<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.coriolanus_c_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.coriolanus_c_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="coriolanus-c-bio-1" n="coriolanus_c_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Coriola'nus</addName>, <forename full="yes">Cn.</forename><surname full="yes">Ma'rcius</surname></persName></label></head><p>or C. <hi rend="smallcaps">CORIOLA'NUS</hi>, the hero of one of the most beautiful of the
      early Roman legends, was said to have been the son of a descendant of king Ancus Marcius. His
      mother's name, according to the best authorities, was Veturia (Plutarch calls her Volumnia).
      He lost his father while yet a child, and under the training of his mother, whom he loved
      exceedingly, grew up to be a brave and valiant man; but he was likewise noted for his
      imperious and proud temper. He was said to have fought in the battle by the lake Regillus, and
      to have won a civic crown in it. To explain his surname, Coriolanus, the legend told how in a
      war with the Volscians their capital, Corioli, was attacked by the Romans. When the enemy made
      a sally, Marcius at the head of a few brave men drove them back, and then, single-handed (for
      his followers could not support him), drove the Volscians before him to the other side of the
      town. So in memory of his prowess the surname Coriolanus was given him. But his haughty
      bearing towards the commons excited their fear and dislike, and when he was a candidate for
      the consulship, they refused to elect him. After this, when there was a famine in the city,
      and a Greek prince sent corn from Sicily, Coriolanus advised that it should not be distributed
      to the commons, unless they gave up their tribunes. For this he was impeached and condemned to
      exile. He now took refuge among the Volscians, and promised to assist them in war against the
      Romans. Attius Tullius, the king of the Volscians, found a pretext for a quarrel, and war was
      declared. Coriolanus was appointed general of the Volscian army. He took many towns, and
      advanced plundering and burning the property of the commons, but sparing that of the
      patricians, till he came to the <hi rend="ital">fossa Cluilia,</hi> or Cluilian dyke. Here he
      encamped, and the Romans in alarn (for they could not raise an army) sent as deputies to him
      five consulars, offering to restore him to his rights. But he refused to make peace unless the
      Romans would restore to the Volscians all the lands they had taken from them, and receive all
      the people as aitizens. To these terms the deputies could not <pb n="853"/> agree. After this
      the Romans sent the ten chief men of the Senate, and then all the priests and augurs. But
      Coriolanus would not listen to them. Then, at the suggestion of Valeria, the noblest matrons
      of Rome, headed by Veturia, and Volumnia, the wife of Coriolanus, with his two little
      children, came to his tent. His mother's reproaches, and the tears of his wife, and the other
      matrons bent his purpose. He led back his army, and lived in exile among the Volscians till
      his death. On the spot where he yielded to his mother's words, a temple was dedicated to
      Fortuna Muliebris, and Valeria was the first priestess.</p><p>Such is the substance of the legend. The date assigned to it in the annals is <date when-custom="-490">B. C. 490</date>. Its inconsistency with the traces of real history which have
      come down to us have been pointed out by Niebuhr, who has also shewn that if his banishment be
      placed some twenty years later, and his attack on the Romans about ten years after that, the
      groundwork of the story is reconcileable with history. The account of his condemnation is not
      applicable to the state of things earlier than <date when-custom="-470">B. C. 470</date>, about
      which time a famine happened, while Hiero was tyrant of Syracuse, and might have been induced
      by his hostility to the Etruscans to send corn to the Romans. Moreover, in <date when-custom="-458">B. C. 458</date>, the Volscians obtained from the Romans the very terms which were proposed
      by Coriolanus. "The list of his conquests is only that of a portion of those made by the
      Volscians transferred to a Roman whose glory was flattering to national vanity." The
      circumstance that the story has been referred to a wrong date Niebuhr considers to have arisen
      from its being mixed up with the foundation of the temple to Fortuna Muliebris. The name
      Coriolanus may have been derived from his settling in the town of Corioli after his
      banishment. Whether he had any share in bringing about the peace of 458, Niebuhr considers
      doubtul.. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Coriolanvs ;</hi>
      <bibl n="Liv. 2.34">Liv. 2.34</bibl>_<bibl n="Liv. 2.40">40</bibl>; <bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 7.20">Dionys. A. R. 7.20</bibl>_<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 8.59">8.59</bibl>;
      Niebuhr, vol. ii. pp. 94-107, 234-260). </p><byline>[<ref target="author.C.P.M">C.P.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>