<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.euphorion_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.euphorion_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="euphorion-bio-4" n="euphorion_4"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Eupho'rion</surname></persName></head><p>4. Of Chersonesus, an author of that kind of licentious poetry which was called <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πριάπεια</foreign>, is mentioned by Hephaestion (<hi rend="ital">de
       Metr.</hi> 15.59), who gives three verses, which do not, however, appear to be consecutive,
      but are probably single verses chosen as specimens of the metre. But yet some information may
      be gleaned from them, for the poet refers to rites in honour of the " young Dionysus,"
      celebrated at Pelusium. Hence Meineke infers that this Euphorion was an Egyptian Greek, and
      that the Chersonesus of which he was a native was the city of that name near Alexandria. He
      also conjectures, and upon good grounds, that the " young Dionysus" was Ptolemy Philopator,
      who began to reign in <date when-custom="-220">B. C. 220</date>. It is probable that the passage in
      Strabo (<bibl n="Strabo viii.p.382">viii. p.382</bibl>) refers to this Euphorion, and that
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εὔφρονιος</foreign> in that passage is an error for <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εὐφορίων</foreign>. There is an example of the same confusion in
      Athenaeus (xi. p. 495c.). That those who make this Euphorion the same as the Chalcidian are
      quite wrong, is proved by the fact that the lines are neither hexameters nor elegiacs, but in
      the priapeian metre, which is a kind of antispastic. (Meineke, <hi rend="ital">Analecta
       Alexandrina,</hi> Epim. i.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>