<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cyrillus_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cyrillus_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="cyrillus-bio-3" n="cyrillus_3"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-2110"><surname full="yes">Cyrillus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Κύριλλος</surname></persName>), ST., bishop of <hi rend="smallcaps">JERUSALEM</hi>, was probably born at Jerusalem, <date when-custom="315">A. D.
       315</date>. He was ordained deacon by Macarius in the church of his native place, about 334
      or 335; and, by Maximus, who succeeded Macarius, he was elected presbyter, 345. When Maximus
      died, he was chosen to fill the episcopal chair, 351, in the reign of Constantius. It was
      about the commencement of his episcopate, on the 7th of May, 351, about 9 o'clock, a. m., that
      a great luminous cross, exceeding in brightness the splendour of the sun, appeared for several
      hours over mount Golgotha, and extended as far as the mount of Olives. His letter to
      Constantius, which is preserved, gives a full account of this phenomenon. Soon after, he
      became involved in disputes with Acacius, the Arian bishop of Caesareia, which embittered the
      greater part of his subsequent life. The controversy between them arose about the rights of
      their respective sees; but mutual recriminations concerning the faith soon followed. Acacius
      accused Cyril of affirming, that the Son was like the Father in regard to essence, or that he
      was <hi rend="ital">consubstantial</hi> with Him. During two successive years Cyril was
      summoned by his opponent to appear before a proper tribunal, but did not obey the call.
      Exasperated no doubt by this steadfast disregard of his authority, the Caesarean bishop
      hastily got together a council, which deposed Cyril in 358. The charge against him was, that
      he had exposed to sale the treasures of the church, and in a time of famine applied the
      proceeds to the use of the poor. Among these treasures was specified a sacred garment woven
      with golden threads and presented by Constantine the Great, which afterwards came into the
      possession of an actress. The excommunicated prelate, however, appealed to a larger council;
      and Constantius himself assented to the justice of the appeal. After his deposition, he went
      to Antioch, in which city he found the church without a pastor, and thence to Tarsus. There he
      lived on terms of intimacy with Sylvanus the bishop, and frequently preached in his church to
      the people, who were delighted with his discourses. The larger council to which he appealed
      was held at Seleuceia, consisting of more than 160 bishops. Before it Acacius was summoned by
      Cyril to appear, but he refused. The latter was restored by the council. But his persevering
      adversary inflamed the mind of the emperor against him, and in conformity with the wish of
      Acacius a synod was summoned at Constantinople; Cyril was again deposed and sent into
      banishment in 360. At this council former charges were raked up against him, and new ones
      added by Acacius. On the death of Constantius, Cyril was recalled from exile, and restored a
      second time to his episcopate in 362. In the year 363, when attempts were made by Julian to
      rebuild the temple at Jerusalem, he is said to have predicted, from a comparison of the
      prophecies in Daniel and the New Testament, that the enterprise would be defeated. Under
      Jovian and in the beginning of Valens's reign, he lived in the quiet possession of his office.
      On the death of Acacius, he appointed Philumenus over the church at Caesareia; but the
      Eutychians deposed the newly chosen bishop, and substituted one Cyril in his place. The bishop
      of Jerusalem, however, deposed him who had been elevated by the Eutychian party, and set over
      the Caesarean church Gelasius, his sister's son. Soon after, by order of Valens, Cyril was
      banished a third time from Jerusalem, in 367. On the emperor's death, he returned to his
      native place, and reassumed the functions of his office the third time, 378. Under Theodosius
      he continued in the undisturbed possession of the episcopal chair till his death. He seems,
      however, to have incurred the displeasure of his own church, rent and disfigured as it was
      with schisms, heresies, and moral corruption. Perplexed and uneasy, he asked assistance from
      the council of Antioch. (379.) Accordingly, Gregory of Nyssa was deputed by the council to go
      to Jerusalem and to pacify the church in that place. But the peace-maker departed without
      accomplishing the object of his mission. Cyril was present at the second general council held
      at Constantinople in 381, in which he was honoured with a high eulogium. It is supposed that
      he attended the council of Constantinople in 383. His death took place in 386.</p><div><head>Work</head><p>His works consist of eighteen lectures to catechumens (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Κατηχήσεις φωτιζομένων</foreign>), and five to the newly-baptized (<foreign xml:lang="grc">μυσταγωψικαὶ κατηχήσεις πρὸς τοὺς νεοφωτίστους</foreign>). These were
       delivered about the year 347, in his youth, as Jerome says, and when he was still presbyter.
       The first eighteen are chiefly doctrinal, consisting of an exposition of the articles in the
       creed of the church; while the last five respect the rights of baptism, chrism, and the
       Lord's supper. These treatises have very great value in the eyes of the theologian, inasmuch
       as they present a more complete system of theology and a more minute description of the rites
       of the church at that early period than are to be found in any other writer of the same age.
       In their style and language there is nothing florid or oratorical; the composition is plain,
       didactic, and inelegant. The authenticity of these catecheses has been questioned by some,
       especially by Oudinus (<hi rend="ital">de Script. Eccl. Ant.</hi> vol. i. p. 459, et seq.),
       yet no good ground has been adduced for entertaining such doubts. It has been thought, with
       reason, that Cyril was once a Semi-Arian, and <pb n="920"/> that after the Nicene creed had
       been generally adopted, he approved of and embraced its dogmas. Epiphanius speaks in express
       terms of his Semi-Arianism, and even Touttee acknowledges the fact. His coldness towards the
       Nicenians and his intinmacy with the Eusebians, give colour to this opinion. But he was by no
       means disposed to carry out doctrines beyond the written word, or to wander into the regions
       of speculation. His published writings attest his orthodoxy and firm belief in the Nicene
       creed.</p><p>Among his works are also preserved a homily on the case of the paralytic man (John 5.1-16),
       and a letter to the emperor Constantius, giving an account of the luminous cross which
       appeared at Jerusalem, 351.</p></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>His writings were published in Latin at Paris, 1589</bibl>, and <bibl>his Catecheses
        in Greek at the same place, 1564, 8vo.</bibl>; <bibl>in Greek and Latin at Cologne,
        1564.</bibl><bibl>Prevotius edited them all in Greek and Latin at Paris in 1608, 4to.</bibl>; and
       afterwards <bibl>Dion Petavius at Paris, 1622, fol.</bibl> They were reprinted from
       Prevotius's edition, at <bibl>Paris in 1631, fol.</bibl>, along with the works of Synesius of
       Cyrene. A much better edition than any of the preceding was that of <bibl>Thomas Milles, in
        Greek and Latin, Oxford, 1703, fol.</bibl> The best is that of the Benedictine monk,
        <bibl>A. A. Touttee, Paris, 1720, fol.</bibl> The preface contains a very elaborate
       dissertation on the life and writings of Cyril.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>See Touttee's <hi rend="ital">preface;</hi> Cave's <hi rend="ital">Historia Literaria,</hi>
       vol. i. pp. 211, 212, Oxford, 1740; Schröck, <hi rend="ital">Kirchengeschichte,</hi>
       vol. xii. p. 343, &amp;c.; Theodoret, <hi rend="ital">Histor. Ecclesiast.</hi> libb. ii. and
       v.; Tillemont, <hi rend="ital">Eccles. Mem.</hi> vol. viii.; Guerike, <hi rend="ital">Handbuch der Kirchengeschichte,</hi> vol. i. pp. 344, 345, note 3, <hi rend="ital">fünfte Auflage;</hi> Murdock's <hi rend="ital">Mosheim,</hi> vol. i. p. 241, note
       16.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.S.D">S.D</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>