<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fabia_gens_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:F.fabia_gens_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="F"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="fabia-gens-bio-1" n="fabia_gens_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Fa'bia</surname><addName full="yes">Gens</addName></persName></label></head><p>one of the most ancient patrician gentes at Rome, which traced its origin to Hercules and
      the Arcadian Evander. (<bibl n="Ov. Fast. 2.237">Ov. Fast. 2.237</bibl>, <hi rend="ital">ex
       Pon.</hi> 3.3. 99; <bibl n="Juv. 8.14">Juv. 8.14</bibl>; Plut. <hi rend="ital">Fab. Max.</hi>
      1; Paul. Diac. <hi rend="ital">s. v. Favii,</hi> ed. Müller.) The name is said to have
      originally been Fodii or Fovii, which was believed to have been derived from the fact of the
      first who bore it having invented the method of catching wolves by means of ditches (<hi rend="ital">foveac</hi>), whereas, according to Pliny, (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 18.3">Plin. Nat.
       18.3</bibl>), the name was derived from <hi rend="ital">faba,</hi> a bean, a vegetable which
      the Fabii were said to have first cultivated. The question as to whether the Fabii were a
      Latin or a Sabine gens, is a disputed point. Niebuhr and, after him, Göttling (<hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Röm. Staatsv.</hi> pp. 109, 194,) look upon them as Sabines. But
      the reason adduced does not seem satisfactory; and there is a legend in which their name
      occurs, which refers to a time when the Sabines were not yet incorporated in the Roman state.
      This legend, it is true, is related only by the pseudo-Aurelius Victor (<hi rend="ital">de
       Orig. Gent. Rom.</hi> 22); but it is alluded to also by Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">Romul.</hi>
      22) and Valerius Maximus (2.2.9). When Romulus and Remus, it is said, after the d ath of
      Amulius, offered up sacrifices in the Lupercal, and afterwards celebrated a festival, which
      became the origin of the Lupercalia, the two heroes divided their band of shepherds into two
      parts, and each gave to his followers a special name: Romulus called his the Quinctilii, and
      Remus his the Fabii. (Comp. <bibl n="Ov. Fast. 2.361">Ov. Fast. 2.361</bibl>, &amp;c., 375,
      &amp;c.) This tradition seems to suggest, that the Fabii and Quinctilii in the earliest times
      had the superintendence of the sacra at the Lupercalia, and hence the two colleges of the
      Luperci retained these names even in much later times, although the privilege had ceased to be
      confined to those two gentes. (<bibl n="Cic. Phil. 2.34">Cic. Phil. 2.34</bibl>, 13.15, <hi rend="ital">pro Cael.</hi> 26 ; Propert. 4.26; <bibl n="Plut. Caes. 61">Plut. Caes.
      61</bibl>.) It was from the Fabia gens that one of the Roman tribes derived its name, as the
      Claudia, in later times, was named after the Claudia gens. The Fabii do not act a prominent
      part in history till after the establishment of the commonwealth; and three brothers belonging
      to the gens are said to have been invested with seven successive consulships, from <date when-custom="-485">B. C. 485</date> to 479. The house derived its greatest lustre from the
      patriotic courage and tragic fate of the 306 Fabii in the battle on the Cremera, <date when-custom="-477">B. C. 477</date>. [<hi rend="smallcaps">VIBULANUS</hi>, No. 3.] But the Fabii
      were not distinguished as warriors alone: several members of the gens act an important part
      also in the history of Roman literature and of the arts. The name occurs as late as the second
      century after the Christian aera. The family-names of this gens under the republic are:--<hi rend="smallcaps">AMBUSTUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">BUTEO</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">DORSO</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">LABEO</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">LICINUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">MAXIMUS</hi> (with the agnomens <hi rend="ital">Aemilianus, Allobrogicus,
       Eburnus, Gurges, Rullianus, Servilianus, Verrucosus</hi>), <hi rend="smallcaps">PICTOR</hi>,
      and <hi rend="smallcaps">VMULANUS.</hi> The other cognomens, which do not belong to the gens,
      are given below. [<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</p><p>The only cognomens that occur on coins are <hi rend="ital">Hispaniensis</hi> [see Vol. I. p.
      180a.], <hi rend="ital">Labeo, Maximus,</hi> and <hi rend="ital">Pictor.</hi> The two coins
      represented below have no cognomen upon them, and it is doubtful to whom they are to be
      referred. The former has on the obverse the two-faced head of Janus, and on the reverse the
      prow of a ship: the latter ex <figure/> hhibits on the obverse a female head, and on the
      <figure/> reverse Victory in a biga; the letters <hi rend="smallcaps">EX A. PV.</hi> denote
       <hi rend="ital">Ex Argento Publico.</hi> (Eckhel, vol. v. p. 209, &amp;c.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>