<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:D.domitianus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:D.domitianus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="D"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="domitianus-bio-1" n="domitianus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Domitia'nus</surname></persName></head><p>or with his full name T. <hi rend="smallcaps">FLAVIUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">DOMITIANUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">AUGUSTUS</hi>, was the younger of Vespasian's sons by his first wife
      Domitilla. He succeeded his elder brother Titus as emperor, and reigned from <date when-custom="81">A. D. 81</date> to 96. He was born at Rome, on the 24th of October, <date when-custom="52">A. D.
       52</date>, the year in which his father was consul designatus. Suetonius relates that
      Domitian in his youth led such a wretched life, that he never used a silver vessel, and that
      he prostituted himself for money. The position which his father then occupied precludes the
      possibility of ascribing this mode of life to poverty, and if the account be true, we must
      attribute this conduct to his bad natural disposition. When Vespasian was proclaimed emperor,
      Domitian, who was then eighteen years old, happened to be at Rome, where he and his friends
      were persecuted by Vitellius; Sabinus, Vespasian's brother, was murdered, and it was only with
      the greatest difficulty that Domitian escaped from the burning temple of the capitol, and
      concealed himself until the victory of his father's party was decided. After the fall of
      Vitellius, Domitian was proclaimed Caesar, and obtained the city praetorship with consular
      power. As his father was still absent in the east, Domitian and Mucianus undertook the
      administration of Italy until Vespasian returned. The power which was thus put into his hands
      was abused by the dissolute young man in a manner which shewed to the world, but too plainly,
      what was to be expected, if he should ever succeed to the imperial throne: he put several
      persons to death, merely to gratify his desire of taking vengeance on his personal enemies; he
      seduced many wives, and lived surrounded by a sort of harem, and arbitrarily deposed and
      appointed so many magistrates, both in the city and Italy, that his father with a bitter
      sarcasm wrote to him, "I wonder that you do not send some one to succeed me." Being jealous of
      the military glory of his father and brother, he resolved upon marching against Civilis in
      Gaul, in spite of the advice of all his friends to remain at Rome; but he did not advance
      further than Lugdunum, for on his arrival there he received intelligence of Cerealis having
      already conquered the rebel.</p><p>When his father at length arrived at Rome, Domitian, who was conscious of his evil conduct,
      is said not to have ventured to meet him, and to have pretended not to be in the perfect
      possession of his mind. Vespasian, however, knew his disposition, and throughout his reign
      kept him as much as possible away from public affairs; but in order to display his rank and
      station, Domitian always accompanied his father and brother when they appeared in public, and
      when they celebrated their triumph after the Jewish war, he followed them in the procession
      riding on a white warsteed. He lived partly in the same house with his father, and partly on
      an estate near the Mons Albanus, where he was surrounded by a number of courtezans. While he
      thus led a private life, he devoted a great part of his time to the composition of poetry and
      the recitation of his productions. Vespasian, who died in <date when-custom="79">A. D. 79</date>,
      was succeeded by his elder son Titus, and Domitian used publicly to say, that he was deprived
      of his share in the government by a forgery in his father's will, for that it had been the
      wish of the latter that the two brothers should reign in common. But this was mere calumny :
      Domitian hated his brother, and made several attempts upon his life. Titus behaved with the
      utmost forbearance towards him, but followed the example of his father in not allowing
      Domitian to take any part in the administration of public affairs, although he was invested
      with the consulship seven times during the reigns of his father and brother. The early death
      of Titus, in <date when-custom="81">A. D. 81</date>, was in all probability the work of Domitian.
      Suetonius states that Domitian ordered the sick Titus to be left entirely alone, before he was
      quite dead; Dio Cassius says that he accelerated his death by ordering him while in a fever to
      be put into a vessel filled with snow; and other writers plainly assert, that Titus was
      poisoned or murdered by Domitian.</p><p>On the ides of September, <date when-custom="81">A. D. 81</date>, the day on which Titus died,
      Domitian was proclaimed emperor by the soldiers. During the first years of his reign he
      continued, indeed, to indulge in strange passions, but Suetonius remarks that he manifested a
      pretty equal mixture of vices and virtues. Among the latter we must mention, that he kept a
      very strict superintendence over the governors of provinces, so that in his reign they are
      said to have been juster than they ever were afterwards. He also enacted several useful laws:
      he forbade, for example, the castration of male children, and restricted the increasing
      cultivation of the vine, whereby the growth of corn was neglected. He endeavoured to correct
      the frivolous and licentious conduct of the higher classes, and shewed great liberality and
      moderation on many occasions. He further took an active part in the administration of justice;
      which conduct, praiseworthy as it then was, became disgusting afterwards, when, assisted by a
      large class of delatores, he openly made justice the slave of his cruelty and tyranny; for,
      during the latter years of his reign he acted as one of the most cruel tyrants that ever
      disgraced a throne, and as Suetonius remarks, his very virtues were turned into vices. The
      cause of this change in his conduct appears, independent of his natural bias for what was bad,
      to have been his boundless ambition, injured vanity, jealousy of others, and cowardice, which
      were awakened and roused by the failure of his <pb n="1062"/> undertakings and other
      occurrences of the time. In <date when-custom="84">A. D. 84</date> he undertook an expedition
      against the Chatti, which does not seem to have been altogether unsuccessful, for we learn
      from Frontinus (<hi rend="ital">Strateg.</hi> 1. 3), that he constructed the frontier wall
      between the free Germans and those who were subject to Rome, so that he must at any rate have
      succeeded in confining the barbarians within their own territory. After his return to Rome he
      celebrated a triumph, and assumed the name of Germanicus. In the same year Agricola, whose
      success and merits excited his jealousy, was recalled to Rome, ostensibly for the purpose of
      celebrating a triumph; but he was never sent back to his post, which was given to another
      person. [<hi rend="smallcaps">AGRICOLA.</hi>] The most dangerous enemy of Rome at that time
      was Decebalus, king of the Dacians. Domitian himself took the field against him, but the real
      management of the war was left to his generals. Simultaneously with this war another was
      carried on against the Marcomanni and Quadi, who had refused to furnish the Romans with the
      assistance against Decebalus, which they were bound to do by a treaty. The Romans were
      defeated by them, and the consequence was, that Domitian was obliged to conclude peace with
      Decebalus on very humiliating terms, <date when-custom="87">A. D. 87</date>. [<hi rend="smallcaps">DECEBALUS.</hi>] Another dangerous occurrence was the revolt of L. Antonius in Upper
      Germany; but this storm was luckily averted by an unexpected overflow of the Rhine over its
      banks, which prevented the German auxiliaries, whom Antonius expected, from joining him; so
      that the rebel was easily conquered by L. Appius Norbanus, in <date when-custom="91">A. D.
      91</date>. An insurrection of the Nasamones in Africa was of less importance, and was easily
      suppressed by Flaccus, the governor of Numidia.</p><p>But it is the cruelty and tyranny of Domitian that have given his reign an unenviable
      notoriety. His natural tendencies burst forth with fresh fury after the Dacian war. His fear
      and his injured pride and vanity led him to delight in the misfortunes and sufferings of those
      whom he hated and envied; and the most distinguished men of the time, especially among the
      senators, had to bleed for their excellence; while, on the other hand, he tried to win the
      populace and the soldiers by large donations, and by public games and fights in the circus and
      amphitheatre, in which even women appeared among the gladiators, and in which he himself took
      great delight. For the same reason he increased the pay of the soldiers, and the sums he thus
      expended were obtained from the rich by violence and murder; and when in the end he found it
      impossible to obtain the means for paying his soldiers, he was obliged to reduce their number.
      The provinces were less exposed to his tyranny, and it was especially Rome and Italy that felt
      his iron grasp. The expression of thought and sentiment was suppressed or atrociously
      persecuted, unless men would degrade themselves to flatter the tyrant. The silent fear and
      fearful silence which prevailed during the latter years of Domitian's reign in Rome and Italy
      are briefly but energetically described by Tacitus in the introduction to his Life of
      Agricola, and his vices and tyranny are exposed in the strongest colours by the withering
      satire of Juvenal. All the philosophers who lived at Rome were expelled; from which, however,
      we cannot infer, as some writers do, that he hated all philosophical and scientific pursuits;
      the cause being in all probability no other than his vanity and ambition, which could not bear
      to be obscured by others. Christian writers attribute to him a persecution of the Christians
      likewise; but there is no other evidence for it, and the belief seems to have arisen from the
      strictness with which he exacted the tribute from the Jews, and which may have caused much
      suffering to the Christians also.</p><p>As in all similar cases, the tyrant's own cruelty brought about his ruin. Three officers of
      his court, Parthenius, Sigerius, and Entellus, whom Domitian intended to put to death (this
      secret was betrayed to them by Domitia, the emperor's wife, who was likewise on the list),
      formed a conspiracy against his life. Stephanus, a freedman, who was employed by the
      conspirators, contrived to obtain admission to the emperor's bed-room, and gave him a letter
      to read. While Domitian was perusing the letter, in which the conspirators' plot was revealed
      to him, Stephanus plunged a dagger into his abdomen. A violent struggle ensued between the
      two, until the other conspirators arrived. Domitian fell, after having received seven wounds,
      on the 18th of September, <date when-custom="96">A. D. 96</date>. Apollonius of Tyana, who was then
      at Ephesus, at the moment Domitian was murdered at Rome, is said to have run across the
      market-place, and to have exclaimed, "That is right, Stephanus, slay the murderer!"</p><p>There are few rulers who better deserve the name of a cruel tyrant than Domitian. The last
      three years of his reign forn one of the most frightful periods that occur in the history of
      man; but he cannot be called a brutal monster or a madman like Caligula and Nero, for he
      possessed talent and a cultivated mind; and although Pliny and Quintilian, who place his
      poetical productions by the side of those of the greatest masters, are obviously guilty of
      servile flattery, yet his poetical works cannot have been entirely without merit. His fondness
      and esteem for literature are attested by the quinquennial contest which he instituted in
      honour of the Capitoline Jupiter, and one part of which consisted of a musical contest. Both
      prose writers and poets in Greek as well as in Latin recited their productions, and the
      victors were rewarded with golden crowns. He further instituted the pension for distinguished
      rhetoricians, which Quintilian enjoyed; and if we look at the comparatively flourishing
      condition of Roman literature during that time, we cannot help thinking that it was, at least
      in great measure, the consequence of the influence which he exercised and of the encouragement
      which he afforded. It is extremely probable that we still possess one of the literary
      productions of Domitian in the Latin paraphrase of Aratus's Phaenomena, which is usually
      attributed to Germanicus, the grandson of Augustus. The arguments for this opinion have been
      clearly set forth by Rutgersius (<hi rend="ital">Var. Lect.</hi> iii. p. 276), and it is <figure/>
      <pb n="1063"/> also adopted by Niebuhr. (Tac. <hi rend="ital">Hist.</hi> iii, 59, &amp;c.,
      4.2, &amp;c., <hi rend="ital">Agric.</hi> 39, 42, 45; Suet. <hi rend="ital">Domitian. ;</hi>
      Dio Cass. lib. lxvi. and lxvii.; Juvenal, <hi rend="ital">Satir. ;</hi>
      <bibl n="Quint. Inst. 4.1.2">Quint. Inst. 4.1.2</bibl>, &amp;c., 10.1.91, &amp;c.; Niebuhr,
       <hi rend="ital">Lectures on Roman Hist.</hi> ii. pp. 234-250.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>