<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:D.dracontius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:D.dracontius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="D"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="dracontius-bio-1" n="dracontius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Draco'ntius</surname></persName></head><p>a Christian poet, of whose personal history we know nothing, except that he was a Spanish
      presbyter, flourished during the first half of the fifth century, and died about <date when-custom="450">A. D. 450</date>.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title>Hexaemeron</title></head><p>His chief production, entitled <title>Hexaemeron,</title> in heroic measure, extending to
        575 lines, contains a description of the six days of the creation, in addition to which we
        possess a fragment in 198 elegiac verses addressed to the younger Theodosius, in which the
        author implores forgiveness of God for certain errors in his greater work, and excuses
        himself to the emperor for having neglected to celebrate his victories. Although the
        Hexaemeron is by no means destitute of spirit, and plainly indicates that the writer had
        studied carefully the models of classical antiquity, we can by no means adopt the criticism
        of Isidorus: " Dracontius composnit heroicis versibus Hexaemeron creations mundi et
        luculenter, quod composuit, scripsit," if we are to understand that any degree of clearness
        or perspicuity is implied by the word <hi rend="ital">luculenter,</hi> for nothing is more
        characteristic of this piece than obscurity of thought and perplexity of expression. Indeed
        these defects are sometimes pushed to such extravagant excess, that we feel disposed to
        agree with Barthius (<hi rend="ital">Advers.</hi> 23.19), that Dracontius did not always
        understand himself.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>It is to be observed that the Hexaemeron exists under two forms. <bibl>It was published
          in its original shape along with the Genesis of Claudius Marius Victor, at Paris, 8vo.
          1560</bibl>; <bibl>in the "Corpus Christianorum Poetarum," edited by G. Fabricius, Basil.
          4to. 1564</bibl>; <bibl>with the notes of Weitzius, Franc 8vo. 1610</bibl>; <bibl>in the
          "Magna Bibliotheca Patrum," Colon. fol. 1618, vol. vi. par. 1</bibl>; <bibl>and in the "
          Bibliotheca Patrum," Paris, fol. 1624, vol. viii.</bibl></p><p>In the course of the seventh century, however, Eugenius, bishop of Toledo, by the orders
         of king Chindasuindus, undertook to revise, correct, and improve the Six Days; and, not
         content with repairing and beautifying the old structure, supplied what he considered a
         defect in the plan by adding an account of the Seventh Day. In this manner the performance
         was extended to 634 lines. <bibl>The enlarged edition was first published by Sirmond along
          with the Opuscula of Eugenius, Paris, 8vo. 1619.</bibl> In the second volume of Sirmond's
         works (Ven. 1728), p. 890, we read the letter of Eugenius to Chindasuindus, from which we
         learn that the prelate engaged in the task by the commands of that prince; and in p. 903 we
         find the Elegy addressed to Theodosius. <bibl>The Eugenian version was reprinted by
          Rivinus, Lips. 8vo. 1651</bibl>, and <bibl>in the " Bibliotheca Maxima Patrum," Lugdun.
          vol. ix. p. 724.</bibl>
         <bibl>More recent editions have appeared by F. Arevalus, Rom. 4to. 1791</bibl>, and by
          <bibl>J. B. Carpzovius, Helmst. 8vo. 1794</bibl>.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Isidorus, <hi rend="ital">de Scrip. Eccl.</hi> 100.24; Honorius, <hi rend="ital">de Scrip.
        Eccles.</hi> lib. 3. c.28; Ildefonsus, <hi rend="ital">de Scrip. Eccles.</hi> 100.14, all of
       whom will be found in the <hi rend="ital">Bibliotheca Ecclesiastica</hi> of Fabricius.</p></div><div><head>Confusion with the others named Dracontius</head><p>The Dracontius mentioned above must not be confounded with the Dracontius to whom
       Athanasius addressed an epistle; nor with the Dracontius on whom Palladius bestowed the
       epithets of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔνδοξος</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θαυμαστός</foreign>; nor with the Dracontius, bishop of Pergamus, named by Socrates and
       Sozomenus.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>