<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hadrianus_p_aelius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hadrianus_p_aelius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="H"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="hadrianus-p-aelius-bio-1" n="hadrianus_p_aelius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Hadria'nus</addName>, <forename full="yes">P.</forename><surname full="yes">Ae'lius</surname></persName></label></head><p>the fourteenth in the series of Roman emperors, reigned from the 11th of August, <date when-custom="117">A. D. 117</date>, till the 10th of July, <date when-custom="138">A. D. 138</date>. He
      was born at Rome on the 24th of January, <date when-custom="76">A. D. 76</date>; and not as
      Eutropius (<bibl n="Eutrop. 8.6">8.6</bibl>) and Eusebius (<hi rend="ital">Chron.</hi> no.
      2155, p. 166, ed. Scaliger) state, at Italica. This mistake arose from the fact, that Hadrian
      was descended, according to his own account, from a family of Hadria in Picenum, which, in the
      time of P. Scipio, had settled at Italica in Spain. His father, Aelius Hadrianus Afer, was
      married to an aunt of the emperor Trajan; he had been praetor, and lived as a senator at Rome.
      Hadrian lost his father at the age of ten, and received his kinsman Ulpius Trajanus
      (afterwards the emperor Trajan) and Caelins Attianus as his guardians. He was from his
      earliest age very fond of the Greek language and literature, which he appears to have studied
      with zeal, while he neglected his mother tongue. At the age of fifteen he left Rome and went
      to Spain, where he entered upon his military career; but he was soon called back, and obtained
      the office of decemvir stlitibus; and about <date when-custom="95">A. D. 95</date> that of military
      tribune, in which capacity he served in Lower Moesia. When Trajan was adopted by Nerva, <date when-custom="97">A. D. 97</date>, Hadrian hastened from Moesia to Lower Germany, to be the first to
      congratulate Trajan; and in the year following he again travelled on foot from Upper to Lower
      Germany, to inform Trajan of the demise of Nerva ; and this he did with such rapidity, that he
      arrived even before the express messengers sent by Servianus, who was married to his sister
      Paulina. Trajan now became more and more attached to Hadrian, though the attachment did not
      continue undisturbed, until Trajan's wife, Plotina, who was fond of Hadrian, contrived to
      confirm the connexion by bringing about a marriage between her favourite and Julia Sabina, a
      grand-daughter of Trajan's sister Marciana. Henceforth Hadrian rose every day in the emperor's
      favour, for the preservation of which he did not always adopt the most honourable means. He
      was successively invested with various offices at Rome, such as the quaestorship in A. D. 101.
      In this capacity he delivered his first speech in the senate, but was laughed at on account of
      the rudeness and want of refinement in its delivery. This induced him to study more carefully
      his mother tongue and Latin oratory, which he had hitherto neglected. Soon after the
      expiration of his quaestorship he appears to have joined Trajan, who was then carrying on the
      war against the Dacians. In <date when-custom="105">A. D. 105</date> he obtained the tribuneship of
      the people, and two years later the praetorship. In <pb n="320"/> Trajan's second expedition
      against the Dacians, he entrusted to Hadrian the command of a legion, and took him with him.
      Hadrian distinguished himself so much by his bravery, that Trajan rewarded him with a diamond
      which he himself had received from Nerva, and which was looked upon as a token that Trajan
      designated him as his successor. In <date when-custom="108">A. D. 108</date> Hadrian was sent as
      legatus praetorius into Lower Pannonia; and he not only distinguished himself in the
      administration of the province, and by the strict discipline he maintained among the troops,
      but he also fought with great success against the Sarmatians. The favourable opinion which the
      emperor entertained of Hadrian on this account was increased through the influence of Plotina
      and Licinius Sura, a favourite friend of Trajan; and Hadrian was made consul suffectus for the
      year 109; nay, a report was even spread that Trajan entertained the thought of adopting
      Hadrian, and of thus securing to him the succession. After the death of Licinius Sura, Hadrian
      became the private secretary of Trajan; and the deference paid to him by the courtiers now
      increased in the same proportion as the intimacy between him and the emperor. Through the
      influence of Plotina, he obtained in <date when-custom="114">A. D. 114</date> the office of legate
      during the war against the Parthians; and in 117 he became consul designatus for the year
      following. It is said that at the same time he was promised to be adopted by the emperor; but
      Dio Cassius expressly denies it; and the further remark, that he was designated only consul
      suffectus, seems to show that lrajan, at least at that time, had not yet made up his mind as
      to his adoption.</p><p>While Trajan was carrying on the war against the Parthians, in which he was accompanied by
      Hadrian, and while he was besieging the town of Hatra, he was taken severely ill. He placed
      Hadrian at the head of the army and the province of Syria, and returned to Rome; but on his
      way thither he died, at Selinus, in Cilicia. Now it is said, that on the 9th of August, 117,
      Hadrian received intelligence of his adoption by Trajan, and on the 11th the news of his
      death; but this statement is contradicted by Dio Cassius, who renders it highly probable that
      Plotina and Attianus fabricated the adoption after the death of the emperor, and that for this
      purpose Trajan's death was for a few days kept secret. It is even said that Trajan intended to
      make Neratius Priscus his successor. Thus much, however, seems certain, that the fact of
      Trajan leaving Hadrian at the head of affairs in the east, when his illness compelled him to
      leave, was a sufficient proof that he placed the highest confidence in him. Hadrian was at the
      time at Antioch, and on the 11th of August, 117, he was proclaimed emperor. He immediately
      sent a letter to the senate at Rome, in which he apologised for not having been able to wait
      for its decision, and solicited its sanction, which was readily granted.</p><p>The Roman empire at this period was in a perilous condition: the Parthians, over whom Trajan
      had gained brilliant victories, had revolted, and been successful in several engagements; the
      provinces of Mauritania and Moesia were invaded by barbarians; and other provinces, such as
      Egypt, Syria, and Palestine, were in a state of insurrection. Hadrian, with a wise policy,
      endeavoured, above all things, to establish peace in the east. He purchased it with a great
      but necessary sacrifice: it was surely wise to give up what could not be maintained. He
      therefore renounced all the conquests which his predecessor had made east of the Euphrates; he
      restored Mesopotamia and Assyria to the Parthians, and recognised Cosrhoes, whom Trajan had
      deposed, as their king; while he indemnified Parthamaspater, whom Trajan had made king of the
      Parthians, by assigning to him a small neighbouring kingdom. Armenia, moreover, was raised to
      the rank of an independent kingdom. While engaged in making these arrangements, he is said to
      have been advised by Attianus to put to death Baebius Macer, praefect of the city, Laberius
      Maximus, and Frugi Crassus, either because they opposed his accession, or because they were
      otherwise hostile towards him; but it is added that Hadrian rejected this advice, though Frugi
      Crassus was afterwards killed, but without the emperor's command. Lusius Quietus, who at the
      time had the command in Mauritania, but was suspected of an attempt to place himself at the
      head of the Roman world, was deprived of his post, which was given to Marcius Turbo, who,
      under Trajan, had reduced the rebellious Jews, and was a personal friend of Hadrian.</p><p>After having settled thus the most urgent affairs of the empire, he went from Antioch to
      Cilicia, to see the body of Trajan, which was to be conveyed to Rome by Plotina, Attianus, and
      Matidia. Soon after his return to Antioch he appointed Catilius Severus governor of Syria, and
      travelled to Rome in <date when-custom="118">A. D. 118</date>. A triumph was celebrated to
      commemorate the victories of Trajan in the east, and the late emperor's image was placed in
      the triumphal car. The solemnity was scarcely over when Hadrian received the news that the
      Sarmatae and Roxolani had invaded the province of Moesia. He forthwith sent out his armies,
      and immediately after he himself followed them. The king of the Roxolani complained of the
      tribute, which he had to receive from the Romans, not being fully paid; but Hadrian concluded
      a peace with him, for which he had probably to pay a heavy sum. After this was settled, it
      appears that Hadrian intended marching into Dacia to attack the Sarmatians, when he was
      informed of a conspiracy against his life; it had been formed by the consular, Nigrinus, in
      conjunction with others of high rank, among whom are mentioned Palma, Celsus, and Lusius
      Quietus. Hadrian escaped from the hands of the conspirators, and all of them were put to
      death, as Hadrian himself said, by the command of the senate, and against his own will, though
      it was believed at the time, and is also maintained by Dio Cassius, that Hadrian himself had
      given orders for their execution. In consequence of this act of severity, popular feeling was
      very strong against him, especially as it was rumoured, that the conspiracy was a mere
      pretence, devised for the purpose of getting rid of those men who had been opposed to him
      during the reign of Trajan. As Hadrian had to fear the consequences of this state of public
      feeling, he entrusted the provinces of Pannonia and Dacia to Marcius Turbo, who had just
      pacified Mauritania, and returned to Rcme. His first object was to refute the opinion that he
      had any share in the execution of the four consulars, and he soothed the minds of the people
      by games, gladiatorial exhibitions, and large donations in money. Another act, which must have
      won for him the favour of thousands, both in Italy and the <pb n="321"/> provinces, was that
      he cancelled an enormous sum due to the state as taxes, viz. all the arrears of the last 15
      years, and to remove all fears from the minds of the people, he had the documents publicly
      burnt in the forum of Trajan. He further endeavoured to secure his government by winning the
      good will of the senate; he not only denied the charge brought against him respecting the four
      consulars, but swore that he would never punish a senator except with the sanction of the
      senate; and the senate was, in fact, made to believe that it had never been in the enjoyment
      of such extensive and unlimited powers as now. At the same time, however, he found it
      necessary to remove his former friends Attianus and Similis from their office of praefects of
      the praetorians, and to appoint Marcius Turbo and Septicius Clarus their successors.</p><p>The war against the Sarmatians was continued in the meantime by Hadrian's legates, and
      lasted for several years, if we may believe the chronicle of Eusebius, which mentions it as
      still going on in <date when-custom="120">A. D. 120</date>. In the year <date when-custom="119">A. D.
       119</date> Hadrian began his memorable journey through the provinces of his empire, many
      portions of which he traversed on foot. His desire to promote the good of the empire by
      convincing himself every where personally of the state of affairs, and by applying the
      necessary remedies wherever mismanagement was discovered, was unquestionably one of the
      motives that led him to this singular undertaking; but there can be little doubt that the
      restlessness of his mind and the extraordinary curiosity which stimulated him to go and see
      himself every thing of which he had heard or read, had as great a share in determining him
      thus to travel through his vast empire, as his desire to do good. These travels occupy the
      greater part of his reign; but the scanty accounts we have of them do not enable us to follow
      them step by step, or even to arrange them in a satisfactory chronological order. In <date when-custom="119">A. D. 119</date> he left Rome and first went to Gaul, where he displayed great
      liberality in satisfying the wants of the provincials. Front Gaul he proceeded to Germany,
      where he devoted most of his attention to the armies on the frontier. Although he was more
      desirous to maintain peace than to carry on war, he trained the soldiers always as though a
      great war had been near at hand; and the excellent condition of his troops, combined with the
      justice he displayed in his foreign policy, and the sums of money he paid to barbarian chiefs,
      were the principal means of keeping the enemies away from the Roman provinces. The <hi rend="ital">limes</hi> in Germany was fortified, and several towns and colonies were greatly
      benefited by him. From Germany he crossed over into Britain, where he introduced many
      improvements in the administration, and constructed the famous wall dividing the Roman
      province from and protecting it against the barbarous tribes of the north; it extended from
      the Solway to the month of the river Tyne, a distance of 80,000 feet, and traces of it are to
      be seen even at the present day. From Britain Hadrian returned to Gaul, and constructed a
      magnificent basilica at Nemausus (Nismes), in honour of his wife, Sabina, although during his
      absence in Britain, her conduct was such that he is reported to have said he would divorce her
      if he lived in a private station. After this he went to Spain, where he spent the winter,
      probably of A. D. 121 and 122, and held a convents of all the Romans residing in Spain. In the
      spring of 122 he crossed over to Africa, where he suppressed an insurrection in Mauritania,
      and then travelled through Egypt into Asia. A war with the Parthians was on the eve of
      breaking out, but Hadrian averted it by an interview which he had with their king. He next
      travelled through the provinces of Western Asia, probably during the early part of <date when-custom="123">A. D. 123</date>, visited the islands of the Aegean, and then went to Achaia,
      where he took up his residence at Athens. It would seem that he stayed there for three years,
      till <date when-custom="126">A. D. 126</date>. Athens was his favourite place, and was honoured by
      him above all the other cities of the empire: he gave to the people of Athens new laws, and
      showed his reverence for their institutions by being initiated in the Eleusinian mysteries, by
      acting the part of agonothetes at their public games, and by allowing himself to be made
      archon eponymus. From Athens he returned to Rome by way of Sicily, either in <hi rend="smallcaps"><hi rend="ital">A.</hi> D.</hi> 126 or 127. He was saluted at Rome as <hi rend="ital">pater patriae,</hi> and his wife distinguished by the title of Augusta. The next
      few years he remained at Rome, with only one interruption, during which lie visited Africa. He
      seems to have chiefly employed his time at Rome in endeavouring to introduce the Greek
      institutions and modes of worship, for which he had conceived a great admiration at Athens. It
      seems to have been about <date when-custom="129">A. D. 129</date> that Hadrian set out on his second
      journey to the east. He travelled by way of Athens, where he stayed for some time to see the
      completion of the numerous buildings which he had commenced during his previous visit,
      especially to dedicate the temple of the Olympian Zeus, and an altar to himself. In Asia he
      conciliated the various princes in the most amicable and liberal manner, so that those who did
      not accept his invitation had afterwards themselves most reason to regret it. He sent back to
      Cosrhoes a daughter who had been taken prisoner by Trajan; and the governors and procuratores
      in the provinces were punished severely wherever they were found unjust or wanting in the
      discharge of their duties. From Asia Minor he proceeded through Syria and Arabia into Egypt,
      where he restored the tomb of Pompey with great splendour. During an excursion on the Nile he
      lost his favourite, Antinous [<ref target="antinous-bio-3">ANTINOUS</ref>], for whom he
      entertained an unnatural affection, and whose death was to him the cause of deep and lasting
      grief. From Egypt, Hadrian returned, through Syria, to Rome, where he must have spent the
      latter part of the year <date when-custom="131">A. D. 131</date>, and the first of 132, for in the
      former year he built the temple of Venus and Roma, and i the latter he promulgated the <hi rend="ital">edictum perpetuum.</hi></p><p>Not long after his return to Rome the Jewish war broke out, the only one that disturbed the
      peace of his long reign. The causes of this war were the establishment of a colony under the
      name of Aelia Capitolina on the site of Jerusalem, and an order issued by Hadrian forbidding
      the Jews the rite of circumcision. The war was carried on by the Jews as a national struggle
      with the most desperate fury; it lasted for several years, and it was not till the general
      Julius Severus came over from Britain, that the Romans gradually succeeded in paralysing or
      annihilating the Jews; and the country was nearly reduced to a wilderness when peace was
      restored. The Jews were henceforth not allowed to reside at Jerusalem and its immediate
      vicinity; and from this time they <pb n="322"/> were dispersed through the world. After the
      close of the Jewish war another threatened to break out with the Albanians, who had been
      instigated by Pharasmanes, king of the Iberians. But the rich presents which Hadrian made to
      the Albanians and Iberians averted the outbreak, and Pharasmanes even paid a visit to Hadrian
      at Rome.</p><p>In the meantime, probably in the autumn of <date when-custom="132">A. D. 132</date>, Hadrian had
      again gone to Athens, where he stayed during the whole of the year following. From a letter of
      Hadrian, addressed to his brother-in-law, Servianus, and preserved by Vopiscus (<hi rend="ital">Suturnin.</hi> 8), we must infer that in 134 the emperor again visited Alexandria
      in Egypt, and, on his return through Syria, where he attended the sale of the Jews who had
      been made prisoners in the war, superintended the building of the colony at Jerusalem, and
      regulated its constitution. After his return to Rome, Hadrian spent the remainiig years of his
      life partly in the city and partly at Tibur, where he built or completed his magnificent
      villa, the ruins of which occupy even now a space equal to that of a considerable town. The
      many fatigues and hardships to which he had been exposed during his travels had impaired his
      health, and he sank into a dangerous illness, which led him to think of fixing upon a
      successor, as he had himself no children. After some hesitation, he adopted L. Ceionius
      Commodus, under the name of L. Aelius Verus, and raised him to the rank of Caesar, probably
      for no other reason than his beauty; for Ceionius Commodus had formerly been connected with
      Hadrian in the same manner that Antinous was afterwards connected with him. The adoption had
      been made contrary to the advice of all his friends, and those who had most strongly opposed
      it appeared to Hadrian in no other light than that of personal enemies. Servianus, who was
      then in his 90th year, and his grandson Fuscas, were the principal objects of his suspicions,
      and both were put to death by his command. Aelius Verus, however, who was entrusted with the
      administration of Pannonia, did not afford Hadrian the assistance and support he had expected,
      for he was a person of a weakly constitution, and died on the 1st of January, <date when-custom="138">A. D. 138</date>. Hadrian now adopted Arrius Antoninus, afterwards surnamed Pius,
      and presented him to the senators assembled around his bed as his successor. But Hadrian,
      mindful of the more distant future, made it the condition with Antoninus that he should at
      once adopt the son of Aelius Verus and M. Annius Verus (afterwards the emperor M. Aurelius).
      These arrangements, however, did not restore peace to Hadrian's mind : as his illness grew
      worse his suspicious and bitter feelings increased, and prompted him to many an act of
      cruelty; many persons of distinction were put to death, and many others would have been
      sacrificed in the same manner had they not been saved by the precautions of Antoninus Pius.
      The illness of which Hadrian suffered was of a consumptive nature, which was aggravated by
      dropsy; and when ne found that he could not be saved, he requested a slave to run him through
      with a sword; but this was prevented by Antoninus. Several more attempts were made at suicide,
      but in vain. At last he was conveyed to Baiae, where he hoped to find at least some relief,
      and Antoninus remained behind at Rome as his vicegerent. But his health did not improve; and
      soon after the arrival of Antoninus at Baiae, whom he had sent for, he died on the 10th of
      July, 138, at the age of 63, and after a reign of nearly twenty years. He was buried in the
      villa of Cicero, near Puteoli. The senate, indignant at the many acts of cruelty of which he
      had been guilty during the last period of his life, wanted to annul his enactments, and
      refused him the title of Divus, but Antoninus prevailed upon the senate to be lenient towards
      the deceased, who during the latter part of his life had not been in the full possession of
      his mind. A temple was then erected as a monument on his tomb, and various institutions were
      made to commemorate his memory. Antoninus is said by some to owe his surname of Pius to these
      exertions of filial love towards his adoptive father.</p><p>The above is a brief sketch of the events of the life and reign of Hadrian; and it now
      remains to offer a few observations on his policy, the principles of his government, his
      personal character, his influence upon art and literature, and his own literary productions,
      so far as they are known to us. The reign of Hadrian was one of peace, and may be regarded as
      one of the happiest periods in Roman history. His policy, in reference to foreign nations, was
      to preserve peace as much as possible, not to extend the boundaries of the empire, but to
      secure the old provinces, and promote their welfare, by a wise and just administration. For
      this reason he gave up the eastern conquests of Trajan, and would have given up Dacia also,
      had it not been for the numerous Roman citizens who had taken up their residence there. This
      general peace of the reign of Hadrian, however, was not the result of cowardice, or of
      jealousy of his predecessor, as some of the ancients asserted, but the fruit of a wise
      political system. Hadrian's presents and kindness to the barbarians would not have been
      sufficient to ward off their attacks, but the frontiers of the empire were guarded by armies
      which were in the most excellent condition, for the military system and discipline introduced
      by Hadrian were so well devised, that his regulations remained in force for a long time
      afterwards, and were regarded as law. With regard to the internal administration of the
      empire, Hadrian was the first emperor that understood his real position, and looked upon
      himself as the sovereign of the Roman world; for his attention was engaged no less by the
      provinces than by Rome and Italy, and thus it happened that the monarchical system became more
      consolidated under him than under any of his predecessors. He gained the favour of the people
      by his great liberality, and that of the senate by treating it with the utmost deference, so
      far as form was concerned, for, in reality, the senate was no more than the organ of the
      imperial will. An institution which gradually deprived the senate of its jurisdiction, and its
      share in the government, was that of the <hi rend="ital">consilium,</hi> or consistorium
      principis, which had indeed existed before, but received its stability and organisation from
      Hadrian. The political offices and those of the court were regulated by Hadrian in a manner
      which, with a few exceptions, remained unaltered till the time of the great Constantine. The
      praefectus praetorio henceforth was the president of the state-council (consilium principis),
      and always a jurisconsult, so that we may henceforth regard him as a kind of minister of
      justice. Hadrian himself paid particular attention to the proper exercise of jurisdiction in
      the provinces as well as in Italy: his reign forms an epoch in the history of Roman <pb n="323"/> jurisprudence. It was at Hadrian's command that the jurist Salvius Julianus drew up
      the <hi rend="ital">edictum perpetuum,</hi> which formed a fixed code of laws. Some of the
      laws promulgated by Hadrian are of a truly humane character, and aimed at improving the public
      morality of the time. He divided Italy into four regions, placing each under a consular, who
      had the administration of justice. The fact of his taking the titles of the highest
      magistracies in several towns in Italy and the provinces may indeed have been little more than
      a form, but it shows, at any rate, that he took a considerable interest in the internal
      affairs of those towns. The proceedings of those persons who were connected with the
      administration of provinces were watched with the strictest care, and any violation of justice
      was severely punished. While he thus on the one hand benefited the provinces by punishing and
      preventing oppression and injustice, he won the hearts of the provincials by his liberality
      during his travels. There is scarcely one of the places he visited which did not receive some
      mark of his favour or liberality; in many places he built aquaeducts, in others harbors or
      other public buildings, either for use or ornament; and the people received large donations of
      grain or money, or were honoured with distinctions and privileges. But what has rendered his
      name more illustrious than any thing else are the numerous and magnificent architectural works
      which he planned and commenced during his travels, especially at Athens, in the southwest of
      which he built an entirely new city, Adrianopolis. We cannot here enter into an account of the
      numerous buildings he erected, or of the towns which he built or restored: suffice it to
      direct attention to his villa at Tibur, which has been a real mine of treasures of art, and
      his mausoleum at Rome, which forms the groundwork of the present castle St. Angelo. His taste
      in architecture, however, appears to have been very capricious, and very different from the
      grandeur and simplicity of earlier times; in addition to this, he was tenacious of the plans
      he had once formed, and unable to bear any opposition or contradiction. The great architect,
      Apollodorus, had to pay with his life for the presumption with which he ventured to censure
      one of Hadrian's works; for the emperor's ambition was to be thought a great architect,
      painter, and musician.</p><p>Hadrian was not only a patron and practical lover of the arts, but poetry and learning also
      were nurtured and patronised by him. He was fond of the society of poets, scholars,
      rhetoricians, and philosophers, but, as in architecture, his taste was of an inferior kind.
      Thus he preferred Antimachus to Homer, and imitated the former in a poem entitled <title xml:lang="la">Catacriani.</title> The philosophers and sophists who enjoyed his friendship
      had, on the other hand, to suffer much from his petty jealousy and vanity, which led him to
      overrate his own powers and depreciate those of others. He founded at Rome a scientific
      institution under the name of Athenaeum, which continued to flourish for a long time after
      him. We possess few specimens of Hadrian's literary productions, although he was the author of
      many works both in prose and in verse. In his earlier years he had devoted himself with much
      zeal to the study of eloquence, but, in accordance with the prevailing taste of the age, he
      preferred the earlier Roman orators and poets to Cicero and his contemporaries. Some of
      Hadrian's own declamations were extant down to a very late period. He further wrote the
      history of his own life, from which some statements are quoted by his biographer Spartianus,
      and which was edited by his freedman Phlegon. The Latin Anthology (<hi rend="ital">Ep.</hi>
      206-211, ed. Meyer) contains six epigrams by Hadrian, and six others in Greek are preserved in
      the Greek Anthology, but none of them display any real poetical genius; they are cold and
      far-fetched.</p><p>Our sources of information respecting the life and reign of Hadrian are very poor and
      scanty, for the two main authorities, Hadrian's own work, and another by Marius Maximus, are
      lost, and, on the whole, we are confined to Spartianus's Life of Hadrian and the abridgement
      of the 69th book of Dio Cassius, by Xiphilinus. (Comp. Eutrop. viii, 3; Aurel. Vict. <hi rend="ital">de Caesar.</hi> 14; <bibl n="Zonar. 11.23">Zonar. 11.23</bibl>, &amp;c.;
      Tillemont, <hi rend="ital">Hist. des Emp.</hi> vol. ii. p. 219, &amp;c.; J. M. Flemmner, <hi rend="ital">de Itineribus et rebus gestis Hadriani secundum numorum et scriptorum
       Testimonia,</hi> Havniae, 1836; C. Ch. Woog, <hi rend="ital">de Eruditone Hadriani,</hi>
      Lipsiae, 1769; Meyer, <hi rend="ital">Fragm. Orat. Rom.</hi> p. 607, &amp;100.2nd edit.;
      Niebuhr, <hi rend="ital">Lect. on Rom. Hist.</hi> vol. ii. p. 265, &amp;c. ed. Schmitz.) </p><p><figure/></p><byline>[<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>