<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:D.donatus_aelius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:D.donatus_aelius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="D"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="donatus-aelius-bio-1" n="donatus_aelius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Dona'tus</forename><surname full="yes">Ae'lius</surname></persName></label></head><p>or, with all his titles as they are found in MSS., <hi rend="ital">Aelius Donatus Vir Clarus
       Orator Urbis Romae,</hi> was a celebrated grammarian and rhetorician, who taught at Rome in
      the middle of the fourth century, and was the preceptor of Saint Jerome.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Latin Grammar</head><p>Donatus' most famous work is a system of Latin Grammar, which has formed the groundwork of
        most elementary treatises upon the same subject, from the period when he flourished down to
        our own times. It has usually been published in the form of two or more distinct and
        separate tracts: 1. <hi rend="ital">Ars s. Editio Prima, de literis, syllabis, pedibus, et
         tonis;</hi> 2. <hi rend="ital">Editio Secunda, de octo parlibus orationis;</hi> to which
        are commonly annexed, <hi rend="ital">De barbarismo; De soloecisnmo; De ceteris vitiis; De
         metaplasmo; De schmatibus; De tropis ;</hi> but in the recent edition of Lindemann these
        are all more correctly considered as constituting one connected whole, and are combined
        under one general title, taken from the Santenian MS. preserved in the Royal Library of
        Berlin, <title xml:lang="la">Donati Ars Grammatica tribus libris comprelcnsa.</title></p><p>It was the common schoolbook of the middle ages; insomuch, that in the English of
        Longlande and Chaucer a <hi rend="ital">donat or donet</hi> is equivalent to a lesson of any
        kind, and hence came to mean an introduction in general. Thus among the works of Bishop
        Pecock are enumerated <hi rend="ital">The</hi>
        <hi rend="smallcaps">DONAT</hi>, <hi rend="ital">into Christian religion,</hi> and <hi rend="ital">The folower to the</hi>
        <hi rend="smallcaps">DONAT</hi>, while Cotgrave quotes an old French proverb, <hi rend="ital">Les diables estoient encores a leur</hi>
        <hi rend="smallcaps">DONAT</hi>, <hi rend="ital">i. e.</hi> The devils were but yet in their
        grammar. These, and other examples, are collected in Warton's <hi rend="ital">History of
         English Poetry,</hi> sect. viii.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>The popularity of the " Ars Grammatica," especially of the second part, " De octo
         partibus Orationis," is sufficiently evinced by the prodigious number of editions which
         appeared during the infancy of printing, most of them in gothic characters, without date,
         or name of place, orof printer, and the typographical history of no work, with the
         exception of the Scriptures, has excited more interest among bibliographers, or given them
         more trouble. Even before the invention of printing from movable types, several editions
         seem to have been thrown off from blocks, and fragments of these have been preserved in
         various collections. <bibl>The three parts will be found in the collection of Putschius
           (<hi rend="ital">Grammaticae Latinae Auctores Antiqui,</hi> Hanov. 4to. 1605)</bibl>,
         together with the commentary of Sergius on the prima and secunda editio; and <bibl>that of
          Servius Marius Honoratus, on the secunda editio only (see pp. 1735, 1743, 1767, 1779,
          1826)</bibl>; and <bibl>also in Lindemann's " Corpus Grammaticorum Latinorum Veterum,"
          vol. i. Lips. 1831.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Commentaries on Terence</head><p>In addition to the Ars Grammatica, we possess introductions (<hi rend="ital">enarrationes</hi>) and scholia, by Donatus, to five out of the six plays of Terence, those
        to the Heautontimorumenos having been lost. The prefaces contain a succinct account of the
        source from which each piece was derived, and of the class to which it belongs; a statement
        of the time at which it was exhibited; notices respecting the distribution of the
        characters; and sundry particulars connected with stage technicalities. The commentaries are
        full of interesting and valuable remarks and illustrations ; but from the numerous
        repetitions and contradictions, and, above all, the absurd and puerile traits here and there
        foisted in, it is manifest that they have been unmercifully interpolated and corrupted by
        later and less skilful hands. Some critics, indeed, have gone so far as to believe that
        Donatus never committed his observations to writing, and that these scholia are merely
        scraps, compiled from the notes of pupils, of dictata or lectures delivered viva voce; but
        this idea does not well accord with the words of St. Jerome in the first of the passages to
        which a reference is given at the end of this article.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>Of the commentary on Terence, at least four editions, separate from the text, appeared
         during the fifteenth century. <bibl>That which is believed to be the first is a folio, in
          Roman characters, without place, date, or printer's name, but was probably published at
          Cologne, about 1470-1472</bibl>; <bibl>the second at Venice, by Spira, fol. 1472</bibl>;
          <bibl>the third at Rome, by Sweynheym and Pannartz, fol. 1472</bibl>; <bibl>the fourth at
          Milan, by Zarotus, fol. 1476.</bibl>
         <bibl>It will be found attached to all complete editions of the dramatist.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Commentary on Virgil</head><p>Servius, in his annotations upon Virgil, refers, in upwards of forty different places, to
        a Donatus, who must have composed a commentary upon the Eclogues, Georgies, and Aeneid. "
        Scholia in Aeneida" bearing the name of Donatus, and corresponding, for the most part, with
        the quotations of Servius, are still extant, but, from their inferior tone and character,
        have been generally ascribed to <hi rend="ital">Tiberius Claudius Donatus,</hi> who is
        noticed below. They are divided into twelve books, to which a supplemental thirteenth was to
        have been added ; the concluding portions of the fourth and eighth, and the commencement of
        the sixth and twelfth, are wanting. Their chief object is to point out the beauties and
        skill of the poet, rather than to explain his difficulties; but the writer, in a letter
        subjoined <pb n="1066"/> to the twelfth book, announces his intention, should a life already
        far advanced be prolonged, of compiling, from ancient authorities, a description of the
        persons, places, herbs, and trees, enumerated in the poem.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The commentaries upon the Aeneid were first discovered by Jo. Jovianus Pontanus,
          were first published from the copy in his library, by Scipio Capycius, Neap. fol.
          1535</bibl>, and were <bibl>inserted by G. Fabricius in the " Corpus Interpretum
          Virgilianorum."</bibl></p><p>The text is very corrupt and imperfect, but it would appear that MSS. still exist which
         present it in a more pure and complete form, although these have never been collated, or at
         least given to the world. (See Burmann, in the pref. to his ed. of Virgil.)</p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Hieron. <hi rend="ital">ad vers. Ruf</hi> vol. iii. p. 92, ed. Bas., in Euseb. Chron. ad
       ann. ccclv p. c. ; in <hi rend="ital">Eccles.</hi> c. i.; see also Lud. Schopfen, <hi rend="ital">De Terentio et Donato,</hi> 8vo, Bonn. 1824, and <hi rend="ital">Specimen emend.
        in Ael. Donati comment. Terent.</hi> 4to, Bonn. 1826. Osann, <hi rend="ital">Beiträge
        zur Griechischen und Römischen Litteraturgeschichte,</hi> Leip. 1839.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>