<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.falto_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.falto_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="F"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="falto-bio-2" n="falto_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Falto</surname></persName></head><p>1. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Q.</forename><surname full="yes">Valerius</surname><addName full="yes">Falto</addName></persName>, Q. F. P. N., was the first Praetor Perogrinus at Rome
       (<hi rend="ital">Dict. of Ant. s. v. Praetor.</hi>) The occasion for a second praetorship
      was, that the war with Carthage required two commanders, and A. Postumius Albinus, one of the
      consuls for the year <date when-custom="-242">B. C. 242</date>, being at the time priest of Mars,
      was forbidden by the Pontifex Maximus to leave the city. Falto was second in command of the
      fleet which, in that year, the last of the first Punic war, the Romans dispatched under C.
      Lutatius Catulus [<hi rend="smallcaps">CATULUS</hi>] against the Carthaginians in Sicily.
      After Catulus had been disabled by a wound at the siege of Drepanum, the active duties of the
      campaign devolved on Falto. His conduct at the battle of the Aegates so mulch contributed to
      the victory of the Romans that, on the return of the fleet, Falto demanded to share the
      triumph of Catulus. His claim was rejected, on the ground that an inferior officer had no
      title to the recompense of the chief in command. The dispute was referred to arbitration; and
      the arbiter, Atilius Calatinus, decided against Falto, alleging that, as in the field the
      consul's orders took precedence of the praetor's, and as the praetor's auspices, in case of
      dispute, were always held inferior to the consul's, so the triumph was exclusively a consular
      distinction. The people, however, thought that Falto merited the honour, and lie accordingly
      triumphed on the 6th of October, <date when-custom="-241">B. C. 241</date>. Falto was consul in
       <date when-custom="-239">B. C. 239</date>. (Liv. <hi rend="ital">Epit.</hi> xix.; Fast. Capit.;
       <bibl n="V. Max. 1.1.2">V. Max. 1.1.2</bibl>, <bibl n="V. Max. 2.8.2">2.8.2</bibl>.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>