Facundusstyled " Episcopus Hermianensis," from the see which he held in the province of Byzacium, in
Africa Propria, lived about the middle of the sixth century. When Justinian (A. D. 544) published an edict condemning, 1st, the Epistle of Ibas, bishop of Edessa;
2d, the doctrine of Theodore, bishop of Mopsuestia; and 3d, certain writings of Theodoret,
bishop of Cyrus or Cyrrus; and anathematising all who approved of them, his edict was resisted
by many, as impugning the judgment of the general council of Chalcedon (held A. D. 451), at which the prelates whose sentiments or writings were obnoxious were
not only not condemned, but two of them, Ibas and Theodore, restored to their sees, from which
they had been expelled. Facundus was one of those who rejected the Emperor's edict; and was
requested by his brethren (apparently the other bishops of Africa) to prepare a defence of the
Council on the three points (currently termed by ecclesiastical writers the " tria capitula ")
on which its judgment was impugned. He was at Constantinople, engaged in this
work, when the pope, Vigilius (A. D. 547), arrived, and directed him
and all the other bishops who were there, about seventy in number, to give their opinion on
the "tria capitula" in writing in seven days. The answer of Facundus consisted of extracts
from his unfinished work; but as, from the haste and excitement under which it was prepared,
and the inaccuracy of some of its quotations, it did not satisfy its author, he afterwards
finished and published his larger work, as being a more moderate and better arranged defence
of the council. Vigilius having been induced to approve of the condemnation of Ibas, Theodore,
and Theodoret, though with a reservation of the authority of the council of Chalcedon,
Facundus, with the bishops of Africa and of some other provinces, refused to have communion
with him and with those who joined in the condemnation; and being persecuted for this, he was
obliged to conceal himself. During this concealment, at the request of some persons whom he
does not name, he wrote his reply to Mocian, a scholasticus or pleader, who had written
against the decision of the council of Chalcedon. Nothing further is known of Facundus.
Works
Pro Defensione Trium Capitulorum Libri XII., and
Contra Mocianum LiberEditions
Two of his writings, viz.
Pro Defensione Trium Capitulorum Libri
XII., and
Contra Mocianum Liber, were published with
notes by
Sirmond (8vo. Paris. 1629).
These works, with Sirmond's notes, are reprinted in the edition of the works of
Optatus, by Philippus Priorius, and
in the Bibliotheca Patrum,
vol. x. ed. Lyon, A. D. 1677, and
vol. xi. ed. Venice, by Gallandius, A. D. 1765. Epistola Fidei Catholicae in Defensione Trium
CapitulorumEditions
Another work of Facundus, entitled
Epistola Fidei Catholicae in
Defensione Trium Capitulorum, was
first published in the
Spicilegium of D'Achery (vol. iii. p. 106 of the first edition, or vol.
iii. p. 307. ed. of 1723), chiefly with the view of showing that Facundus continued
out of communion with the Pope and the Catholic Church, and so of weakening his authority:
for the Protestants had cited a passage from his
Defensio Trium
Capitulorum against the doctrine of the Real Presence. This letter is reprinted in
the
Bibliotheca Patrum of Gallandius.
De duabus Naturis Domini Christi.Cassiodorus (
Expos. in Psalm cxxxviii. sub fin.) speaks of
two books of Facundus
De duabus Naturis Domini Christi. By some
scholars he is thought to mean the two first books of the
Defensio ; but
Fabricius thinks that he speaks of a separate work of Facundus now lost.
Further Information
Facundus, works as above; Victor Tunnunensis, Chronicon ; Isidor.
Hisp. De Scrip. Eccles. 100.19.; Baronius, Annal. ad
Ann. 546, 547, and Pagius, Critic. in Baron.; Cave, Hist. Lit. vol. :. p. 520; Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol.
x. p. 543, and Bibl. Med. et Inf. Latin. vol. ii. p. 140, Padua, 1754;
Galland. Biblioth. Patrum, vol. xi., Proleg,.
100.13.
[J.C.M](author.J.C.M)]