<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:G.geminus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:G.geminus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="G"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="geminus-bio-1" n="geminus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1383"><surname full="yes">Gemi'nus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Γεμῖνος</surname></persName>). This name comes down
      to us in the manuscripts of Proclus, with a circumflex on the penultimate syllable. Gerard
      Vossius believes, nevertheless, that it is the Latin word : Petavius and Fabricius admit the
      circumflex without other comment than reference to Proclus. Any one is justified in saying
      either Geminus or Geminus, according to his theory.</p><p>Of the man belonging to this dubious name we know nothing but that, from a passage in his
      works relative to the Egyptian <hi rend="ital">annus vagus</hi> of 120 years before his own
      time, it appears that he must have been living in the year <date when-custom="-77">B. C. 77</date>.
      He was a Rhodian, and both Petavius and Vossius suspect that he wrote at Rome; but perhaps on
      no stronger foundation than his Latin name and his Greek tongue, which make them suppose that
      he was a <hi rend="ital">libertus.</hi> Proclus mentions him (p. 11 of Grynoeus) as
      distinguishing the mathematical sciences into <foreign xml:lang="grc">νοητά</foreign> and
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">αἴδθητα</foreign>, in the former of which he places geometry and
      arithmetic, in the latter mechanics, astronomy, optics, geodesy, canonics, and <hi rend="ital">logic</hi> (no doubt a corruption of <hi rend="ital">loyistics,</hi> or computation;
      Barocius has <hi rend="ital">ars supputatrix</hi>). Again (p. 31)</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Proclus mentions him as author of a geometrical work containing an account of spiral,
       conchoid, and cissoid lines. But Delambre (<hi rend="ital">Astr. Anc.</hi> vol. i. p. 211)
       saw reason to question the skill of Geminus both in arithmetic and geometry.</p><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰσαγωγὴ εἰς τὰ Φαινόμενα</foreign></head><p>The only work of Geminus now remaining is the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰσαγωγὴ εἰς
         τὰ Φαινόμενα</foreign>, which many wrongly make to be a commentary on the
         <title>Phaenomena</title> of Aratus. The work on the sphere attributed to Proclus is not
        much more than an abridgment of some chapters of Geminus. The book of the latter is a
        descriptive treatise on elementary astronomy, with a great deal of historical allusion.
        There is a full account of it in Delambre (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>). The total rejection
        of the supposed effects of the risings and settings of the stars, &amp;c. upon the weather
        is creditable to Geminus.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The work was first published by Edo Hildericus, Gr. Lat., Altorf, 1590, 8vo.</bibl><bibl>This edition was reprinted at Leyden, 1603, 8vo.</bibl><bibl>H. Briggs diligently compared the edition with a manuscript at Oxford, and handed the
          results to Petavius, who made a similar comparison with another manuscript of his own, and
          published a corrected edition (Gr. Lat.) in his <title xml:lang="la">Uranologion,</title>
          Paris, 1630. fol.</bibl></p><p><bibl>The most recent edition is that in Halma's edition of Ptolemy, Paris, 1819,
          4to.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Other work</head><p>Petavius also informs us that another work of Geminus was sent to England in manuscript,
        with other portions of the library of Barocius (the editor of Proclus, we presume).</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Proclus; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iv. p. 31, &amp;c.; Petavius, <hi rend="ital">Uranologion ;</hi> Weidler, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Astron. ;</hi> Delambre, <hi rend="ital">Astron. Anc.</hi></p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.A.DE.M">A. De M.</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>