<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fausta_flavia_maximiana_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fausta_flavia_maximiana_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="F"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="fausta-flavia-maximiana-bio-1" n="fausta_flavia_maximiana_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Fausta</addName>, <forename full="yes">Fla'via</forename><surname full="yes">Maximia'na</surname></persName></label></head><p>the daughter of Maximianus IHerculius and Eutropia, was married in <date when-custom="307">A. D.
       307</date> to Constantine the Great, to whom she bore Constantinus, Constantius, and
      Constans. She acquired great influence with her husband in consequence of having saved his
      life by revealing the treacherous schemes of her father, who, driven to despair by his
      failure, soon after died at Tarsus. But although, on this occasion at least, she appeared in
      the light of a devoted wife, she at the same time played the part of a most cruel stepmother,
      for, in consequence of her jealous machinations, Constantine was induced to put his son
      Crispus to death. When, however, the truth was brought to light by Helena, who grieved deeply
      for her grandchild, Fausta was shut up in a bath heated far above the common temperature, and
      was thus suffocated, probably in <date when-custom="326">A. D. 326</date>. Zosimus seems inclined to
      throw the whole blame in both instances on Constantine, whom he accuses as the hypocritical
      perpetrator of a double murder, while others assign the promiscuous profligacy of the empress
      as the true origin of her destruction, but in reality the time, the causes, and the manner of
      her death are involved in great obscurity in consequence of the vague and contradictory
      representations of our historical authorities. (<hi rend="smallcaps">CONSTANTINUS</hi>, p.
      835; <hi rend="smallcaps">CRISPUS</hi>, p. 892; Zosim. 2.10, 29; Julian, <hi rend="ital">Orat.</hi> i; Auctor, <hi rend="ital">de Mort. persec.</hi> 27; <bibl n="Eutrop. 10.2">Eutrop. 10.2</bibl>, <bibl n="Eutrop. 10.4">4</bibl>; Victor. <hi rend="ital">Epit.</hi> 40,
      41; Philostorg. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 2.4; Tillemont, <hi rend="ital">Histoire des
       Empereurs,</hi> vol. iv. art. lxii. p. 224, and <hi rend="ital">Notes sur Constantin,</hi>
      xvii; Eckhel, vol. viii. p. 98.) </p><p><figure/></p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>