<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.culleo_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.culleo_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="culleo-bio-2" n="culleo_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Cu'lleo</surname></persName></head><p>1. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Q.</forename><surname full="yes">Terentius</surname><addName full="yes">Culleo</addName></persName>, belonged to a family of praetorian rank, and was a
      senator of considerable distinction. (<bibl n="V. Max. 5.2.5">V. Max. 5.2.5</bibl>.) He was
      taken prisoner in the course of the second Punic war, but at what time is uncertain, and
      obtained his liberty at the conclusion of the war in B. c, 201. To shew his gratitude to P.
      Scipio, he followed his triumphal car, wearing the pileus or cap of liberty, like an
      emancipated slave; and subsequently, on the death of Scipio, he attended his funeral, walking
      before the bier with the cap of liberty again on his head, and he likewise distributed mulsum,
      or sweet wine, among the attendants of the funeral.</p><p>In <date when-custom="-195">B. C. 195</date>, Culleo was one of the three ambassadors who were
      sent to Carthage to complain that Hannibal was forming the design of making war upon the
      Romans in conjunction with Antiochus. In <date when-custom="-187">B. C. 187</date> Culleo was
      praetor peregrinus, and he was appointed by the senate in this year as the commissioner to
      conduct the inquiry respecting the money of Antiochus, which was said to have been
      misappropriated by L. Scipio Asiaticus and his legates. This appointment was made under a
      plebiscitum which had been carried chiefly through the influence of Cato the censor, and which
      referred to the senate to nominate a commissioner to inquire into the matter. The respect
      which Culleo had paid to P. Scipio was well known, and the friends of the Scipios probably
      supported his appointment for that reason; though it is stated, on the other hand, that his
      nomination to the office was brought about by the enemies of Scipio, because he was in reality
      an enemy to the family, and had been guilty of hypocrisy in the honours he had paid to his
      deliverer from captivity. But however this may be, L. Scipio and others were condemned by him;
      from which we may conclude, either that he was in reality in league with the party opposed to
      the Scipios, or that their guilt was so clear that he dared not acquit even his friends.</p><p>In <date when-custom="-184">B. C. 184</date>, Culleo was an unsuccessful candidate for the
      consulship, and in 181 was one of the three ambassadors sent to Masinissa and Carthage to ask
      for assistance in the war against Perseus. (<bibl n="Liv. 30.43">Liv. 30.43</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 30.45">45</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 33.47">33.47</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 38.42">38.42</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 38.55">55</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 39.32">39.32</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 42.35">42.35</bibl>; <bibl n="V. Max. 5.2.5">V. Max. 5.2.5</bibl>; Plut. <hi rend="ital">Apophth.</hi> p. 196.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>