<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:G.geminus_tanusius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:G.geminus_tanusius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="G"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="geminus-tanusius-bio-1" n="geminus_tanusius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Ge'minus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Tanu'sius</surname></persName></label></head><p>a Roman historian who seems to have lived about the time of Cicero. The exact nature of his
      work is uncertain, although we know that in it he spoke of the time of Sulla. (<bibl n="Suet. Jul. 9">Suet. Jul. 9</bibl>.) Plutarch (<bibl n="Plut. Caes. 22">Plut. Caes.
       22</bibl>) mentions an historian whom he calls <foreign xml:lang="grc">Γανύσιος</foreign>, and whom Vossius (<hi rend="ital">de Hist. Lat.</hi> 1.12) considers to
      be the same as our Tanusius. Seneca (<hi rend="ital">Epist.</hi> 93) speaks of one Tamusius as
      the author of annals; and it is not improbable that this is merely a slight mistake in the
      name, for Tanusius; and if this be so, Tanusius Geminus wrote annals of his own time, which
      are lost with the exception of a fragment quoted by Suetonins. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>