<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:G.gildo_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:G.gildo_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="G"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="gildo-bio-1" n="gildo_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Gildo</surname></persName></head><p>or GILDON (the first is the usual form in Latin writers, but Claudian, for metrical reasons,
      sometimes uses the second), a Moorish chieftain in the latter period of the Western Empire.
       <pb n="268"/> His father, Nubel, was a man of power and influence "velut regulus," among the
      Moorish provincials, and left several sons, legitimate and illegitimate, of whom Firmus,
      Zamma, Gildo, Mascezel (written also Mascizel and Mascezil, and, by Zosimus, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Μασκέλδηλος</foreign>), Dius, Salmaces, and Mazuca, and a daughter, Cyria,
      are mentioned by Amminus Marcellinus. Zamma, who was intimate with Count Romanus, was killed
      by Firmus; and the persecution which this murder provoked Romanus to institute drove Firmus
      into revolt (A. D. 372). The revolt, in which Firmus was supported by his sister Cyria and by
      all his brothers, except Gildo, was quelled by the Count Theodosius, father of the emperor
      Theodosius the Great. Mazuca was mortally wounded and taken in the course of the war, and
      Firmus destroyed himself. Gildo rendered good service to Theodosius in this war, and thus
      apparently paved the way for his future advancement.</p><p>He subsequently attained the offices of Comes Africae, and Magister utriusque militiae per
      Africam. If we can trust to an expression of Claudian, that Africa groaned under his
      government for twelve years, his appointment to these offices must date from about <date when-custom="386">A. D. 386</date>, in the reign of Valentinian II. How he acted when Africa was
      seized by the rebel Maximus, <date when-custom="387">A. D. 387</date> or 388, is not known; but from
      his continuing to hold the government of the province after the revolt of Maximus was quelled,
      itis probable that he continued faithful. The Codex Theodosianus (9. tit. 7. s. 9) shows that
      he possessed his high offices in <date when-custom="393">A. D. 393</date>. In the war of Theodosius
      against Arbogastes and Eugenius (A. D. 394), Gildo acted very ambiguously. It is probable that
      he professed allegiance to Theodosius, but did not send to him any contributions of ships,
      money, or men. Claudian intimates that Theodosius, irritated by this, proposed to attack him,
      but was prevented by death.</p><p>In <date when-custom="397">A. D. 397</date> Gildo was instigated by Eutropius the eunuch to
      transfer his allegiance and that of his province from the western to the eastern empire, and
      the emperor Arcadius accepted him as a subject. Stilicho, guardian of Honorius, was not
      disposed quietly to allow this transfer, and the matter was laid before the Roman senate,
      which proclaimed Gildo an enemy, and denounced war against him. Just about this time,
      Mascezel, brother of Gildo, either disapproving his revolt, or having had his life attempted
      by him, fled into Italy, leaving in Africa two sons, who were serving in the army there, and
      whom Gildo forthwith put to death. Mascezel, who had shown soldierly qualities in the revolt
      of Firmus, was placed by Stilicho at the head of the troops (apparently 5000 in number, though
      Zosimus speaks of "ample forces"), sent against Gildo (<date when-custom="398">A. D. 398</date>).
      Mascezel, who was a Christian, took with him several monks; and his prayers, fastings, and
      other religious exercises, were very constant. He landed in Africa, and marched to a place
      between Thebeste in Numidia and Metridera in Africa Proper, where he was met by Gildo, who,
      though not yet fully prepared for defence, had assembled an irregular army of 70,000 men,
      partly Roman troops who had revolted with him, partly a motley assembly of African tribes.
      Mascezel, whose enthusiasm was excited by a dream, in which St. Ambrose. lately deceased at
      Milan, appeared to him and promised him victory, easily routed the forces of his brother; and
      Gildo, who had managed to escape to the sea, was driven by contrary winds into the harbour of
      Tabraca, and being taken and imprisoned, put an end to his own life by hanging himself (<date when-custom="398">A. D. 398</date>).</p><p>If any confidence may be placed in the representations of Clandian, Gildo was a tyrant
      detestable alike for cruelty, lust, and avarice: the poet describes him as worn out with age
      at the time of his revolt. He was a Pagan, but his wife and his daughter Salvina (who had been
      married somewhere about <date when-custom="390">A. D. 390</date> to Nebridius, nephew of Flacilla
       [<hi rend="smallcaps">FLACILLA</hi>], first wife of the emperor Theodosius the Great, and had
      been left a widow with two children,) were ladies of approved piety, as was also Cyria, sister
      of Gildo, who had devoted herself to a life of perpetual virginity.</p><p>Mascezel did not long survive his brother. He was received by Stilicho on his return with
      apparent honour and real jealousy, and while crossing a bridge, apparently at Milan, among the
      retinue of Stilicho, was, by his order, shoved, as if accidentally, into the river, carried
      away by the stream, and drowned. Orosius regards his death as a divine judgment for his having
      been puffed up with pride at his victory, and having forsaken the society of the monks and
      religious persons with whom he before kept company, and especially for having dragged some
      accused persons out of a church, where they had taken sanctuary. This change of demeanour
      excites a suspicion that his former exercises of piety were a feint to excite the enthusiasm
      of his own army, or act upon the superstitious fears of his opponents. (<bibl n="Amm. 29.5">Amm. Marc. 29.5</bibl>; <bibl n="Oros. 7.36">Oros. 7.36</bibl>; Zosim. 5.11; Marcellin. <hi rend="ital">Chron.;</hi> Claudian, <hi rend="ital">de Bell. Gildon.,</hi> and <hi rend="ital">de Laudibus Stilichonis,</hi> lib. i.; Hieronymus, <hi rend="ital">Epist.</hi> lxxxv., <hi rend="ital">ad Salvinam</hi> vol. iv. co.. 663, ed. Benedict; Tillemont, <hi rend="ital">Hist. des Emp.</hi> vol. v.; Gibbon, 100.29.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.J.C.M">J.C.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>