<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.epigenes_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.epigenes_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="epigenes-bio-3" n="epigenes_3"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Epi'genes</surname></persName></head><p>2. Of Sicyon, who has been confounded by some with his namesake the comic poet, is mentioned
      by Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θέσπις</foreign>) as the most ancient writer of <hi rend="ital">tragedy.</hi> By the word "tragedy" here we can understand only the old dithyramhic and
      satyrical <foreign xml:lang="grc">τραγῳδία</foreign>, into which it is possible that
      Epigenes may have been the first to introduce other subjects than the original one of the
      fortunes of origin, if at least we may trust the account which we find in Apostolius, Photius,
      and Suidas, of the origin of the proverb <foreign xml:lang="grc">οὐδὲν πρὸς τὸν
       Δτόνυσον</foreign>. This would clearly he one of the earliest steps in the gradual
      transformation of the old dithyrambic performance into the dramatic tragedy of later times,
      and may tend to jutify the statement <pb n="37"/> which ascribes the invention of tragedy to
      the Sicyonians. We do not know the period at which Epigenes flourished, and the point was a
      doubtful one in the time of Suidas, who says (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θέσπις</foreign>) that, according to some, he was the 16th before
      Thespis, while, according to others, he almost immediately preceded him. (See Müller, <hi rend="ital">Dor.</hi> 4.7.8; Meineke, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Crit. Com. Graec.</hi> p. 354;
      Arist. <hi rend="ital">Poet.</hi> 3; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. ii. pp.
      160, 303, vol. iv. p. 10 <hi rend="ital">; Dict. of Ant.</hi> p. 980a.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.E">E.E</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>