii</title>, which is
       commonly believed to be the production of Honoratus, bishop of Marseilles (about <date when-custom="460">A. D. 460</date>), but which in the Arles MS. is assigned to Reverentius, or
       Ravennius, the successor of Hilarius. It is contained in the <title>Chronologia
        Lirinensis,</title> and in Surius under V. Mai. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>