<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eudemus_11</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eudemus_11</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="eudemus-bio-11" n="eudemus_11"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Eude'mus</surname></persName></head><p>2. A celebrated anatomist, who lived probably about the third century B. C., as Galen calls
      him a contemporary of Herophilus and Erasistratus. (<hi rend="ital">Comment. in Hippocr. "
       Aphor."</hi> 6.1, vol xviii. pt. 1. p . 7.) He appears to have given particular attention to
      the anatomy and physiology of the nervous system. (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Locis.
       Affect.</hi> 3.14, vol. viii. p. 212.) He considered the metacarpus and metatarsus each to
      consist of five bones (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Usu Part.</hi> 3.8, vol. iii. p. 203 ), on
      which point Galen differed from him, but modern anatomists agree with him. He, however, fell
      into the error of supposing the acromion to be a distinct and separate bone. (Rufus Ephes. <hi rend="ital">de Appell. Part. Corp. Hum.</hi> p. 29.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>