<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eubulides_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.eubulides_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="eubulides-bio-4" n="eubulides_4"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Eubu'lides</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Εὐβουλίδης</label>), of Miletus, a philosopher who belonged to
      the Megaric school. It is not stated whether he was the immediate or a later successor of
      Eucleides (<bibl n="D. L. 2.108">D. L. 2.108</bibl>); nor is it said whether he was an elder
      or younger contemporary of Aristotle, against against whom he wrote with great bitterness.
       (<bibl n="D. L. 2.109">D. L. 2.109</bibl>; <bibl n="Ath. 8.354">Athen. 8.354</bibl>; Aristot.
      apud <hi rend="ital">Euseb. Praep. Ev.</hi> 15.2. p. 792.) The statement that Demosthenes
      availed himself of his dialectic instruction (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Vit. X Orat.</hi> p. 845;
      Apul. <hi rend="ital">Orat. de Mag.</hi> p. 18, ed. Bip.; Phot. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
       Cod.</hi> 265, p. 493, ed. Bekk.) is alluded to also in a fragment of an anonymous comic
      poet. (ap. <bibl n="D. L. 2.108">D. L. 2.108</bibl>.) There is no mention of his having
      written any works, but he is said to have invented the forms of several of the most celebrated
      false and captious syllogisms (Diog. Laert. <hi rend="ital">l. e.</hi>), some of which,
      however, such as the <foreign xml:lang="grc">διαλανθάνιον</foreign> and the <foreign xml:lang="grc">κερατίνης</foreign>, were ascribed by others to the later Diodorus Cronus
       (<bibl n="D. L. 1.111">D. L. 1.111</bibl>), and several of them are alluded to by Aristotle
      and even by Plato. Thus the <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐγκεκαλυμμένος</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">διαλανθάνων</foreign> or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἠλέκτρα</foreign>,
      which are different names for one and the same form of syllogism, as well as the <foreign xml:lang="grc">ψευδόμενος</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="grc">κερατίνης</foreign>,
      occur in Aristotle (<hi rend="ital">El. Soph.</hi> 24, 25, 22), and partially also in Plato
       (<hi rend="ital">Euthyd.</hi> p. 276, comp. <hi rend="ital">Theaetet.</hi> pp. 165, 175.) We
      cannot indeed ascertain what motives Eubulides and other Megarics had in forming such
      syllogisms, nor in what form they were dressed up, on account of the scantiness of our
      information upon this portion of the history of Greek philosophy; but we may suppose, with the
      highest degree of probability, that they were directed especially against the sensualistic and
      hypothetical proceedings of the Stoics, and partly also against the definitions of Aristotle
      and the Platonists, and that they were intended to establish the Megaric doctrine of the
      simplicity of existence, which could be arrived at only by direct thought. (H. Ritter, <hi rend="ital">Ueber die Megar. Schule,</hi> in <hi rend="ital">Niebuhr and Brandis' Rhein.
       Mus.</hi> ii. p. 295, &amp;c.; Brandis, <hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Griech. Röm.
       Philos.</hi> i. p. 122, &amp;c.) Apollonius Cronus, the teacher of Diodorus Cronus, and the
      historian Euphantus, are mentioned as pupils of Eubulides. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.CH.A.B">CH. A. B.</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>