<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fuscus_arellius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fuscus_arellius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="F"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="fuscus-arellius-bio-1" n="fuscus_arellius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Fuscus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Are'llius</surname></persName></label></head><p>a rhetorician who flourished at Rome in the latter years of Augustus. He was of equestrian
      rank, but was degraded from it on account of some remarkable scandal attached to his life.
       (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 33.12.152">Plin. Nat. 33.12.152</bibl>.) He instructed in rhetoric the
      poet Ovid (Senec. <hi rend="ital">Controv.</hi> x. p. 157 Bip.), the philosopher Fabianus (Id.
       <hi rend="ital">Controv.</hi> proem. ii.), and others. He declaimed more frequently in Greek
      than in Latin (<hi rend="ital">Suasor.</hi> iv. p. 29), and his style of declamation is
      described by Seneca (<hi rend="ital">Controv.</hi> proem. ii. p. 134), as more brilliant than
      solid, antithetical rather than eloquent. Seneca, however, highly commends his statement (<hi rend="ital">explicatio</hi>) of an argument. (<hi rend="ital">Suasor.</hi> iv.) His eulogy of
      Cicero (<hi rend="ital">Suasor.</hi> vii. p. 50) is the most interesting specimen of his
      manner. The Suasoriae and Controversiae both abound in citations from the rhetorical exercises
      of Fuscus. His rival in teaching and declaiming was Porcius Latro [<hi rend="smallcaps">LATRO</hi>], and their styles seem to have been exact opposites. (Comp. <hi rend="ital">Controv.</hi> ii. proem. and x. p. 157.) Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 33.12.152">Plin. Nat.
       33.12.152</bibl>) reproaches Fuscus with wearing silver rings. There were two rhetoricians of
      this name, a father and son, since Seneca generally affixes "pater" to his mention of Arellius
      Fuscus. The praenomen of one of them was Quintus. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.B.D">W.B.D</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>