<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fabricia_gens_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fabricia_gens_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="F"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="fabricia-gens-bio-1" n="fabricia_gens_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Fabri'cia</surname><addName full="yes">Gens</addName></persName></label></head><p>seems to have belonged originally to the Hernican town of Aletrium, where Fabricii occur as
      late as the time of Cicero (<bibl n="Cic. Clu. 16">Cic. Clu. 16</bibl>, &amp;c.) The first
      Fabricius who occurs in history is the celebrated C. Fabricius Luscinus, who distinguished
      himself in the war against Pyrrhus, and who was probably the first of the Fabricii who quitted
      his native place and settled at Rome. We know that in <date when-custom="-306">B. C. 306</date>,
      shortly before the war with Pyrrhus, most of the Hernican towns revolted against Rome, but
      were subdued and compelled to accept the Roman franchise without the suffrage : three towns,
      Aletrium, Ferentinum, and Verulae, which had remained faithful to Rome, were allowed to retain
      their former constitution; that is, they remained to Rome in the relation of isopolity. (<bibl n="Liv. 9.42">Liv. 9.42</bibl>, &amp;c.) Now it is very probable that C. Fabricius Luscinus
      either at that time or soon after left Aletrium and settled at Rome, where, like other
      settlers from isopolite towns, he soon rose to high honours. Besides this Fabricius, no
      members of his family appear to have risen to any eminence at Rome; and we must conclude that
      they were either men of inferior talent, or, what is more probable, that being strangers, they
      laboured under great disadvantages, and that the jealousy of the illustrious Roman families,
      plebeian as well as patrician, kept them down, and prevented their maintaining the position
      which their sire had gained. <hi rend="smallcaps">LUSCINUS</hi> is the only cognomen of the
      Fabricii that we meet with under the republic: in the time of the empire we find a Fabricius
      with the cognomen <hi rend="smallcaps">VEIENTO.</hi> There are a few without a cognomen. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>