<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.corippus_flavius_cresconius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.corippus_flavius_cresconius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="corippus-flavius-cresconius-bio-1" n="corippus_flavius_cresconius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Corippus</addName>, <forename full="yes">Fla'vius</forename><surname full="yes">Cresco'nius</surname></persName></label></head><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">de laudibus Justini Augusti Minoris heroico carmine libri
         IV.</title></head><p>In the year 1581 a work issued from the press of Plantin at Antwerp, edited by Michael
        Ruiz, a Spaniard, and bearing the title <title xml:lang="la">Corippi Africani Grammatici
         fragmentum carminis in laudem imperatoris Justini Minoris; Carmen panegyricum in laudem
         Anastasii quaestoris et magistri; de laudibus Justini Augusti Minoris heroico carmine libri
         IV.</title></p><p>The two first mentioned works, of which the first is imperfect, are extremely short, and
        in reality are merely the preface and epistle dedicatory of the third, which extends to
        nearly 1600 hexameter lines, and is a formal panegyric, conceived in all the hyperbolical
        extravagance of the Byzantine school, in honour of the younger Justin, who swayed the empire
        of the East from <date when-custom="565">A. D. 565</date> to 578. Ruiz asserts, that these pieces
        were faithfully copied from a MS. more than 700 years old; but of this document he gives no
        description; he does not state how it had come into his possession, nor where it was
        deposited ; it has never been found; and no other being known to exist, the text depends
        upon the editio princeps alone.</p><p>Corippus, in the preface above mentioned, refers to a poem which he had previously
        composed upon the African wars. <quote xml:lang="la" rend="blockquote"><l>Quid Libycas
          gentes, quid Syrtica proelia dicam</l><l>Jam libris completa meis ?</l></quote></p><p>Now, Johannes Cuspianus " De Caesaribus et Imperatoribus" declares, that he saw in the
        royal library at Buda a poem in eight books entitled <title xml:lang="la">Johannis</title>
        by <hi rend="ital">Flavius Cresconius Corippus,</hi> the subject of which was the war
        carried on against the Africans by Johannes Patricius, and he quotes the first five lines
        beginning: <quote xml:lang="la" rend="blockquote"><l>Signa, duces gentesque feras, Martisque
          ruinas.</l></quote></p><p>Moreover, we can prove from history that Cuspianus was at Buda between the years 1510 and
        1515. Secondly, it is known that as late as 1532 a MS. "De Bellis Libycis" was preserved in
        the monastery of the Monte Casino, bearing the name of Cresconius, the first word being "
        Victoris." This does not correspond, it will be observed, with the commencement given by
        Cuspianus; but the difference, as we shall soon see, is only apparent. Both of the above
        MSS. have disappeared and left no trace behind them. Lastly, in the Vallicellan library at
        Rome is a MS. of the tenth century, containing a collection of ancient canons, to which the
        transcriber has prefixed the following note : " Concordia Canonum a Cresconio Africano
        episcopo digesta sub capitulis trecentis: iste nimirum Cresconius bella et victorias, quas
        Johannes Patricius apud Africam de Saracenis gessit, hexametris versibus descripsit,"
        &amp;c. From this it was inferred by many scholars, that Cresconius must have flourished
        towards the end of the seventh century, since we learn from Cedrenus that, in 697, the
        Arabians overran Africa, and were expelled by a certain Johannes Patricius despatched
        thither by the emperor Leontius; hence also Corippus and Cresconius were generally
        distinguished from each other, the former being supposed to be the author of the panegyric
        upon Justin, the latter of the Concordia Canonum and the poem " de Bellis Libycis." Various
        other conjectures were formed and combinations imagined which are now not worth discussing,
        since a great portion of the doubt and difficulty was removed by Mazuchelli in 1814, who
        discovered the long-lost <hi rend="ital">Johannis</hi> in the library of the Marquis of
        Trivulzi at Milan, where it had been overlooked in consequence of having been inserted in
        the catalogue as the production of a Johannes de Aretio, who lived towards the close of the
        14th century, and who appears to have transcribed it into the same volume with his own
        barbarous effusions. The Praefatio to this Johannis begins: <quote xml:lang="la" rend="blockquote"><l><hi rend="ital">Victoris,</hi> proceres, praesumsi dicere
         lauros,</l></quote></p><p>while the first lines of the poem itself are the same with those quoted by Cuspianus, thus
        establishing the identity of the piece with that contained in the MSS. of Buda and Monte
        Casino, and enabling us to determine the full name of the author as given at the head of
        this article. The theme is a war carried on in Africa against the Moors and Vandals during
        the reign of Justinian, about the year 550, by a proconsul or magister militiae named
        Johannes, who is the hero of the lay. The campaign in question is noticed by Procopius (<hi rend="ital">B. V.</hi> 2.28, <hi rend="ital">B. G.</hi> 4.17) and Paulus Diaconus. (<hi rend="ital">De Gestis Longobard.</hi> 1.25.) Of Johannes we know nothing except what we are
        told by Procopius and by the poet himself. He was the brother of Pappus; had served along
        with him on two previous occasions in Africa, under Belisarius in 533, and under Germanus in
        537; his father was <pb n="854"/> named Evantus; his wife was the daughter of a king; his
        son was called Peter; he had been employed in the East against the Persians, and had been
        recalled from thence to head an expedition against the rebellious Moors. (Procop. <hi rend="ital">Il. cc.</hi> and <hi rend="ital">B. G.</hi> 4.34; Johan. 1.197, 380,
        7.576.)</p></div></div><div><head>Identity of the Author</head><p>Although the designation and age of Corippus are thus satisfactorily ascertained, and the
       author of the Johannis is proved to be the same person with the panegyrist of Justinian's
       nephew, we have no means of deciding with equal certainty whether he is to be identified with
       the African bishop Cresconius who compiled a <hi rend="ital">Canonum Breviarium</hi> and a
        <hi rend="ital">Concordia Canonum,</hi> the former being a sort of index or table of
       contents to the latter, which comprises an extensive and important collection of laws of the
       Church, arranged not chronologically according to the date of the several councils, but
       systematically according to the nature of the subjects, and distributed under three hundred
       titles. Saxe and most writers upon the history of ecclesiastical literature place the prelate
       in the reign of Tiberius III. as low as <date when-custom="698">A. D. 698</date>, this epoch being
       assigned to him on the double supposition that he was the composer of the Libyan War and that
       this was the Libyan War of Leontius ; but the latter hypothesis has now been proved to be
       false. The epithets <hi rend="ital">Africani</hi> and <hi rend="ital">Grammatici</hi>
       --attached, as we have already seen, to the name of Corippus in the editio princeps of the
       panegyric, the former pointing out his country, which is clearly indicated by several
       expressions in the work itself, the latter a complimentary designation equivalent at that
       period to "learned,"--convey the sum total of the information we possess concerning his
       personal history.</p></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>With regard to his merits, the epigrammatic censure of Baillet, that he was a great
       flatterer and a little poet, is perhaps not absolutely unjust ; but if we view him in
       relation to the state of literature in the age when he flourished, and compare him with his
       contemporaries, we may feel inclined to entertain some respect for his talents. He was
       evidently well read in Virgil, Lucan, and Claudian ; the last two especially seem to have
       been his models ; and hence, while his language is wonderfully pure, we have a constant
       display of rhetorical declamation and a most ambitious straining after splendour of diction.
       Nor is the perusal of his verses unattended with profit, inasmuch as he frequently sheds
       light upon a period of history for which our authorities are singularly imperfect and
       obscure, and frequently illustrates with great life and vigour, the manners of the Byzantine
       court. In proof of this, we need only turn to the 45th chapter of Gibbon, where the striking
       description of Justin's elevation, and the complicated ceremonies which attended his
       coronation, is merely a translation "into simple and concise prose" from the first two books
       of Corippus. The text, as might be anticipated from the circumstance that each poem depends
       upon a single MS., that one of these has never been collated or even seen by any modern
       scholar, and that the other was transcribed at a late period by a most ignorant copyist,--is
       miserably defective; nor can we form any reasonable expectation of its being materially
       improved.</p></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>The Editio Princeps of the <title>Panegyric</title> is generally marked by bibliographers
       as having been printed by <bibl>Plantin, at Antwerp, in 1581</bibl>; but Funceius (<hi rend="ital">De inerti ac decrepit. L. L. Senectute,</hi> p. 247) speaks as if <bibl>Ruiz had
        previously published an edition at Madrid in 1579</bibl>; to this, or these, succeeded the
       edition of <bibl>Thomas Dempster, 8vo., Paris, 1610</bibl>; of <bibl>Rivinus, 8vo., Leipzig,
        1663</bibl>; of <bibl>Ritterhusius, 4to., Altdorf, 1664</bibl>; of <bibl>Goetzius, 8vo.,
        Altdorf, 1743</bibl>; and of <bibl>Foggini, 4to. Rome, 1777</bibl>, which completes the
       list.</p><p>The Johannis, discovered as described above, was first printed at <bibl>Milan, 4to., 1820,
        with the notes of Mazuchelli</bibl>.</p><p>Both works will be found in the best form in the new <bibl><title>Corpus Scriptorum
         Historiae Byzantinae</title> at present in the course of publication at Bonn</bibl>.</p><p>The <title>Canonum Breviarium</title> and the <title>Concordia Canonum</title> are printed
       entire in the first volume of the Bibliotheca Juris Canonici published by Voellus and
       Justellus at Paris, fol. 1661.</p><p><bibl>The <title>Breviarium</title> was first published at Paris by Pithou in 1588, 8vo.,
        and is contained in the <hi rend="ital">Bibliotheca Patrum Lugdun.</hi> vol. ix. </bibl></p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>