<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.favorinus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.favorinus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="F"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="favorinus-bio-1" n="favorinus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Favori'nus</surname></persName></head><p>a Latin orator, of whom nothing is known, except that Gellius (<bibl n="Gel. 15.8">15.8</bibl>) has preserved a fragment of one of his orations in support of a <hi rend="ital">lex Licinia de sumtu minuendo.</hi> The question as to who this Favorinus, and what this
      Licinian law was, deserves some attention. A Roman orator of the name of Favorinus is
      altogether unknown, and hence critics have proposed to change the name in Gellius into
      Fannius, Augurinus, or Favonius; but as all the MSS. agree in Favorinus, it would be arbitrary
      to make any such alteration, and we must acquiesce in what we learn from Gellius. As for the
      lex Licinia here spoken of, Macrobius (2.13), in enumerating the sumptuary laws, mentions one
      which was carried by P. Licinius Crassus Dives, and which is, in all probability, the one
      which was supported by Favorinus. The exact year in which this law was promulgated is
      uncertain; some assign it to the censorship of Licinius Crassus, <date when-custom="-89">B. C.
       89</date>, others to his consulship in <date when-custom="-97">B. C. 97</date>, and others, again,
      to his tribuneship, <date when-custom="-110">B. C. 110</date>, or his praetorship, <date when-custom="-104">B. C. 104</date>. The poet Lucilius is known to have mentioned this law in his
      Satires; and as that poet died in <date when-custom="-103">B. C. 103</date>, it is at any rate clear
      that the law must have been carried previous to the consulship of Licinins Crassus, <hi rend="ital">i. e.</hi> previous to <date when-custom="-97">B. C. 97</date>. (H. Meyer, <hi rend="ital">Fragm. Orat. Rom.</hi> p. 207, &amp;c., 2d edit.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>