<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eucleides_18</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eucleides_18</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="eucleides-bio-18" n="eucleides_18"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Eucleides</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Εὐκλείδης</label>), a native of <hi rend="smallcaps">MEGARA</hi>, or, according to some less probable accounts, of Gela. He was one of the chief
      of the disciples of Socrates, but before becoming such, he had studied the doctrines, and
      especially the dialectics, of the Eleatics. Socrates on one occasion reproved him for his
      fondness for subtle and captious disputes. (<bibl n="D. L. 2.30">D. L. 2.30</bibl>.) On the
      death of Socrates (<date when-custom="-399">B. C. 399</date>), Eucleides, with most of the other
      pupils of that philosopher, took refuge in Megara, and there established a school which
      distinguished itself chiefly by the cultivation of dialectics. The doctrines of the Eleatics
      formed the basis of his philosophical system. With these he blended the ethical and
      dialectical principles of Socrates. The Eleatic dogma, that there is one universal,
      unchangeable existence, he viewed in a moral aspect, calling this one existence the <hi rend="ital">Good,</hi> but giving it also other names (as Reason, Intelligence, &amp;c.),
      perhaps for the purpose of explaining how the real. though one, appeared to be many. He
      rejected demonstration, attacking not so much the premises assumed as the conclusions drawn,
      and also reasoning from analogy. He is said to have been a main of a somewhat indolent and
      procrastinating disposition. He was the author of six dialogues, none of which, however, have
      come down to us. He has frequently been erroneously confounded with the mathematician of the
      same name. The school which lie founded was called sometimes the Megaric, sometimes the
      Dialectic or Eristic. (<bibl n="D. L. 2.106">D. L. 2.106</bibl>_<bibl n="D. L. 2.108">108</bibl>; Cic. Aead. 2.42; Plut. <hi rend="ital">de Fratr. Am.</hi> 18.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.C.P.M">C.P.M</ref>]</byline><pb n="75"/></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>