<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eudoxus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eudoxus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="eudoxus-bio-1" n="eudoxus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1358"><surname full="yes">Eudoxus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Εὔδοξος</surname></persName>) of Cnidus, the son of
      Aeschlines, lived about <date when-custom="-366">B. C. 366</date>. He was, according to Diogenes
      Laertius, astronomer, geometer, physician, and legislator. It is only in the first capacity
      that his fame has descended to our day, and he has ore of it than can be justified by any
      account of his astronomical science now in existence. As the probable introducer of the sphere
      into Greece, and perhaps the corrector, upon Egyptian information, of the length of the year,
      he enjoyed a wide and popular reputation, so that Laertius, who does not even mention
      Hipparchus, has given the life of Eudoxus in his usual manner, that is, with the omission of
      all an astronomer would wish to know. According to this writer, Eudoxus went to Athens at the
      age of twenty-three (he had been the pupil of Archytas in geometry, and heard Plato for some
      months, struggling at the same time with poverty. Being dismissed by Plato, but for what
      reason is not stated, his friends raised some money, and he sailed for Egypt, with letters of
      recommendation to Nectanabis, who in his turn recommended him to the priests. With them he
      remained sixteen months, with his chin and eyebrows shaved, and there, according to Laertius,
      he <hi rend="ital">urote</hi> the Octaeteris. Several ancient writers attribute to him the
      invention or introduction of an imiprovement upon the Octaeterides of his predecessors. After
      a time, he came back to Athens with a band of pupils, having in the mean time taught
      philosophy in Cyzicum and the Propontis : he chose Athens, Laertius says, for the purpose of
      vexing Plato, at one of whose symposia he introduced the fashion of the guests reclining in a
      semicircle; and Nicomachus (he adds), the son of Aristotle, reports him to have said that
      pleasure was a good. So much for Laertius, who also refers to some decree which was made in
      honour of Eudoxus, names his son and daughters, states him to have written good works on
      astronomy and geometry, and mentions the curious way in which the bull Apis told his fortune
      when he was in Egypt. Eudoxus died at the age of fifty-three. Phanocritus wrote a work upon
      Eudoxus (<bibl n="Ath. 7.276">Athen. 7.276</bibl>f.), which is lost.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The fragmentary notices of Eudoxus are numerous. Strabo mentions him frequently, and states
       (ii. p. 119, xvii. p. 806) that the observatory of Eudoxus at Cnidus was existing in his
       time, from which he was accustomed to observe the star Canopus. Strabo also says that he
       remained thirteen years in Egypt, and attributes to him the introduction of the odd quarter
       of a day into the value of the year. Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 2.47">Plin. Nat. 2.47</bibl>)
       seems to refer to the same thing. Seneca (<hi rend="ital">Qu. Nat.</hi> 7.3) states him to
       have first brought the motions of the planets (a theory on this subject) from Egypt into
       Greece. Aristotle (<bibl n="Aristot. Met. 12.1073a">Aristot. Met. 12.8</bibl>) states him to
       have made separate spheres for the stars, sun, moon, and planets. Archimedes (<hi rend="ital">in Arenar.</hi>) says he made the dia. meter of the sun nine times as great as that of the
       moon. Vitruvius (<bibl n="Vitr. 9.9">9.9</bibl>) attributes to him the invention of a solar
       dial, called <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀράχνη</foreign> : and so on.</p><p>But all we positively know of Eudoxus is from the poem of <hi rend="smallcaps">ARATUS</hi>
       and the commentary of Hipparchus upon it. From this commentary we learn that Aratus was not
       himself an observer, but was the versifier of the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φαινόμενα</foreign> of Eudoxus, of which Hipparchus has preserved fragments for
       comparison with the version by Aratus. The result is, that though there were by no means so
       many nor so great errors in Eudoxus as in Aratus, yet the opinion which must be formed of the
       work of the former is, that it was written in the rudest state of the science by an observer
       who was not very competent even to the task of looking at the risings and settings of the
       stars. Delambre (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Astr. Anc.</hi> vol. i. p. 107) has given a full
       account of the comparison made by Hipparchus of Aratus with Eudoxus, and of both with his own
       observations. He cannot bring himself to think that Eudoxus knew anything of geometry, though
       it is on record that he wrote geometrical works, in spite of the praises of Proclus, Cicero,
       Ptolemy, Sextus Empiricus (who places him with Hipparchus), &amp;c., &amp;c. Eudoxus, as
       cited by Hipparchus, neither talks like a geometer, nor like a person who had seen the
       heavens he describes: a bad globe, constructed some centuries before his time in Egypt,
       might, for anything that appears, have been his sole authority. But supposing, which is
       likely enough, that he was the first who brought any globe at all into Greece, it is not much
       to be wondered at that his reputation should have been magnified. As to what Proclus says of
       his geometry, see <hi rend="smallcaps">EUCLEIDES.</hi></p><p>Rejecting the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὀκταετηρίς</foreign> mentioned by Laertius,
       which was not a writing, but a period of time, and also the fifth book of Euclid, which one
       manuscript of Euclid attributes to Eudoxus (Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol.
       iv. p. 12), we have the following works, all lost, which he is said to have written : <pb n="83"/></p><div><head><title xml:lang="grc">Γεωμετροίμενα</title></head><p>Mentioned by Proclus and Laertius, which is not, however, to be taken as the title of a
        work: <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὀργανική</foreign>, mentioned by Plutarch: </p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="grc">Ἀστρονομία διʼ ὲπῶν</title></head><p><title xml:lang="grc">Ἀστρονομία διʼ ὲπῶν</title>, by Suidas: two books. </p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="grc">Ἐνοπτρον</title></head><p><title xml:lang="grc">Ἐνοπτρον</title> or <title xml:lang="grc">Κάτοπτρον</title>
        and <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φαινόμενα</foreign> mentioned by Hipparchus, and the first
        by an anonymous biographer of Aratus: <title xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Θεῶν καὶ Κόσμου
         καὶ τῶν Μετεωρολογουμένων</title> mentioned by Eudocia: </p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="grc">Γῆς Περίοδος</title></head><p><title xml:lang="grc">Γῆς Περίοδος</title>, a work often mentioned by Strabo, and by
        many others, as to which Harless thinks Semler's opinion probable, that it was written by
        Eudoxus of Rhodes.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol iv. p. 10, &amp;c.; Weidler, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Astron.;</hi>
       <bibl n="D. L. 3.816">D. L. 3.816</bibl>_<bibl n="D. L. 3.91">91</bibl>; Delambre, <hi rend="ital">Hist. de l'Astron. Anc.</hi> vol. i.; Hipparchus, <hi rend="ital">Comment. in
        Aratum</hi> ;<hi rend="ital"/>Böhmer, <hi rend="ital">Dissertatio de Eudoxo
        Cnidio,</hi> Helmstad. 1715; Ideler, in the <title>Abhandl. der Berliner Akad. d.
        Wissenschaft</title> for the year 1828, p. 189, &amp;c., and for the year 1830, p. 49,
       &amp;c.; Letronne, <hi rend="ital">Journal. d. Sav.</hi> 1840, p. 741, &amp;c.</p></div><byline>[A. <hi rend="smallcaps">DE</hi> M.]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>