<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hegesias_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hegesias_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="H"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="hegesias-bio-3" n="hegesias_3"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Hege'sias</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἡγησίας</surname></persName>), a Cyrenaic
      philosopher, said by Diogenes Laertius (2.86, &amp;c.) to have been the disciple of
      Paraebates.</p><p>The date of Hegesias is unknown, though Ritter thinks that he was contemporaneous with
      Epicurus. He was the fellow-student of Anniceris, from whom, however, he differed by
      presenting in its most hateful form the system which Anniceris softened and improved. [<hi rend="smallcaps">ANNICERIS.</hi>] He followed Aristippus in considering pleasure the object
      of man's desire; but, being probably of a morose and discontented turn of mind, the view which
      he took of human life was of the gloomiest character, and his practical inferences from the
      Cyrenaic principles were destructive alike to goodness and happiness. The latter he said could
      not be the aim of man, because it is not attainable, and therefore concluded that the wise
      man's only object should be to free himself from inconvenience, thereby reducing the whole of
      human life to mere sensual pleasure. Since, too, every man is sufficient to himself, all
      external goods were rejected as not being true sources of pleasure, and therefore all the
      domestic and benevolent affections. Hence the sage ought to regard nothing but himself; action
      is quite indifferent; and if action, so also is life, which, therefore, is in no way more
      desirable than death. This statement (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὴν τε ζώην τε καὶ τὸν
       θάνατον αἱρετόν</foreign>) is, however, less strong than that of Cicero (<hi rend="ital">Tusc.</hi> 1.34).</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀποκαρτερῶν</foreign></head><p>Cicero also tells us (<hi rend="ital">Tusc.</hi> 1.34) that Hegesias wrote a book called
         <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀποκαρτερῶν</foreign>, in which a man who has resolved to
        starve himself is introduced as representing to his friends that death is actually more to
        be desired than life, and that the gloomy descriptions of human misery which this work
        contained were so overpowering, that they drove many persons to commit suicide, in
        consequence of which the author received the surname of Peisithanatos. This book was
        published at Alexandria, where he was, in consequence, forbidden to teach by king
        Ptolemy.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><hi rend="ital">Geschichte der Philosophie,</hi> 8.1, 3; see also <bibl n="V. Max. 8.9">V.
        Max. 8.9</bibl>.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.G.E.L.C">G.E.L.C</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>